EVRON v. ORTIZ et al, No. 1:2017cv01629 - Document 8 (D.N.J. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 10/19/2018. (rtm, )(nm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MICHAEL EVRON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1629 (RBK)(KMW) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID ORTIZ, et al., Defendants. Kugler, District Judge 1. On March 7, 2017, Plaintiff Michael Evron filed his complaint in this matter pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2. The Court allowed the complaint to proceed in part, against certain defendants on August 28, 2018. 3. The post office returned mail sent to Plaintiff as undeliverable on September 24, 2018, as Plaintiff was released from FCI Fort Dix on August 22, 2018. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court in the intervening time to provide an updated address. 4. Local Civil Rule 10.1(a) requires unrepresented parties to notify the Court of any change in address within 7 days. The Rule further provides that, failure to file such notice “may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.” Id. Indeed, failure to apprise the Court of an address change may result in the outright dismissal of the case for failure to proceed, or an administrative termination of the action without prejudice. See, e.g., Allebach v. Cathell, No. 065005, 2009 WL 2147145 (D.N.J. July 15, 2009); Boretsky v. Corzine, No. 08-2265, 2008 WL 2512916 (D.N.J. June 23, 2008). 5. As the Court does not have a current address for Plaintiff, the matter cannot proceed at this time. The Court will therefore administratively terminate the proceedings without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to reinstate this action by notifying the Court and defendants of his new address within 30 days. 6. Failure to provide an updated address within 30 days of the date of this Order may result in the matter being dismissed for lack of prosecution. 7. An appropriate Order follows. Date: October 19, 2018 s/Robert B. Kugler ROBERT B. KUGLER U.S. District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
