Ibuumerang, LLC v. T1 Payments LLC et al, No. 2:2021cv01611 - Document 23 (D. Nev. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER granting 22 Stipulation Re: 15 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 12/6/2021. Replies due by 12/20/2021. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ibuumerang, LLC v. T1 Payments LLC et al Doc. 23 Case 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF Document 22 Filed 11/24/21 Page 1 of 4 Bradley S. Slighting (10225) 1 SLIGHTING LAW 2 1707 Village Center Cir, Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89134 3 Tel: (702) 840-3749 brad@slightinglaw.com 4 Scott Wellman (Pro Hac Vice Pending) 5 WELLMAN & WARREN LLP 6 24411 Ridge Route, Suite 200 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 7 Tel: (949) 580-3737 swellman@w-wlaw.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 IBUUMERANG 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 CASE NO. 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF 14 IBUUMERANG, LLC, a Texas Limited 15 Liability Company 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT PAYVISION B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS vs. T1 PAYMENTS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; T1 PAYMENTS LIMITED, a United Kingdom private limited company; TGLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED, a United Kingdom private limited company; DONALD KASDON, an individual; DEBRA KAREN KING aka DEBRA KAREN KASDON, an individual; AMBER FAIRCHILD, an individual; PAYVISION B.V., a Netherlands limited company; PIXXLES, Ltd., a United Kingdom private limited company and CETLER, a Netherlands limited liability company 26 Defendants. 27 28 -1STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT PAYVISION B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF Document 22 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 4 1 Plaintiff, Ibuumerang, LLC. (“Ibuumerang”) and Defendant Payvision B.V. (“Payvision”) 2 hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 3 WHEREAS, Defendant Payvision B.V. filed their FRCP Rule 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), 9(b) Motion 4 to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (the “Motion”)(ECF No. 15) on November 12, 2021. 5 WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition is November 29, 2021. 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel is out of the country on a pre-arranged trip until November 7 30, 2021. 8 WHEREAS, the parties have not stipulated to any prior continuances. 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel and Defendant’s counsel met and conferred via telephone 10 and agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file their opposition to December 6, 2021 as long 11 as the deadline for Defendant to file their reply is extended to December 20, 2021. 12 WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Ibuumerang 13 and Defendant, through their respective counsel of record that good cause exists to extend the 14 deadline for Ibuumerang’s opposition from November 29, 2021 to December 6, 2021 and to extend 15 the deadline for Defendant’s reply from December 13, 2021 to December 20, 2021. 16 17 DATED: November 24, 2021 SLIGHTING LAW 18 19 By: 20 21 _/s/ Bradley S. Slighting___________ Bradley S. Slighting, Esq. Plaintiff, Ibuumerang, LLC. 22 23 DATED: November 24, 2021 WELLMAN & WARREN 24 By: 25 26 _/s/ Scott Wellman_______________ Scott Wellman, Esq. Plaintiff, Ibuumerang, LLC. 27 28 -2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT PAYVISION B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Case 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF Document 22 Filed 11/24/21 Page 3 of 4 1 DATED: November 24, 2021 GIIBS GIDEN LOCHER TURNER SENET & 2 WITTBRODT 3 4 5 By: _/s/Richard Edward Haskin Richard Edward Haskin, Esq. Defendant, Payvision B.V. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT PAYVISION B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Case 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF Document 22 Filed 11/24/21 Page 4 of 4 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America that on 3 4 this date, I caused to be electronically filed the foregoing document, and this Certificate of ECF 5 Filing & Service, with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, who will send notification 6 of such filing to the following party: 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 ARI N. ROTHMAN, VENABLE LLP; anrothman@venable.com 10 11 12 KORY L. KAPLAN, KAPLAN COTTNER; kory@kaplancottner.com Attorneys for T1 Payments LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 RICHARD EDWARD HASKIN, GIIBS GIDEN LOCHER TURNER SENET & WITTBRODT Nathan D. O’Malley, Peter J. Diedrich, Giorgio A. Sassine, MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP Attorneys for PayVision B.V., a Netherlands Limited Company. 19 20 DATED this 24th day of November 2021, at Laguna Hills, California. 21 22 23 /s/ Kelsey Schafer ___ Paralegal 24 25 26 27 28 1 Proof Of Service Case 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF Document 22-1 Filed 11/24/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Bradley S. Slighting (10225) SLIGHTING LAW 1707 Vilage Center Cir, Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89134 Tel: (702) 840-3749 brad@slightinglaw.com Scott Wellman (Pro Hac Vice Pending) WELLMAN & WARREN LLP 24411 Ridge Route, Suite 200 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Tel: (949) 580-3737 swellman@w-wlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, IBUUMERANG _____ 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 IBUUMERANG, INC. a Texas Limited 14 Liability Company Case No. 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF 15 Judge: Hon. James C. Mahan Magistrate Judge: Cam Ferenbach Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 vs. T1 PAYMENTS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; T1 PAYMENTS LIMITED, a United Kingdom private limited company; TGLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED, a United Kingdom private limited company; DONALD KASDON, an individual; DEBRA KAREN KING aka DEBRA KAREN KASDON, an individual; AMBER FAIRCHILD, an individual; PAYVISION B.V., a Netherlands limited company; Pixxles, Ltd., a United Kingdom private limited company [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT PAYVISION B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 26 27 The Court having received, reviewed, and considered the parties’ 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT PAYVISION B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Case 2:21-cv-01611-JCM-VCF Document 22-1 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Stipulation to Continue the deadline to file opposition and reply to Defendant 2 Payvision B.V.’s Motion to Dismiss. 3 NOW THEREFORE, for good cause shown, the Court hereby APPROVES the 4 Stipulation to extend Ibuumerang’s opposition from November 29, 2021 to December 5 6, 2021 and to extend the deadline for Defendant’s reply from December 13, 2021 to 6 December 20, 2021. 7 8 SO ORDERED: 9 November 30, 2021 10 Date: ________________ 11 HON. JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT PAYVISION B.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
