Spisak v. Gurrero et al, No. 3:2008cv00474 - Document 8 (D. Nev. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the 6 Court's Order. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice . The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 08/13/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Spisak v. Gurrero et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 JOHN SPISAK, 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 C/O GUERRERO, et al., 10 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:08-cv-0474-HDM-VPC ORDER 11 On June 23, 2009, this Court entered an order (#6) requiring plaintiff’s to submit an amended 12 complaint containing all the claims that he wished to pursue in this litigation. Plaintiff had up to and 13 including July 23, 2009, in which to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order. 14 The Court further advised plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in dismissal 15 of his action. On July 27, 2009, plaintiff submitted an “affidavit” (#7) making various unfounded 16 allegations and complaints about a judicial conspiracy to frame him for various crimes. Plaintiff has not 17 submitted an amended complaint and has failed to comply with the Court’s order. 18 19 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter final judgment accordingly. DATED: August 13, 2009. 21 22 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
