Nelson v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc., No. 2:2023cv01434 - Document 12 (D. Nev. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER granting 11 Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES (FIRST REQUEST). Discovery due by 6/12/2024. Motions due by 7/12/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/12/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 12/27/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Nelson v. Smith&#039;s Food & Drug Centers, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 12 JERRY S. BUSBY Nevada Bar #001107 ANDRE T. MARQURES Nevada Bar #014737 COOPER LEVENSON, P.A. 3016 West Charleston Boulevard - #195 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 (702) 366-1125 FAX: (702) 366-1857 jbusby@cooperlevenson.com amarques@cooperlevenson.com Attorneys for Defendant SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 NANCY NELSON, individually, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. d/b/a SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG #399; DOES 1 through 100 and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 100, inclusive, 14 Case No. 2:23-cv-01434-CDS-DJA 15 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 16 17 Good cause is present for the stipulation under LR 26-3. 18 Plaintiff is alleging significant injuries in this case. In her most recent disclosure, served on 19 October 24, 2023, Plaintiff alleged her past medical bills are $117,684.16. In addition, Plaintiff 20 sought treatment at twenty-two (22) medical providers for treatment allegedly related to the subject 21 incident. 22 Thus, additional time is needed to collect Plaintiff’s voluminous medical records and allow 23 more time for expert disclosures. Just given the sheer number of medical providers involved in this 24 case, there is not enough time to collect these records and forward them to the expert witnesses so 25 that they can include the records in their initial expert reports. 26 Moreover, Plaintiff requested a two-week extension to respond to written discovery, which 27 Defendant granted. Therefore, additional time is needed to take Plaintiff’s deposition, and gather 28 additional medical records. CLAC 7697782.1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Further, Plaintiff has requested dates for Plaintiff’s expert to perform a site inspection of the 2 area where the subject incident occurred, but Defendant wants to depose Plaintiff before providing 3 Plaintiff with available dates, a request the parties still need to meet and confer about. The current 4 holiday season has also created additional impediments in conducting portions of discovery, 5 obtaining records from non-parties, and retaining experts. 6 Pursuant to LR 26-3, stipulations to extend discovery must be supported by good cause for 7 the extension. A request made within 21 days of the expiration of a deadline that the parties seek to 8 extend must also be supported by a showing of good cause. See LR 26-3. To establish good cause, 9 the Court looks to the diligence of the party that seeks the extension. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Air 10 Vent, Inc., Case No. 2:20-01579, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95692, *1 (May 19, 2021) (citing Coleman 11 v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1294-95 (9th Cir. 2000)). Good cause is present if the deadline 12 at issue “cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension." Johnson 13 v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 608-09 (9th Cir. 1992). 14 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between PAUL G. ALBRIGHT, ESQ., of the law 15 firm NAQVI INJURY LAW, as counsel for Plaintiff, NANCY NELSON, and ANDRE T. 16 MARQUES, ESQ., of the law firm COOPER LEVENSON, P.A., as counsel for Defendant, 17 SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC., that certain discovery deadlines be extended by 90 18 days, as set forth below, to allow the parties to complete discovery prior to trial. 19 STATEMENT SPECIFYING THE DISCOVERY THAT HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 20 1. The parties participated in the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference on October 10, 2023; 21 2. Plaintiff served her Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.1(a)(1) initial disclosure on October 24, 2023; 22 3. Defendant served its Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.1(a)(1) initial disclosure on November 15, 2023; 23 4. Defendant served Plaintiff with written discovery including interrogatories, requests for 24 25 26 27 28 admissions, and requests for production of documents on November 17, 2023; 5. Plaintiff served Defendant with written discovery including interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on November 27, 2023; 6. Defendant has sent authorizations to Plaintiff, and is still in the process of collecting all of Plaintiff’s medical records. 2 CLAC 7697782.1 7. Plaintiff has retained a liability expert and requested a site inspection of the store where the 1 subject incident occurred. 2 A. SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE 3 4 COMPLETED. 5 1. Deposition of Plaintiff. 6 2. Deposition of SMITH’S fact witnesses. 7 3. Deposition of Plaintiff treating physicians. 8 4. Deposition of SMITH’S Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative. 9 5. Defendant to identify and collect Plaintiff’s medical records. 10 6. Parties to retain and designate expert witnesses. 11 7. Depositions of expert witnesses. 12 8. Site inspection. 13 B. REASONS WHY THE DISCOVERY REMAINING WAS NOT COMPLETED 14 WITHIN THE DEADLINES CONTAINED IN THE DISCOVERY SCHEDULING 15 ORDER 16 Pursuant to LR 26-3, good cause is present for the stipulation. This is a premise liability action 17 and Plaintiff is alleging significant injuries. Recently, Plaintiff requested an extension to serve her 18 discovery responses, and Defendant has yet to notice her deposition. Defendant will need additional time 19 to send authorizations to Plaintiff’s medical providers and gather and review Plaintiff’s medical records. 