Equitec-Schwartz, LLC v. Tyco International, Ltd. et al, No. 1:2009cv01336 - Document 24 (D.N.H. 2010)
Court Description: AGREED ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AGAINST DEFENDANT MARK SWARTZ Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (mxm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Equitec-Schwartz, LLC v. Tyco International, Ltd. et al Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE EQUITEC-SCHWARTZ, LLC MDL No.: 02-1335 09-CV-01336-PB Plaintiff, v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD.; TYCO ELECTRONICS LTD.; COVIDIEN LTD.; COVIDIEN (U.S.); L. DENNIS KOZLOWSKI; MARK H. SWARTZ; and FRANK E. WALSH, JR., Defendants. AGREED ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AGAINST DEFENDANT MARK H. SWARTZ Plaintiff Equitec-Schwartz, LLC ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Mark H. Swartz (each of them a "Settling Party" and collectively, the "Settling Parties"), having represented to the Court that they have entered into a settlement agreement that resolves all issues between and among them in the Complaint, and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS: 1. Pursuant to Section 21 D-4(f)(7XA) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,15 U.S.C. ยง 78u-4(f)(7)(A): (a) defendants, L. .Dennis Kozlowski, Frank E. Walsh, Jr., Tyco International Ltd., Tyco Electronics Ltd., Covidien Ltd. and Covidien (U.S.) (collectively, the "Non-Settling Defendants"), and each of them, are hereby permanently barred, enjoined, and restrained from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any claim for or otherwise seeking contribution against any Settling Party based upon, relating to, or arising out of the subject matter, allegations, transactions, facts, matters, occurrences, representations or omissions alleged, involved, set forth or referred to in the Complaint in this suit; and (b) except as provided in paragraph 6(c) of the accompanying Settlement Agreement and Release, each Settling Party is hereby permanently barred, enjoined, and restrained ftom commencing, prosecuting, or asserting Dockets.Justia.com any claim for or otherwise seeking contribution for any amount paid in connection with this action against any other person based upon, relating to, or arising out of the subject matter, allegations, transactions, facts, matters, occurrences, representations or omissions alleged, involved, set forth or referred to in the Complaint in the suit. 2. Because there is no just reason for the delaying the entry of a final judgment with respect to the claims asserted by Plaintiff against the Settling Parties, all claims asserted by Plaintiff against the Settling Parties in the Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). 3. The Clerk is directed to enter this Agreed Order and Final Judgment of Dismissal against Mark H. Swartz and Bar Order as afinaljudgment and send a copy of same to all counsel ofrecord. IT IS SO ORDERED. Enter: May 3, 2010 /s/ Paul Barbadoro The Hon. Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge cc: Counsel of Record i 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
