US Securities and Exchange Commission v. LBRY, Inc., No. 1:2021cv00260 - Document 86 (D.N.H. 2022)
Court Description: ///MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall schedule a status conference to discuss the process for resolving any remaining issues. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(js)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
US Securities and Exchange Commission v. LBRY, Inc. Doc. 86 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 1 of 22 U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E D I S T R I C T O F N E W H AM P S H I R E S e c u r it ie s a n d E x c h a n g e C o m m is s i o n v. Ca se No. 21-cv-260-P B Opin ion No. 2022 DNH 138 L B R Y, I n c . ME MO R AN D U M AN D O R D E R Th e Secu r it ies a n d E xch a n ge Com m ission (SE C) con t en ds t h a t LBRY, In c. offer ed a n d sold u n r egist er ed secu r it ies in viola t ion of Sect ion 5 of t h e Secu r it ies Act of 1933. LBRY r espon ds t h a t it does n ot n eed t o com ply wit h t h e Secu r it ies Act beca u se it s a lleged secu r it y, a blockch a in t oken ca lled LBC, is n ot a secu r it y a t a ll. In st ea d, it a r gu es t h a t LBC fu n ct ion s a s a digit a l cu r r en cy t h a t is a n essen t ia l com pon en t of t h e LBRY Blockch a in . LBRY a lso a sser t s t h a t t h e SE C’s a t t em pt t o t r ea t LBC a s a secu r it y viola t es it s r igh t t o du e pr ocess beca u se t h e a gen cy did n ot give LBRY fa ir n ot ice t h a t it s offer in gs of LBC a r e su bject t o t h e secu r it ies la ws. Th e pa r t ies h a ve filed cr oss-m ot ion s for su m m a r y ju dgm en t a ddr essin g bot h issu es. I. B AC KG R O U N D Th e n a scen t t ech n ology kn own a s blockch a in oper a t es in t h e ba ckgr ou n d of t h is dispu t e. F r om it s ea r liest da ys, pr opon en t s of block ch a in t ech n ology h a ve en vision ed it a s fu n da m en t a lly a lt er in g m a n y a spect s of Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 2 of 22 m oder n life. See Sa t osh i Na k a m ot o, Bit coin : A P eer -t o-P eer E lect r on ic Ca sh Syst em (2008), h t t ps://bit coin .or g/bit coin .pdf (ou t lin in g t h e idea for a peer -t opeer elect r on ic pa ym en t syst em ). As LBRY expla in s, a blockch a in is essen t ia lly a “decen t r a lized ledger m a in t a in ed by a n et wor k of in depen den t ly own ed com pu t er s.” See Ka u ffm a n Decl., Doc. No. 61-3 a t 2 ¶ 5. Ver ified da t a is h eld in decen t r a lized “block[s]” lin ked t oget h er via cr ypt ogr a ph ic con sen su s pr ot ocols. See id. a t 2 ¶ 9. New da t a is con n ect ed t o pr eviou s blocks, for m in g a ch a in . See id. a t 2 ¶ 6. Digit a l t ok en s a r e u sed t o com pen sa t e “m in er s” wh o va lida t e t r a n sa ct ion s a n d a llow for peer -t o-peer “t r a n sfer s of va lu e,” wh ich a r e t h en logged in t h e decen t r a lized ledger . See id. a t 2 ¶ ¶ 6, 9; see a lso Mor ici v. H a sh fa st Tech s. LLC, No. 5:14-cv-00087-E J D, 2015 WL 906005, a t *2 (N.D. Ca l. F eb. 27, 2015) (fu r t h er discu ssin g t h e t ech n ica l det a ils of “m in in g”). A. T h e D e v e lo p m e n t o f t h e L B R Y N e t w o r k LBRY bega n a s a n effor t t o h a r n ess blockch a in t ech n ology t o a llow u ser s t o sh a r e videos, im a ges, a n d ot h er digit a l con t en t wit h ou t a cen t r a lized h ost su ch a s You Tu be. See Def.’s Mem ., Doc. No. 61-1 a t 3. LBRY a sser t s t h a t it s LBRY Net wor k is “t h e fir st decen t r a lized, open -sou r ce, fu lly en cr ypt ed con t en t dist r ibu t ion ser vice bu ilt u sin g t h e sa m e blockch a in t ech n ology t h a t u n der lies Bit coin .” See In t r odu cin g LBRY: Th e Bit coin of Con t en t , Doc. No. 61-9 a t 1. Th e LBRY Net wor k is com pr ised of t h r ee com pon en t s: “(1) t h e 2 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 3 of 22 LBRY Blockch a in , (2) t h e LBRY Da t a N et wor k, a n d (3) t h e a pplica t ion s la yer [.]” Ka u ffm a n Decl., Doc. No. 61-3 a t 3 ¶ 11. LBRY developed t h e “LBRY Deskt op Applica t ion ” t o r u n on t h e LBRY Net wor k. 1 Id. a t 9 ¶ 26. LBRY h a s a lso developed ot h er a pplica t ion s t o r u n on t h e n et wor k, a s h a ve ot h er t h ir dpa r t y developer s. Id. a t 4 ¶ 11. LBRY Cr edit s, or LBC, is t h e n a t ive digit a l t oken of t h e LBRY Blockch a in . Id. a t 4 ¶ 12. It is u sed t o com pen sa t e m in er s, bu t it ca n a lso be spen t on t h e LBRY Blockch a in t o pu blish con t en t , cr ea t e “ch a n n el[s]” t h a t a ssocia t e con t en t wit h a sin gle u ser , t ip con t en t cr ea t or s, pu r ch a se pa ywa ll con t en t , or “boost []” ch a n n els or con t en t in sea r ch r esu lt s. See id. a t 5-6 ¶ 17. User s gen er a lly m u st pa y a fee in LBC in or der t o “in t er a ct wit h t h e LBRY Net wor k for a n yt h in g beyon d viewin g fr ee con t en t .” Id. a t 4 ¶ 12. Th e LBRY Net wor k wa s design ed t o even t u a lly h a ve a cir cu la t ion of a ppr oxim a t ely 1 billion LBC. See id. a t 4 ¶ 13. Most of t h e LBC will be r elea sed in t h e fu t u r e t o com pen sa t e m in er s, bu t wh en t h e LBRY Blockch a in la u n ch ed in J u n e 2016, LBRY r eser ved a “pr e-m in e” of 400 m illion LBC for it self. See id. a t 5-6 ¶ ¶ 14-15; see a lso Ka u ffm a n Dep., Doc. No. 62-20 a t 5. It t h en sor t ed it s LBC in t o t h r ee bu ck et s: (1) 200 m illion in t o a “Com m u n it y 1 LBRY h a s r en a m ed t h is a pplica t ion “Odysee.” Ka u ffm a n Decl., Doc. No. 613 a t 10 ¶ 35. 