CHOY v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., No. 1:2008cv04092 - Document 252 (D.N.J. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/22/2015. (tf, )

Download PDF
CHOY v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Doc. 252 NOT FOR PUBLICATION (Doc. No. 246) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE ___________________________________ : Michael M. CHOY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : COMCAST CABLE : COMMUNICATIONS, INC., : : Defendant. : ___________________________________ : Civil No. 08-4092 (RBK/AMD) OPINION KUGLER, United States District Judge: Michael M. Choy (“Plaintiff”) sued Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. (“Comcast”), alleging discriminatory termination of his employment. The jury disagreed and the Court entered judgment in favor of Comcast on September 18, 2012. (Doc. No. 188). Plaintiff appealed. The matter currently before this Court concerns the accuracy of the transcript of the jury selection for that trial. On January 18, 2015, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Verify Corrupted Trial Transcripts.” (Doc. No. 244). On March 17, 2015, he filed this “Motion that Appeals Court Correct Falsified Transcript” in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. (Doc. No. 246). The Court of Appeals transferred Plaintiff’s Motion to this Court. (Doc. No. 245). This Court denied Plaintiff’s “Motion to Verify Corrupted Trial Transcripts” on March 31, 2015. (Doc. No. 248). As set forth in that opinion, Plaintiff presents no evidence of any irregularity in the official transcript. The court reporter has checked his stenographic notes and 1 Dockets.Justia.com his personal audio recording and confirmed the accuracy of the transcript. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s “Motion that Appeals Court Correct Falsified Transcript” (Doc. No. 246) is DENIED. Dated: 09/22/2015 s/ Robert B. Kugler ROBERT B. KUGLER United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.