GARRETT v. JOHNSON et al, No. 1:2020cv02525 - Document 19 (D.N.J. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER directing the Clerk to reopen this matter for purposes of entering this Opinion & Order; ORDERED that 17 MOTION to Appoint Pro Counsel and reopen this matter is DENIED; ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate the Complaint pending receipt of the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 3/19/2021. (dmr)(n.m.)

Download PDF
GARRETT v. JOHNSON et al Doc. 19 Case 1:20-cv-02525-NLH-JS Document 19 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT, 1:20-cv-02525-NLH-JS Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER v. KAREEKA Z. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. APPEARANCE: ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT 4366289 CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 330 FEDERAL STREET CAMDEN, NJ 08102 Plaintiff appearing pro se HILLMAN, District Judge WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020, Plaintiff Allen Dupree Garrett, appearing pro se, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10); and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2020, the Court issued an Opinion explaining that Plaintiff’s current action was subject to the three-strikes provision of § 1915(g). (ECF No. 13.) For this reason, the Court entered an Order directing Plaintiff to submit a sworn statement demonstrating imminent danger of serious physical injury within 30 days of November 18, 2020 (ECF No. 14); and 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-02525-NLH-JS Document 19 Filed 03/22/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 103 WHEREAS, on November 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed a letter notifying this Court that he wished to terminate his case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (ECF No. 15); and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2020, this Court dismissed this action without prejudice (ECF No. 16); and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court to reopen this matter and appoint him pro bono counsel (ECF No. 17); and WHEREAS, the Court finds reopening this matter, at this time, is not warranted because on December 23, 2020, the Court issued an Opinion denying Plaintiff in forma pauperis status. The Court held Plaintiff failed to provide any facts suggesting he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, which was a required showing given his action was subject to the threestrikes provision of § 1915(g), Garrett v. City of Camden, No. 20-17470, 2020 WL 7640566 (D.N.J. Dec. 23, 2020). For this reason, the Court will also deny Plaintiff’s request for the Court to appoint pro bono counsel; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff may reapply for pro bono counsel when he pays the required $400 filing and administrative fees. THEREFORE, IT IS on this 19th day of March, 2021 2 Case 1:20-cv-02525-NLH-JS Document 19 Filed 03/22/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 104 ORDERED that the Clerk of the Clerk shall reopen this matter for purposes of entering this Opinion & Order; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to reopen this matter and for the Court to appoint pro bono counsel be (ECF No. 17), and the same hereby is, DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate the Complaint pending receipt of the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Opinion & Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail. Date: March 19, 2021 At Camden, New Jersey s/ Noel L. Hillman NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.