3 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 4 of 22 F u n d,” t o be u sed for “spr ea din g u sa ge a n d a dopt ion ” of t h e Net wor k by “r ewa r din g ea r ly a dopt er s,” “r ecr u it in g pr odu cer s,” a n d “r ewa r din g con t r ibu t or s t o t h e com m u n it y”; (2) 100 m illion in t o a n “In st it u t ion a l F u n d,” t o a llow for “t h e for m a t ion of in st it u t ion a l pa r t n er sh ips, a s well a s for gr a n t s a n d don a t ion s t o n on pr ofit s a n d ot h er [NGOs] wit h sim ila r va lu es a s LBRY”; a n d (3) 100 m illion in t o t h e a pt ly n a m ed “Oper a t ion a l F u n d,” t o be u sed for “oper a t ion a l pu r poses.” See Ka u ffm a n Decl., Doc. No. 61-3 a t 5 ¶ 14. LBRY’s co-fou n der s la r gely self-fu n ded t h eir in it ia l developm en t effor t s, bu t t h ey did r a ise “a sm a ll a m ou n t of fu n ds fr om a n u m ber of a n gel in vest or s.” See Def.’s Mem ., Doc. N o. 61-1 a t 5. In Sept em ber 2016, t h e com pa n y a lso obt a in ed $500,000 in debt fin a n cin g t h r ou gh P illa r VC, a ven t u r e ca pit a l fir m . See Ka u ffm a n Decl., Doc. No. 61-3 a t 9 ¶ 29. Sin ce t h en , LBRY h a s la r gely r elied on sa les a n d t r a n sfer s of LBC t o fu n d it s oper a t ion s. See 9/28/2016 LBRY Ar t icle, Doc. No. 57-8. To da t e, t h e com pa n y h a s spen t a ppr oxim a t ely h a lf of it s pr e-m in ed LBC t h r ou gh va r iou s t r a n sa ct ion s. See Ka u ffm a n Decl., Doc. No. 61-3 a t 4 ¶ 14. LBRY a ssign ed 2 m illion of it s pr e-m in ed LBC t o P illa r t o ext en d t h e com pa n y’s debt fin a n cin g. See Token Issu a n ce Agr eem en t , Doc. No. 64-30. It sold 1.7 m illion LBC t o t h r ee ot h er en t it ies: F lipside Cr ypt o, a com pa n y t h a t iden t ifies, a cqu ir es, a n d st or es cr ypt ogr a ph ic a sset s for in vest m en t clu bs, a n d a pa ir of on lin e t r a din g pla t for m s, Sh a peSh ift a n d Coin E x. See F in er Let t er , 4 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 5 of 22 Doc. No. 64-18 a t 4; Ka u ffm a n Dep., Doc. No. 56-7 a t 28; LBRY Qu a r t er ly Cr edit Repor t , Doc. No. 64-12 a t 8. It sold m or e t h a n 9.8 m illion LBC t o t h e pu blic dir ect ly t h r ou gh LBRY a pplica t ion s a n d a n ot h er 44.1 m illion LBC t h r ou gh va r iou s digit a l a sset t r a din g pla t for m s. See Moon P a y Agr eem en t , Doc. No. 65-12; P l’s St a t em en t of F a ct s, Doc. No. 55-2 a t 20 ¶ ¶ 84-87. An d it u sed m or e t h a n 142 m illion LBC t o in cen t ivize u ser s, soft wa r e developer s, a n d soft wa r e t est er s, a s well a s com pen sa t e em ployees a n d con t r a ct or s. See LBRY Am en ded Respon se, Doc. No. 64-17. B . T h e E n fo r c e m e n t Ac t io n Th e SE C br ou gh t t h is en for cem en t a ct ion in Ma r ch 2021. See Com pl., Doc. No. 1 a t 1. Th e a gen cy’s sole cla im is t h a t LBRY’s u n r egist er ed offer in gs of LBC viola t e sect ion s 5(a ) a n d (c) of t h e Secu r it ies Act , 15 U.S.C. § 77e(a ), (c). Com pl., Doc. No. 1 a t 15. Th e SE C seeks in ju n ct ive r elief, disgor gem en t of m on ies obt a in ed t h r ou gh LBRY’s offer in gs, a n d civil pen a lt ies. Id. a t 15-16. II. S T AN D AR D O F R E VI E W Su m m a r y ju dgm en t is wa r r a n t ed “on ly if t h e r ecor d, con st r u ed in t h e ligh t m ost a m ia ble t o t h e n on m ova n t , pr esen t s n o gen u in e issu e a s t o a n y m a t er ia l fa ct a n d r eflect s t h e m ova n t ’s en t it lem en t t o ju dgm en t a s a m a t t er of la w.” P er ea v. E dit or ia l Cu lt u r a l, In c., 13 F .4t h 43, 50 (1st Cir . 2021) (qu ot in g Ir obe v. USDA, 890 F .3d 371, 377 (1st Cir . 2018)) (clea n ed u p). I n eed n ot con sider fa ct u a l dispu t es im m a t er ia l t o t h e lega l issu es u n der 5 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 6 of 22 r eview in r u lin g on a m ot ion for su m m a r y ju dgm en t . See An der son v. Liber t y Lobby, In c., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 (1986) (“[T]h e m er e exist en ce of som e a lleged fa ct u a l dispu t e bet ween t h e pa r t ies will n ot defea t a n ot h er wise pr oper ly su ppor t ed m ot ion for su m m a r y ju dgm en t [.]”). Wh en pa r t ies cr ossm ove for su m m a r y ju dgm en t , I “view ea ch m ot ion sepa r a t ely, dr a win g a ll in fer en ces in fa vor of t h e n on m ovin g pa r t y.” See Gigu er e v. P or t Res. In c., 927 F .3d 43, 47 (1st Cir . 2019) (qu ot in g F a dili v. Deu t sch e Ba n k Na t ’l Tr . Co., 772 F .3d 951, 953 (1st Cir . 