20 Therefore, the parties in this matter respectfully request a ninety (90) day extension of discovery 21 deadlines to allow enough time for the parties to gather medical records, depose witnesses, including 22 treating medical providers, and to complete discovery as a whole. 23 Simply put, the Defendant cannot take Plaintiff’s deposition, recover all of Plaintiff’s relevant 24 medical records, and have those records examined by its expert witnesses for their reports under the 25 current Scheduling Order. Similarly, Plaintiff has requested dates for Plaintiff’s expert to perform a site 26 inspection of the area where the subject incident occurred, but Defendant wants to depose Plaintiff 27 before providing Plaintiff with available dates, which the parties still need to meet and confer about. 28 /// 3 CLAC 7697782.1 Plaintiff’s liability expert will not be able to develop his opinions and draft his report until 1 2 Defendant allows Plaintiff to perform the requested inspection. Lastly, the current holiday season has 3 created additional impediments in conducting portions of discovery, obtaining records from non-parties, 4 and retaining experts. C. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING ALL REMAINING DISCOVERY 5 As a result of the above, it is requested that the discovery deadlines in this case be continued 90 6 7 days from their present deadlines. 1. Discovery Cut-Off Date: The parties jointly propose that the discovery cut-off date be 8 9 extended from its present deadline of March 12, 2024, to Wednesday, June 12, 2024. 10 2. Amending the Pleadings and Adding Parties: The parties do not seek to extend this 11 deadline, but reserve the right to bring an appropriate motion in the future in the unlikely event that new 12 information is found in discovery that creates the need to amend the pleadings. 3. Fed. R. Civ. P. 2(a)(2) Disclosures (Experts): The parties jointly propose that the initial 13 14 expert disclosure deadline be extended from its present deadline of January 12, 2024, to Thursday, 15 April 11, 2024; the rebuttal expert disclosure be extended from its present deadline of February 12, 16 2024, to Monday, May 13, 2024. 17 4. Dispositive Motions: In the event that the discovery period is extended from the 18 discovery cut-off date set forth in the proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, the date for filing 19 dispositive motions shall be extended from its present deadline of April 11, 2024, to Friday, July 12, 20 2024. 21 5. Pretrial Order: The date for filing the joint pretrial order shall not be later than August 22 12, 2024, 30 days after the cut-off date for filing dispositive motions. In the event that dispositive 23 motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be suspended until 30 days after 24 decision on the dispositive motions or until further order of the court. In the further event that the 25 discovery period is extended from the discovery cut-off date set forth in the Discovery Plan and 26 Scheduling Order, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be extended in accordance with the 27 time periods set forth in this paragraph. 28 /// 4 CLAC 7697782.1 6. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Disclosures: The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 2 26(a)(3), and any objections thereto, shall be included in the joint pretrial order. 3 7. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Counsel for the parties certify that they met and 4 conferred about the possibility of using alternative dispute resolution including mediation, arbitration, 5 and/or an early neutral evaluation. The parties have not scheduled any such ADR forum at this point, but 6 agree to reconsider following the disclosure of expert witness reports and after the close of discovery. 7 8. Alternative Forms of Case Disposition: The parties certify that they discussed 8 consenting to trial by a magistrate judge or engaging in the Short Trial Program under Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 9 and at present do not consent to either alternative form of case disposition. 10 9. Electronic Evidence: The parties certify that they have discussed and intend to use 11 electronic evidence at the trial of this matter and will ensure that said evidence is in an electronic format 12 compatible with the Court’s electronic jury evidence display system. At present, the parties have not 13 agreed upon any stipulations regarding the use of electronic evidence but will address this issue again in 14 the Pre-Trial Order. 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 5 CLAC 7697782.1 1 10. Extensions or Modifications of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order: Any 2 stipulation or motion must be made no later than 21 days before the subject deadline. Requests to 3 extend discovery deadlines must comply fully with LR 26-3. 4 Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of December, 2023. 5 NAQVI INJURY LAW COOPER LEVENSON, P.A 6 /s/ Paul G. Albright PAUL G. ALBRIGHT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 014159 9500 West Flamingo Road, Suite 104 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 (702) 553-1000 Attorneys for Plaintiff NANCY NELSON /s/ Andre T. Marques JERRY S. BUSBY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 001107 ANDRE T. MARQUES, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 014737 3016 W. Charleston Blvd.-Suite 195 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 (702) 366-1125 Attorneys for Defendant SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 ORDER 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED that the discovery deadlines are hereby extended as follows: 15 16 17 18 Scheduled Event New Deadlines Amend Pleadings and add Parties Closed Initial Expert Disclosure April 11, 2024 Disclosure of Rebuttal Experts May 13, 2024 Discovery Cutoff June 12, 2024 Dispositive Motions July 12, 2024 Joint Proposed Pre-trial Order August 12, 2024 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/27/2023 DATED: ____________________________ 26 27 28 6 CLAC 7697782.1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
