LYNCH v. CRAF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, No. 1:2019cv10963 - Document 8 (D.N.J. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 9/30/2019. (tf, n.m.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LYNCH v. CRAF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ______________________________ : CRAIG A. LYNCH, : : No. 19-cv-10963 (NLH)(AMD) Plaintiff, : : v. : MEMORANDUM OPINION : CRAF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS: : Defendant. : ______________________________: IT APPEARING THAT: 1. Plaintiff Craig A. Lynch filed a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2. ECF No. 1. On September 18, 2019, the Clerk’s Office mailed to Plaintiff a Notice of Call for Dismissal pursuant to Local Civil Rule 41.1(a). ECF No. 6. The Notice was sent to Plaintiff’s address of record at the Bayside State Prison in Leesburg, New Jersey. 3. The Notice mailed to Plaintiff’s address of record has been returned to sender with the envelop marked “Return to Sender, Refused, Unable To Forward.” See ECF No. 7. It also appears with a stamp that provides “Return to Sender Item Refused, No Longer in Custody.” See id. It appears that Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at Bayside State Prison. 4. Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court regarding 1 Dockets.Justia.com his new address, in violation of Local Civil Rule 10.1. See L. Civ. R. 10.1(a) (“Counsel and/or unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their or their client’s address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the Clerk.”). 5. Based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 10.1, the Clerk of the Court will be ordered to administratively terminate this case, with the right to reopen this matter upon Plaintiff updating his contact information to satisfy the appropriate Rules. 6. An appropriate order follows. Dated: September 30, 2019 At Camden, New Jersey s/ Noel L. Hillman NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