2014)); see a lso Ma n del v. Bost on P h oen ix, In c., 456 F .3d 198, 205 (1st Cir . 2006) (“Th e pr esen ce of cr oss-m ot ion s for su m m a r y ju dgm en t n eit h er dilu t es n or dist or t s t h is st a n da r d of r eview.”). Th u s, I m u st “det er m in e wh et h er eit h er of t h e pa r t ies deser ves ju dgm en t a s a m a t t er of la w on fa ct s t h a t a r e n ot dispu t ed.” See Adr ia In t ’l Gr p., In c. v. F er r é Dev., In c., 241 F .3d 103, 107 (1st Cir . 2001). III. AN AL YS I S To est a blish a pr im a fa cie viola t ion of Sect ion 5 of t h e Secu r it ies Act , t h e SE C m u st pr ove t h a t LBRY offer ed or sold secu r it ies in in t er st a t e com m er ce wit h ou t filin g a r egist r a t ion st a t em en t . See SE C v. Gen Au dio In c., 32 F .4t h 902, 939 (10t h Cir . 2022); see a lso SE C v. Ka h lon , 873 F .3d 500, 504 (5t h Cir . 2017). LBRY does n ot ch a llen ge t h e SE C’s con t en t ion t h a t it offer ed a n d sold LBC in in t er st a t e com m er ce wit h ou t r egist er in g it s offer in gs wit h t h e SE C. Nor does it a r gu e t h a t it s pa st offer in gs fa ll wit h in a n exem pt ion t o 6 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 7 of 22 t h e r egist r a t ion r equ ir em en t . Th u s, t h e on ly issu es im pedin g a fin din g t h a t LBRY viola t ed Sect ion 5 a r e LBRY’s cla im t h a t it did n ot offer LBC a s a secu r it y a n d it s a r gu m en t t h a t it wa s n ot given fa ir n ot ice t h a t it n eeded t o r egist er it s offer in gs. I a ddr ess ea ch issu e in t u r n . A. D id L B R Y O ffe r L B C a s a S e c u r i t y ? Wh en Con gr ess a dopt ed t h e Secu r it ies Act , “it en a ct ed a defin it ion of ‘secu r it y’ su fficien t ly br oa d t o en com pa ss vir t u a lly a n y in st r u m en t t h a t m igh t be sold a s a n in vest m en t .” Reves v. E r n st & You n g, 494 U.S. 56, 61 (1990). On e su ch in st r u m en t is a n “in vest m en t con t r a ct ,” wh ich t h e Su pr em e Cou r t defin ed in SE C v. W.J . H owey Co. a s “a con t r a ct , t r a n sa ct ion or sch em e wh er eby a per son in vest s h is m on ey in a com m on en t er pr ise a n d is led t o expect pr ofit s solely fr om t h e effor t s of t h e pr om ot er or a t h ir d pa r t y.” 328 U.S. 293, 298-99 (1946); see a lso SE C v. SG Lt d., 265 F .3d 42, 46 (1st Cir . 2001). Con sist en t wit h t h e br oa d r ea ch of t h e Secu r it ies Act , “[t ]h is defin it ion ‘em bodies a flexible r a t h er t h a n a st a t ic pr in ciple, on e t h a t is ca pa ble of a da pt a t ion t o m eet t h e cou n t less a n d va r ia ble sch em es devised by t h ose wh o seek t h e u se of t h e m on ey of ot h er s on t h e pr om ise of pr ofit s.’” SE C v. E dwa r ds, 540 U.S. 389, 393 (2004) (qu ot in g H owey, 328 U.S. a t 299). Th e focu s of t h e in qu ir y is on t h e object ive econ om ic r ea lit ies of t h e t r a n sa ct ion r a t h er t h a n t h e for m t h a t t h e t r a n sa ct ion t a kes. Un it ed H ou s. F ou n d. v. F or m a n , 421 U.S. 837, 848 (1975); see a lso Wa r field v. Ala n iz, 569 F .3d 1015, 7 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 8 of 22 1021 (9t h Cir . 2009) (“Un der H owey, cou r t s con du ct a n object ive in qu ir y in t o t h e ch a r a ct er of t h e in st r u m en t or t r a n sa ct ion offer ed ba sed on wh a t t h e pu r ch a ser s wer e ‘led t o expect .’”). Th e F ir st Cir cu it h a s br oken t h e H owey t est in t o t h r ee pa r t s: “(1) t h e in vest m en t of m on ey (2) in a com m on en t er pr ise (3) wit h a n expect a t ion of pr ofit s t o be der ived solely fr om t h e effor t s of t h e pr om ot er or a t h ir d pa r t y.” SG Lt d., 265 F .3d a t 46. H er e, on ly t h e t h ir d com pon en t of t h e H owey t est is in dispu t e. Th u s, t h e issu e t o be decided is wh et h er t h e econ om ic r ea lit ies su r r ou n din g LBRY’s offer in gs of LBC led in vest or s t o h a ve “a r ea son a ble expect a t ion of pr ofit s t o be der ived fr om t h e en t r epr en eu r ia l or m a n a ger ia l effor t s of ot h er s.”2 See F or m a n , 421 U.S. a t 852. I a n a lyze t h e eviden ce t h a t bea r s on t h is issu e by fir st exa m in in g LBRY’s r epr esen t a t ion s t o pr ospect ive pu r ch a ser s a n d t h e com pa n y’s bu sin ess m odel. I t h en t u r n t o LBRY’s 2 In H owey, t h e Cou r t st a t ed t h a t t h e expect ed pr ofit s fr om a n in vest m en t m u st be du e “solely” t o t h e effor t s of a pr om ot er or a t h ir d pa r t y. 328 U.S. a t 299 (em ph a sis a dded). “Th e cou r t s of a ppea ls h a ve been u n a n im ou s in declin in g t o give lit er a l m ea n in g t o t h e wor d ‘solely’ in ” a pplyin g H owey. SG Lt d., 265 F .3d a t 55. I join t h eir n u m ber . Th e r equ ir em en t is in st ea d sa t isfied wh en “t h e effor t s m a de by t h ose ot h er t h a n t h e in vest or a r e t h e u n den ia bly sign ifica n t on es, t h ose essen t ia l m a n a ger ia l effor t s wh ich a ffect t h e fa ilu r e or su ccess of t h e en t er pr ise.” Id. (qu ot in g SE C v. Glen n W. Tu r n er E n t er s., 474 F .2d 476, 482 (9t h Cir . 