Pasiecznik v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 2:2020cv02202 - Document 42 (D. Nev. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER Denying 41 Stipulated Protective Order without prejudice. The parties may refile a proposed stipulated protective order that is consistent with federal law (including but not limited to Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) and Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2016). Additionally, all future filings must comply with LR IA 10-1(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ABG)

Download PDF
Pasiecznik v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Doc. 42 Case 2:20-cv-02202-RFB-BNW Document 42 41 Filed 12/06/21 12/03/21 Page 1 of 7 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-02202-RFB-BNW Document 42 41 Filed 12/06/21 12/03/21 Page 2 of 7 Case 2:20-cv-02202-RFB-BNW Document 42 41 Filed 12/06/21 12/03/21 Page 3 of 7 Case 2:20-cv-02202-RFB-BNW Document 42 41 Filed 12/06/21 12/03/21 Page 4 of 7 Case 2:20-cv-02202-RFB-BNW Document 42 41 Filed 12/06/21 12/03/21 Page 5 of 7 Case 2:20-cv-02202-RFB-BNW Document 42 41 Filed 12/06/21 12/03/21 Page 6 of 7 December 3, Order IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 41 is DENIED without prejudice. The parties may refile a proposed stipulated protective order that is consistent with federal law (including but not limited to Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) and Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2016). Additionally, all future filings must comply with LR IA 10-1(b). IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: 10:52 am, December 06, 2021 BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 2:20-cv-02202-RFB-BNW Document 42 41 Filed 12/06/21 12/03/21 Page 7 of 7

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.