Ruisi v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC, No. 2:2020cv01544 - Document 93 (D. Nev. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER granting 92 Stipulation Joint Stipulation for Dismissal documents are due by 10/20/2021. Status Conference is set for 10/25/2021 at 10:00 AM via Videoconference before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. The 8/26/2021 Hearing is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF

Ruisi v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC 1 2 3 4 Doc. 93 JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. 6375 VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. 13382 KEMP & KEMP 7435 W. Azure Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, NV 89130 Tel: 702-258-1183 Fax: 702-258-6983 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Natalie Ruisi 5 6 7 8 BROOKE A. BOHLKE, STATE BAR NO. 9374 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 2881 Business Park Court, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89128-9020 Tel: 702.251.4127 Fax: 702.251.5405 Email: BBohlke@wshblaw.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 JASON S. MILLS (admitted pro hac vice) GEORGE S. BENJAMIN (admitted pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Twenty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 Tel: 213.612.2500 Fax: 213.612.2501 Email: jason.mills@morganlewis.com george.benjamin@morganlewis.com Attorney for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NATALIE RUISI, DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No. 2:20-CV-01544-JCM-VCF Plaintiff, vs. ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; ARAMARK CAMPUS, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL GROUP, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., a Foreign Corporation; and, ROE Business Organizations I-X; and DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X, Inclusive, Defendants. JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY ALL PENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND HEARINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Magistrate Judge: Hon. Cam Ferenbach Trial Date: None Set 28 1 Case No. 2:20-CV-01544-JCM-VCF JT. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & JT. STIP. TO STAY ALL PENDING DEADLINES AND HEARINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 This Joint Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff 3 Natalie Ruisi (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Aramark Campus, LLC, et al. (“Defendants”), by and 4 through their respective counsel of record, based upon the following facts establishing good cause: 5 RECITALS 1. 6 7 WHEREAS, on May 10, 2021, this Court issued an Order setting several discovery deadlines [ECF No. 79] (“Discovery Order”); 2. 8 WHEREAS, on May 19, 2021, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Compel Responses To 9 Plaintiff’s First, Second and Third Sets of Interrogatories and First And Second Sets of Requests 10 for Production of Documents [ECF No. 82]; and her Motion for Leave To File Confidential 11 Documents Under Seal [ECF No. 83] (collectively “Motions”); 3. 12 WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation informing the 13 Court that in light of the Parties’ good faith attempt to resolve this matter at mediation, the Parties 14 agreed to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motions, and that should the Parties not resolve this 15 matter at mediation, the Parties will submit a new discovery schedule for the Court’s approval. 4. 16 17 WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the Court vacated the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motions and set a new hearing date for August 26, 2021 [ECF No. 89]; 18 5. WHEREAS, on August 9, 2021, the Parties attended mediation in good faith; 19 6. WHEREAS, on August 12, 2021, the Parties reached an agreement of the material 20 terms of settlement and are currently negotiating the specific terms of the Parties’ settlement 21 agreement; 7. 22 23 WHEREAS, the Parties anticipate filing a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for the Court’s approval within 60 days; 8. 24 WHEREAS, in light of this settlement in principal, counsel for the Parties have met 25 and conferred and agree that the Court’s discovery deadlines set forth in the Discovery Order, as 26 well as the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motions should be stayed until the Court rules on the forthcoming 27 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. 28 /// 2 Case No. 2:20-CV-01544-JCM-VCF JT. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & JT. STIP. TO STAY ALL PENDING DEADLINES AND HEARINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned Parties through their respective counsel of record that: 1. The Parties shall file a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for the Court’s approval within 60 days; 2. The Parties request that the Court schedule a status conference in 60 days, to be vacated upon the Parties filing a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice; and 3. The discovery deadlines set forth in the Court’s Discovery Order, as well as the August 26, 2021 hearing on Plaintiff’s Motions be stayed until the Court rules on the Parties’ forthcoming Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 19, 2021 KEMP & KEMP 13 By: 14 15 /s/ Victoria L. Neal James P. Kemp Victoria L. Neal Attorneys for Plaintiff Natalie Ruisi 16 17 Dated: August 19, 2021 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 18 19 20 21 By /s/ George S. Benjamin Jason S. Mills George S. Benjamin Attorneys for Defendants 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 2:20-CV-01544-JCM-VCF JT. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & JT. STIP. TO STAY ALL PENDING DEADLINES AND HEARINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ATTESTATION 2 I, George Benjamin, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to 3 file this Joint Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulation to Stay All Pending Discovery Deadlines 4 and Hearings; [Proposed] Order. In compliance with LR IC 5-1(d), I hereby attest that Victoria L. 5 Neal concurs in this filing. 6 Dated: August 19, 2021 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 7 8 By: 9 /s/ George S. Benjamin George S. Benjamin Attorneys for Defendants 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case No. 2:20-CV-01544-JCM-VCF JT. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & JT. STIP. TO STAY ALL PENDING DEADLINES AND HEARINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ORDER 1 Based on the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 2 3 THAT: October 20, 2021 The Parties shall file a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice within 60 days. The 4 5 Court will schedule a video status conference for October 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM, to be vacated 6 upon the Parties filing a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice; and 7 The discovery deadlines set forth in the Court’s May 10, 2021 Court Order [ECF No. 79], 8 as well as the August 26, 2021 hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses To Plaintiff’s 9 First, Second and Third Sets of Interrogatories and First And Second Sets of Requests for 10 Production of Documents [ECF No. 82], and Motion for Leave To File Confidential Documents 11 Under Seal [ECF No. 83], are stayed pending the Court’s ruling on the Parties’ forthcoming Joint 12 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 The hearing scheduled for August 26, 2021, is VACATED. Dated: August 20, 2021 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Case No. 2:20-CV-01544-JCM-VCF JT. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & JT. STIP. TO STAY ALL PENDING DEADLINES AND HEARINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 The undersigned hereby certifies that on the date indicated below, a copy of the JOINT 3 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY ALL PENDING 4 DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND HEARINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER was served on the 5 following as indicated: 6 All Parties Registered Through the CM/ECF system. 7 Dated this 19th day of August 2021. 8 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 9 10 11 By: /s/ George S. Benjamin Jason S. Mills George S. Benjamin Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:20-CV-01544-JCM-VCF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.