1973)); a ccor d Un it ed St a t es v. Leon a r d, 529 F .3d 83, 88 n .6 (2d Cir . 2008). 8 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 9 of 22 a r gu m en t t h a t it h a s n ot offer ed LBC a s a secu r it y beca u se som e pu r ch a ser s a cqu ir ed LBC for u se on t h e LBRY Net wor k. 1. L B R Y’s R e p r e s e n t a t io n s t o P o t e n t ia l P u r c h a s e r s Th e SE C iden t ifies m u lt iple st a t em en t s by LBRY t h a t it cla im s led pot en t ia l in vest or s t o r ea son a bly expect t h a t LBC wou ld gr ow in va lu e a s t h e com pa n y con t in u ed t o over see t h e developm en t of t h e LBRY Net wor k. LBRY m in im izes t h e sign ifica n ce of t h ese st a t em en t s, a n d poin t s t o it s m a n y discla im er s t h a t it did n ot in t en d for LBC t o be pu r ch a sed a s a n in vest m en t , bu t t h e SE C is cor r ect . LBRY h a s - a t key m om en t s a n d despit e it s pr ot est a t ion s - been a cu t ely a wa r e of LBC’s pot en t ia l va lu e a s a n in vest m en t . An d it m a de su r e pot en t ia l in vest or s wer e t oo. Wh en LBRY la u n ch ed t h e LBRY Net wor k in J u n e 2016, LBC’s m a r ket ca pit a liza t ion wa s a h ea lt h y $140 m illion . See 7/15/2016 LBRY Ar t icle, Doc. No. 57-11. Th is, despit e t h e Net wor k’s r ela t ive in fa n cy a n d lim it ed u sa bilit y. By t h e followin g m on t h , LBC’s m a r ket ca pit a liza t ion h a d ba lloon ed t o $1.2 billion . Id. In r espon se, LBRY issu ed a blog post r eflect in g on LBC's skyr ocket in g va lu e. See id. LBRY ca pt ion ed t h e post : “1.2B Ma r ket Ca p a n d We Don ’t Ca r e.” Id. It bega n by t ou t in g t h e r a pid gr owt h in LBC’s va lu e, bu t fr a n kly a ckn owledged t h a t it cou ld n ot sa y wh et h er t h e cu r r en t va lu a t ion wa s ju st ified. Id. At t h a t poin t , on ly t h r ee videos wer e a va ila ble on t h e blockch a in , ea ch pr odu ced by 9 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 10 of 22 LBRY it self. See id. An d LBRY’s st a ff wer e h a r d a t wor k “fr a n t ica lly debu ggin g” a n d developin g it s pr odu ct . Id. Wh a t LBRY did cla im t o kn ow t h ou gh wa s “t h a t t h e lon g-t er m va lu e pr oposit ion of LBRY is t r em en dou s, bu t a lso depen den t on ou r t ea m st a yin g focu sed on t h e t a sk a t h a n d: bu ildin g t h is t h in g.” Id. It t h en closed t h e post by a n n ou n cin g a policy of n eu t r a lit y wit h r espect t o LBC's pr ice bu t pla in ly st a t in g t h a t “[o]ver t h e lon g-t er m , t h e in t er est s of LBRY a n d t h e h older s of [LBC] a r e a lign ed.” Id. In Au gu st 2016, t h e COO of LBRY, J osh F in er , em a iled a pot en t ia l in vest or expla in in g t h a t t h e com pa n y wa s “cu r r en t ly n egot ia t in g pr iva t e pla cem en t s of LBC wit h sever a l [ot h er ] in vest or s” a n d a sked t h e r ecipien t t o wr it e h im ba ck “if t h er e is in t er est ” so t h e t wo cou ld “ch a t .” See COO E m a il, Doc. No. 59-7. 3 Th e t h r u st of t h e em a il (su bject lin e: “LBRY Cr edit s Now Tr a din g – LBC”) is clea r . See id. Aft er br iefly n ot in g t h a t t h e pla t for m wa s u p a n d r u n n in g, t h e COO expla in ed h ow LBC a r e bein g t r a ded on “m a jor cr ypt o exch a n ges” a n d t h a t t r a din g volu m e is m ovin g a t a h ea lt h y clip. See id. Th e “oppor t u n it y is obviou s,” wr ot e t h e COO, “bu y a bu n ch of cr edit s, pu t t h em a wa y sa fely, a n d h ope t h a t in 1-3 yea r s we’ve a ppr ecia t ed even 10% of h ow 3 LBRY dispu t es t h e SE C’s cla im t h a t t h e r ecipien t wa s a n in vest or bu t does n ot sa y wh o t h e r ecipien t a ct u a lly wa s. See Def.’s F a ct Respon ses, Doc. No. 74-25 a t 7 ¶ 65. 10 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 11 of 22 m u ch Bit coin h a s in t h e pa st few yea r s.” Id. H e wr a ps u p by pit ch in g LBRY’s com m it m en t t o bu ildin g it s Net wor k: “[i]f ou r pr odu ct h a s t h e u t ilit y we pla n , t h e cr edit s sh ou ld a ppr ecia t e a ccor din gly.” Id. By Novem ber 2016, LBC’s pr ice wa s down , a n d som e LBC in vest or s wer e get t in g jit t er y. J er em y Ka u ffm a n , LBRY’s CE O, pu blish ed a blog post t it led “Acr ypt ypica l: Th e CE O of LBRY on t h e pr ice of LBC,” ou t lin in g h is view of LBRY’s con dit ion a n d pr ovidin g “a ca n on ica l a n swer t o qu est ion s a bou t t h e pr ice of LBC.” See 11/15/2016 Ar t icle, Doc. No. 57-21. LBC’s pr ice wa s low, h e con t en ded, beca u se of sim ple econ om ics: t h e su pply of LBC en t er in g cir cu la t ion t h r ou gh m in in g wa s ou t pa cin g t h e dem a n d for n ew t oken s. See id. An d dem a n d wa s low beca u se, a t t h a t poin t , “t h er e [wa s] n o r ea son t o bu y” LBC. See id. Wh en LBRY la u n ch ed, Ka u ffm a n expla in ed, it wa s “t h e ba r est , m in im u m pr oof-of-con cept [a pplica t ion ] possible.” Id. Alt h ou gh it h a d on ly been a few m on t h s sin ce t h e la u n ch , LBRY st ill st r essed it s lon g-t er m goa l of “bu il[din g] a pr odu ct t h a t is com pellin g en ou gh t o ch a n ge people’s h a bit s,” r epla cin g “You Tu be” a n d “Am a zon .” See id. An d wh ile in vest or s wer e u n lik ely t o m a ke a “qu ick bu ck,” Ka u ffm a n en cou r a ged t h em t o “h old on t o [t h eir LBC] (or spen d it t o bu y som e of [LBRY’s] gr ea t con t en t . . . .).” Id. LBRY’s m essa ge wa s clea r : We a r e a wor k in pr ogr ess. LBC r eflect s t h a t . Bea r wit h u s. 11 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 12 of 22 In a n ot h er com m u n ica t ion , t h is t im e on Reddit , a u ser wh o wa s “t r yin g t o do [t h eir ] r esea r ch befor e pu t t in g in [t h eir ] m on ey” a sked som e gen er a l qu est ion s a bou t h ow LBRY wou ld m a n a ge it s h oldin gs of LBC. See Reddit Th r ea d, Doc. N o. 57-20. In r espon se, LBRY’s Com m u n it y Ma n a ger expla in ed t h a t t h e on ly wa y LBC will be “wor t h som et h in g in t h e fu t u r e is if LBRY deliver s on t h eir pr om ises t o cr ea t e a r evolu t ion a r y wa y t o sh a r e a n d m on et ize con t en t .” See id. Th e t h r ea d a lso in clu des a n ot h er Reddit or a dvisin g t h e com m u n it y m a n a ger on wh a t in for m a t ion “wou ld h elp people wit h t h eir in vest m en t decision s.” See id. An ot h er r eleva n t r epr esen t a t ion ca m e in a n in t er view wit h Mike Vin e, LBRY’s “Tech n ology E va n gelist ”. See Vin e In t er view, Doc. No. 57-19. Vin e expla in ed h ow t h e fu t u r e “va lu e of LBRY cr edit s” wou ld depen d on “t h e su ccess of ou r m edia m a r ket pla ce.” See id. Wh en t h e in t er viewer a sk ed h ow LBRY wou ld k eep “st olen [,] . . . u n sa vor y, or down r igh t illega l” con t en t fr om t h e pr ot ocol, Vin e’s r espon se bet r a yed LBRY’s power br okin g r ole wit h in it s ecosyst em by expla in in g t h a t LBRY m igh t be a ble t o u se it s “posit ion a s t h e ‘m a r ket m a ker ’ of [LBC] t o ba sica lly m a ke it m or e expen sive for people t o a bu se t h e n et wor k.” See id. In J a n u a r y 2018, Ka u ffm a n wr ot e fu r t h er on t h e ben efit s of blockch a in t ech n ology in a n ot h er essa y en t it led “Blockch a in is Love, Blockch a in is Life.” See 1/10/2018 LBRY Ar t icle, Doc. No. 57-16. Th er e, h e wr ot e a bou t wh a t h e 12 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 13 of 22 ca lled t h e “in cen t ive pr oblem []” in developin g open -sou r ce a lt er n a t ives t o exist in g t ech n ologies t h a t a r e con t r olled by pr iva t e com pa n ies. See id. On e solu t ion t o t h is pr oblem , a s Ka u ffm a n sa w it , wa s t o be fou n d in blockch a in t ech n ology, wh ich a llowed for blockch a in t oken s t o be u sed t o r ea lign in cen t ives. See id. Beca u se a blockch a in t oken “h a s va lu e in pr opor t ion t o t h e u sa ge a n d su ccess of t h e n et wor k,” developer s a r e in cen t ivized t o wor k t o develop a n d pr om ot e n ew u ses for block ch a in . Id. As Ka u ffm a n pu t it : It m ea n s t h a t t h e people wh o discover a n d u t ilize a n ew pr ot ocol or n et wor k wh en it ’s ju st get t in g off t h e gr ou n d ca n r ea p su bst a n t ia l va lu e by bein g t h er e fir st . Th is solves t h e in cen t ive pr oblem s a r ou n d bein g a fir st -m over a n d soft en s t h e pa in of u sin g a ser vice t h a t pr oba bly won ’t be a s fea t u r e-r ich or slick a s est a blish ed com pet it or s’ opt ion s. It pr ovides a sou r ce of fu n din g for t h e developm en t of t h e pr ot ocol. Th e cr ea t or s ca n u se t h e t oken t o pa y for t h e sa la r ies a n d equ ipm en t r equ ir ed t o get it st a r t ed. Id. An d in yet a n ot h er post , t h is t im e in Oct ober 2020, LBRY pr ovided a n ot h er posit ive u pda t e. See 10/14/2020 LBRY Ar t icle, Doc. No. 57-24. It expla in ed t h a t it st ill sa w it self a s m eet in g t h e con su m er “dem a n d for a u ser own ed a n d con t r olled a lt er n a t ive t o You Tu be a n d big t ech .” See id. In deed, it s wor k cr ea t in g a “com pellin g t oken econ om y cen t er ed a r ou n d digit a l con t en t exch a n ge” wa s st ill “im m in en t ly a ch ieva ble” wit h ju st “som e t wea k s.” See id. LBRY a lso t ou t ed t h e en or m ou s pot en t ia l it sa w in con t in u in g t o develop it s a pplica t ion on it s blockch a in . Ot h er blockch a in com pa n ies, t h e post a sser t ed, 13 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 14 of 22 a r e for ced t o r ely on “som e t h ir d-pa r t y” t o “m a gicly [sic] bu ild a wor ld-cla ss a pplica t ion ” on t h eir blockch a in s. See id. Not LBRY. An d sin ce “[a ]pplica t ion s u sed by billion s of people ca n be wor t h t r illion s of dolla r s,” LBRY wa s u n iqu ely poised t o “deliver t h a t va lu e” by “own [in g] t h e wh ole st a ck.” See id. Th ese st a t em en t s a r e r epr esen t a t ive of LBRY’s over a ll m essa gin g a bou t t h e gr owt h pot en t ia l for LBC, a n d t h u s t h e SE C is cor r ect t h a t pot en t ia l in vest or s wou ld u n der st a n d t h a t LBRY wa s pit ch in g a specu la t ive va lu e pr oposit ion for it s digit a l t oken . LBRY’s m essa gin g a m ou n t s t o pr ecisely t h e “n ot -ver y-su bt le for m of econ om ic in du cem en t ” t h e F ir st Cir cu it iden t ified in SG a s eviden cin g H owey’s “expect a t ion of pr ofit s.” See SG Lt d., 265 F .3d a t 54-55. LBRY does n ot disa vow it s st a t em en t s r ega r din g LBC’s va lu e or pr ice, bu t n ot es t h a t t h e st a t em en t s t h e SE C iden t ifies con st it u t e on ly 0.25% of “t h e t ot a l n u m ber of post s a n d m essa ges t h e com pa n y h a s pu blish ed sin ce it s in cept ion .” See Def.’s Obj., Doc. No. 74 a t 5. Bu t t h is st a t ist ic r elies on a m islea din g den om in a t or . Of cou r se, like m a n y ot h er com pa n ies, LBRY r egu la r ly pu blish es st a t em en t s on a r a n ge of t opics, a n d cou ld n ot a r gu e t h a t t h e 8,805 t weet s it iden t ified h a vin g post ed, see id., a ll per t a in in equ a l m ea su r e t o it s views of LBC’s lon g-t er m va lu e pr oposit ion . Sin ce LBRY m a kes n o effor t t o t a lly t h e n u m ber of com pa r a ble st a t em en t s t o t h ose iden t ified by t h e SE C, it s a r gu m en t la ck s weigh t . 14 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 15 of 22 LBRY a lso r elies on t h e fa ct t h a t it in for m ed som e pot en t ia l pu r ch a ser s of LBC t h a t t h e com pa n y wa s n ot offer in g it s t ok en a s a n in vest m en t . Bu t a discla im er ca n n ot u n do t h e object ive econ om ic r ea lit ies of a t r a n sa ct ion . See SE C v. Telegr a m Gr p. In c., 448 F . Su pp.3d 352, 365 (S.D.N .Y. 2020) (cit in g SG Lt d., 265 F .3d a t 54) (“Discla im er s, if con t r a r y t o t h e a ppa r en t econ om ic r ea lit y of a t r a n sa ct ion , m a y be con sider ed by t h e [c]ou r t bu t a r e n ot disposit ive.”). 2. L B R Y’s B u s in e s s Mo d e l As I ju st la id ou t , LBRY m a de n o secr et in it s com m u n ica t ion s wit h pot en t ia l in vest or s t h a t it expect ed LBC t o gr ow in va lu e t h r ou gh it s m a n a ger ia l a n d en t r epr en eu r ia l effor t s. Bu t even if it h a d n ever explicit ly br oa dca st it s views on t h e su bject , a n y r ea son a ble in vest or wh o wa s fa m ilia r wit h t h e com pa n y’s bu sin ess m odel wou ld h a ve u n der st ood t h e con n ect ion . F r om it s in cept ion , LBRY’s pr ofit a bilit y t u r n ed on it s a bilit y t o gr ow t h e va lu e of LBC by in cr ea sin g u sa ge of t h e LBRY Net wor k. As Ka u ffm a n expla in ed in a n Oct ober 2016 in for m a l bu sin ess pla n , LBC wa s t h e m ea n s by wh ich LBRY a n d ot h er ea r ly a dopt er s wou ld be a ble t o pr ofit a s u se of t h e n et wor k in cr ea sed. See LBRY P la n , Doc. No. 62-2 a t 9. Th is wa s beca u se “[e]a ch per cen t a ge of [LBC] ca n be t h ou gh t of a s h a vin g a va lu e pr opor t ion a l t o t h e su m of a ll in for m a t ion t r a n sa ct ed t h r ou gh t h e n et wor k.” Id. In ot h er wor ds, a s dem a n d for in for m a t ion st or ed on t h e blockch a in in cr ea sed, so t oo 15 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 16 of 22 wou ld LBC’s va lu e. Accor din gly, Ka u ffm a n r ea son ed, “[g]iven t h is sit u a t ion , t h e m ost r ea son a ble pa t h t o pr ofit is t o r eser ve a por t ion of t h e cr ypt ocu r r en cy.” Id. La t er in t h e sa m e pla n , h e discu ssed t h e com pa n y’s liqu ida t ion va lu e by st a t in g “[s]in ce LBRY’s m ost sign ifica n t a sset will be it s cr edit s, it cou ld sim ply liqu ify t h ese cr edit s a t a r et u r n of 10-10,000x on a n y in vest m en t .” Id. a t 10. Sim ila r ly, in a post on it s websit e t it led “An swer s t o Big Qu est ion s F r om ou r Reddit AMA,” LBRY r espon ded t o t h e qu est ion “H ow does t h e com pa n y beh in d LBRY m a k e m on ey?” by st a t in g: Th e LBRY pr ot ocol h a s a bu ilt -in digit a l cu r r en cy t h a t a llows it t o fu n ct ion , ca lled LBRY Cr edit s. Th ese Cr edit s a r e ver y sim ila r t o bit coin s. H a vin g a bu ilt -in digit a l cu r r en cy cr ea t es a n oppor t u n it y for a n ew kin d of bu sin ess t h a t h a s n ever exist ed: t h e pr ot ocolfir st en t er pr ise . . . LBRY In c. h a s r eser ved 10% of a ll LBRY Cr edit s t o fu n d con t in u ed developm en t a n d pr ovide pr ofit for t h e fou n der s. Sin ce Cr edit s on ly ga in va lu e a s t h e u se of t h e pr ot ocol gr ows, t h e com pa n y h a s a n in cen t ive t o con t in u e developin g t h is open -sou r ce pr oject . 9/28/2016 LBRY Ar t icle, Doc. No. 57-8. Th e pr oblem for LBRY is n ot ju st t h a t a r ea son a ble pu r ch a ser of LBC wou ld u n der st a n d t h a t t h e t oken s bein g offer ed r epr esen t ed in vest m en t oppor t u n it ies - even if LBRY n ever sa id a wor d a bou t it . It is t h a t , by r et a in in g h u n dr eds of m illion s of LBC for it self, LBRY a lso sign a led t h a t it wa s m ot iva t ed t o wor k t ir elessly t o im pr ove t h e va lu e of it s blockch a in for it self a n d a n y LBC pu r ch a ser s. Th is st r u ct u r e, wh ich a n y r ea son a ble 16 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 17 of 22 pu r ch a ser wou ld u n der st a n d, wou ld lea d pu r ch a ser s of LBC t o expect t h a t t h ey t oo wou ld pr ofit fr om t h eir h oldin gs of LBC a s a r esu lt of LBRY’s a ssidu ou s effor t s. Sim ply pu t , by in t er t win in g LBRY’s fin a n cia l fa t e wit h t h e com m er cia l su ccess of LBC, LBRY m a de it obviou s t o it s in vest or s t h a t it wou ld wor k diligen t ly t o develop t h e Net wor k so t h a t LBC wou ld in cr ea se in va lu e. As LBRY sa id, “[o]ver t h e lon g-t er m , t h e in t er est s of LBRY a n d t h e h older s of Cr edit s a r e a lign ed.” See 7/15/2016 LBRY Ar t icle, Doc. No. 57-11. Th e SE C’s bu r den is m a de a ll t h e ea sier by st a t em en t s LBRY m a de a bou t it s m a n a ger ia l effor t s, like h ow “t h e lon g-t er m va lu e pr oposit ion of LBRY is . . . depen den t on ou r t ea m st a yin g focu sed on t h e t a sk a t h a n d: bu ildin g t h is t h in g.” See id. By it s own a ccou n t , LBRY expen ded sign ifica n t m a n a ger ia l effor t s t o develop it s Net wor k a n d in cr ea se t h e va lu e of LBC. 3. C o n s u m p t iv e U s e s fo r L B C LBRY’s pr im a r y r espon se t o t h e SE C’s cla im st a r t s wit h t wo gen er a lly u n con t est ed fa ct s: (1) LBC is a u t ilit y t oken design ed for u se on t h e LBRY Blockch a in , a n d (2) som e u n kn own n u m ber of pu r ch a ser s of LBC a cqu ir ed it a t lea st in pa r t wit h t h e in t en t ion of u sin g it r a t h er t h a n h oldin g it a s a n in vest m en t . Bu ildin g fr om t h er e, LBRY lea ps t o t h e con clu sion t h a t LBC ca n n ot be a secu r it y even if LBRY offer ed it a s a n in vest m en t . LBRY is m ist a ken a bou t bot h t h e fa ct s a n d t h e la w. 17 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 18 of 22 Not h in g in t h e ca se la w su ggest s t h a t a t oken wit h bot h con su m pt ive a n d specu la t ive u ses ca n n ot be sold a s a n in vest m en t con t r a ct . Despit e LBRY’s in sist en ce t o t h e con t r a r y, I ca n n ot r eject t h e SE C’s con t en t ion t h a t LBRY offer ed LBC a s a secu r it y sim ply beca u se som e LBC pu r ch a ses wer e m a de wit h con su m pt ive in t en t . Wer e it ot h er wise, t h e Secu r it ies Act wou ld be u n a ble t o a da pt t o t h e “cou n t less a n d va r ia ble sch em es devised by t h ose wh o seek t h e u se of t h e m on ey of ot h er s on t h e pr om ise of pr ofit s” wh er ever a t oken h eld som e con su m pt ive u t ilit y. See H owey, 328 U.S. a t 299. Accor din gly, st a t em en t s fr om a su bset of LBC h older s t h a t t h ey pu r ch a sed LBC for u se on t h e LBRY Blockch a in is of lim it ed r eleva n ce in det er m in in g wh et h er LBRY offer ed it a s a secu r it y. See Wa r field, 569 F .3d a t 1021 (“[W]h ile t h e su bject ive in t en t of t h e pu r ch a ser s m a y h a ve som e bea r in g on t h e issu e of wh et h er t h ey en t er ed in t o in vest m en t con t r a ct s, we m u st focu s ou r in qu ir y on wh a t t h e pu r ch a ser s wer e offer ed or pr om ised.”). In su m m a r y, wh a t t h e eviden ce in t h e r ecor d discloses is t h a t LBRY pr om ot ed LBC a s a n in vest m en t t h a t wou ld gr ow in va lu e over t im e t h r ou gh t h e com pa n y’s developm en t of t h e LBRY Net wor k . Wh ile som e u n kn own n u m ber of pu r ch a ser s m a y h a ve a cqu ir ed LBC in pa r t for con su m pt ive 18 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 19 of 22 pu r poses, t h is does n ot ch a n ge t h e fa ct t h a t t h e object ive econ om ic r ea lit ies of LBRY’s offer in gs of LBC est a blish t h a t it wa s offer in g it a s a secu r it y. 4 B . D id L B R Y R e c e iv e F a ir N o t ic e ? LBRY a r gu es t h a t I sh ou ld n on et h eless den y t h e SE C’s m ot ion beca u se it did n ot r eceive fa ir n ot ice t h a t it s offer in gs wer e su bject t o t h e secu r it ies la ws. In pr essin g t h is a r gu m en t , LBRY h a s a ba n don ed a n y br oa d cla im t h a t it la cked fa ir n ot ice of t h e wa y in wh ich t h e H owey t est a pplies t o digit a l t oken s in gen er a l. Def.’s Obj., Doc. No. 74 a t 24. In st ea d, it com pla in s t h a t it la cked fa ir n ot ice beca u se, u n t il t h e SE C br ou gh t t h is a ct ion , “t h e Com m ission h ist or ica lly a n d con sist en t ly focu sed it s gu ida n ce, a s well a s it s en for cem en t effor t s, exclu sively on t h e issu a n ce of digit a l a sset s in t h e con t ext of a n [In it ia l Coin Offer in g] ICO.” Id. Th e pr in cipa l pr oblem wit h LBRY’s fa ir n ot ice a r gu m en t is t h a t it offer s n ot h in g m or e t o su ppor t it s posit ion t h a n it s ba ld cla im t h a t t h is is t h e fir st ca se in wh ich t h e SE C h a s a t t em pt ed t o en for ce t h e r egist r a t ion r equ ir em en t a ga in st a n issu er of digit a l t oken s t h a t did n ot con du ct a n ICO. 4 LBRY a r gu es in t h e a lt er n a t ive t h a t it sh ou ld n ot be r equ ir ed t o r egist er fu t u r e offer in gs of LBC even if it s pr ior offer in gs wer e su bject t o Sect ion 5’s r egist r a t ion r equ ir em en t . I declin e t o a ddr ess t h is a r gu m en t on t h e pr esen t r ecor d beca u se LBRY h a s n ot expla in ed wh y possible fu t u r e offer in gs of LBC sh ou ld be t r ea t ed differ en t ly fr om t h e com pa n y’s pa st offer in gs. 19 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 20 of 22 LBRY does n ot poin t t o a n y specific st a t em en t by t h e SE C su ggest in g t h a t com pa n ies n eed on ly com ply wit h t h e r egist r a t ion r equ ir em en t if t h ey con du ct a n ICO. Nor does LBRY offer a n y per su a sive r ea din g of H owey t h a t wou ld ca u se a r ea son a ble issu er t o con clu de t h a t on ly ICOs a r e su bject t o t h e r egist r a t ion r equ ir em en t . Th e t est ou t lin ed in H owey is n ecessa r ily a fa ct specific on e, in wh ich n o sin gle fa ct will likely be disposit ive. Wh ile pa r t icipa t ion in a n ICO m a y be r eleva n t t o t h e a n a lysis, it will n ot det er m in e t h e ou t com e in a ca se like t h is, wh er e t h e u n dispu t ed eviden ce lea ves n o dou bt t h a t LBRY offer ed a n d sold LBC a s a secu r it y. LBRY r elies on t h e Secon d Cir cu it ’s decision in Upt on v. SE C for t h e pr oposit ion t h a t t h e SE C m a y n ot im pose a sa n ct ion for viola t in g t h e secu r it ies la ws “pu r su a n t t o a su bst a n t ia l ch a n ge in it s en for cem en t policy t h a t wa s n ot r ea son a bly com m u n ica t ed t o t h e pu blic.” See 75 F .3d 92, 98 (2n d Cir . 1996). Bu t , a s t h e SE C n ot es, t h e fa ct s of Upt on bea r n o r esem bla n ce t o t h e pr esen t ca se. Upt on in volved a n a t t em pt by t h e SE C t o sa n ct ion t h e CF O of a br ok er a ge fir m for viola t in g a n SE C r u le t h a t est a blish ed a for m u la for set t in g t h e a m ou n t of m on ey t h a t t h e br oker a ge wa s r equ ir ed t o m a in t a in in a cu st om er r eser ve a ccou n t . Id. a t 93. Alt h ou gh it wa s u n dispu t ed t h a t t h e br oker a ge h a d a t a ll t im es com plied wit h t h e “lit er a l t er m s” of t h e r u le, a n a dm in ist r a t ive la w ju dge r elied on a n ovel in t er pr et a t ion of t h e r u le by t h e SE C t o con clu de t h a t t h e CF O cou ld be sa n ct ion ed. Id. a t 94-96. Beca u se t h e 20 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 21 of 22 SE C did n ot give pu blic n ot ice of it s n ew in t er pr et a t ion u n t il a ft er t h e br oker a ge h a d en ded it s offen sive pr a ct ice, t h e Secon d Cir cu it va ca t ed t h e sa n ct ion im posed by t h e Com m ission . Id. a t 98. Th e pr esen t ca se is obviou sly qu it e differ en t fr om t h e pr oblem t h e cou r t con fr on t ed in U pt on . Th e SE C h a s n ot ba sed it s en for cem en t a ct ion h er e on a n ovel in t er pr et a t ion of a r u le t h a t by it s t er m s does n ot expr essly pr oh ibit t h e r eleva n t con du ct . In st ea d, t h e SE C h a s ba sed it s cla im on a st r a igh t for wa r d a pplica t ion of a ven er a ble Su pr em e Cou r t pr eceden t t h a t h a s been a pplied by h u n dr eds of feder a l cou r t s a cr oss t h e cou n t r y over m or e t h a n 70 yea r s. Wh ile t h is m a y be t h e fir st t im e it h a s been u sed a ga in st a n issu er of digit a l t oken s t h a t did n ot con du ct a n ICO, LBRY is in n o posit ion t o cla im t h a t it did n ot r eceive fa ir n ot ice t h a t it s con du ct wa s u n la wfu l. I V. CONCLUSION As I h a ve expla in ed, t h e on ly issu es r a ised by t h e pa r t ies’ cr oss-m ot ion s for su m m a r y ju dgm en t a r e wh et h er LBRY offer ed LBC a s a secu r it y a n d wh et h er LBRY r eceived fa ir n ot ice t h a t it n eeded t o r egist er it s offer in gs. Beca u se n o r ea son a ble t r ier of fa ct cou ld r eject t h e SE C’s con t en t ion t h a t LBRY offer ed LBC a s a secu r it y, a n d LBRY does n ot h a ve a t r ia ble defen se t h a t it la cked fa ir n ot ice, t h e SE C is en t it led t o ju dgm en t . Th e SE C’s Mot ion for Su m m a r y J u dgm en t (Doc. No. 55) is gr a n t ed, a n d LBRY’s Mot ion for 21 Case 1:21-cv-00260-PB Document 86 Filed 11/07/22 Page 22 of 22 Su m m a r y J u dgm en t (Doc. N o. 61) is den ied. Th e Cler k sh a ll sch edu le a st a t u s con fer en ce t o discu ss t h e pr ocess for r esolvin g a n y r em a in in g issu es. SO ORDE RE D. /s/ P a u l J . Ba r ba dor o P a u l J . Ba r ba dor o Un it ed St a t es Dist r ict J u dge Novem ber 7, 2022 cc: Cou n sel of Recor d 22
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
