Wilson v. United States of America et al, No. 2:2018cv01241 - Document 124 (D. Nev. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER Granting 122 Joint Pretrial Orderr Calendar Call set for 1/18/2023 at 01:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 1/23/2023 at 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/20/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wilson v. United States of America et al Doc. 124 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 1 of 65 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 10 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7434 ASH MARIE BLACKURN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14712 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148-5652 Tel: (702) 464-5000 Fax: (702) 463-4440 ash@mwinjury.com Counsel for Plaintiff SONALOLITA WILSON 11 12 13 14 CASE NO.: 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Plaintiff vs. [PROPOSED] JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 COMES NOW Plaintiff, SONALOLITA WILSON (“Plaintiff” or “Wilson”), by and through her attorneys, BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ., and ASH MARIE BLACKBURN, ESQ., of MAINOR WIRTH LLP; and Defendants UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC (“USA”), by and through their attorneys, SKYLER PEARSON, ESQ., and PATRICK ROSE, ESQ., of OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF NEVADA, Defendants LICETH DEMHASANTIAGO (‘SANTIAGO”) and JUAN DEMHA (“DEMHA”) by and through their attorneys, STEVEN T. JAFFE, ESQ. AND JAN K. TOMASIK, ESQ. of HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP; and submit the Joint Pretrial Order pursuant to LR 16-3. I. 25 26 27 28 A. Summary of Action This is a personal injury action arising out of two motor vehicle collisions that occurred on September 1, 2016, between Plaintiff WILSON and Defendant USA and Plaintiff WILSON and Page 1 of 39 Dockets.Justia.com MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 2 of 65 39 1 DEMHA-SANTIAGO and DEMHA. Plaintiff was traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue, 2 approaching Saylor Avenue, in the eastbound lanes. Plaintiff alleges Nakia McCloud, while in the 3 course and scope of her employment with Defendant USA, in its Department of the Treasury, IRS, 4 was also traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue, directly behind Plaintiff. 5 Plaintiff alleges to have stopped in the eastbound travel lane for pedestrians who were 6 crossing Washington Avenue. Plaintiff avers that Nakia McCloud then rear-ended Plaintiff’s 7 vehicle. 8 Following the first collision, Nakia McCloud pulled her vehicle off to the right side of the 9 road. Plaintiff’s vehicle remained in the roadway. As Nakia McCloud was on the phone with 10 emergency services, while Plaintiff sat in her disabled car, her vehicle was struck again by a 11 different vehicle, driven by Defendant DEMHA SANTIAGO. Plaintiff further contends she was 12 injured as a result of the September 1, 2016 motor vehicle collisions. 13 B. 14 Plaintiff seeks past medical specials in an amount in excess of $1,661,262.05. Plaintiff is 15 continuing her medical treatment. She is also seeking the present-day value of future medical 16 expenses in the amount of $386,938.00, loss of earning capacity in the amount of $805,038.85, and 17 past and future pain and suffering. Relief Sought 18 Plaintiff presented claims for future medical specials between $1,504,780.00 and 19 $2,238,876.00 during discovery. Thereafter, Defendant USA filed a Motion to Strike Untimely 20 Disclosure of Plaintiff’s Expert’s Life Care Plan Opinions, which was granted by the Court. 21 C. 22 1. Plaintiff’s Contentions: 23 Plaintiff contends that Defendants were the sole cause of the subject collisions by failing to 24 pay full attention to their surroundings, failing to reduce their speed, and striking the rear of 25 Plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff further contends that the motor vehicle collisions caused her significant 26 injuries and the resulting damages that are the subject of this lawsuit. 27 Contentions of the Parties 2. Defendant USA’s Contentions: 28 Page 2 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 3 of 65 39 1 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 2 Defendant, USA contends that Plaintiff cannot establish her burden of proof as to causation or damages (if any) as to the USA in the first accident 3 3. Defendants DEMHA-SANTIAGO and DEMHA’s Contentions: 4 Defendants LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO and JUAN DEMHA (“Defendants”) contend 5 that Defendant USA and Plaintiff are the sole and proximate cause of the subject incident and of 6 Plaintiff’s alleged injuries and damages, i.e., both collisions. Nakia McCloud, while in the course 7 and scope of her employment with Defendant USA (in its Department of the Treasury, IRS), was 8 driving directly behind Plaintiff prior to the initial collision. As a result of McCloud’s failure to pay 9 full attention to traffic in front of her, failure to keep a proper distance, and failure to reduce speed 10 pursuant to the traffic conditions ahead of her, McCloud drove her vehicle into the rear-end of 11 Plaintiff’s vehicle. Following the initial collision, rather than exiting the roadway to her safety, 12 Plaintiff exited her vehicle, inspected it for damage, then re-entered her vehicle which remained 13 disabled in the roadway. While she remained in her vehicle, Plaintiff also failed to fasten her 14 seatbelt. As a result, Plaintiff’s own negligent actions combined Defendant USA’s initial collision, 15 caused the second collision to take place. Defendants contend that Plaintiff’s claimed injures and 16 damages are the result of Defendant USA and Plaintiff’s negligence. Defendants further contend 17 that but for the collision caused by McCloud, these Defendants never would have been involved in 18 a collision with the Plaintiff. 19 II. 20 Statement of Jurisdiction 21 As against the United States, this Court has exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 22 §1346(b)(1), which provides that federal courts “shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions 23 on claims against the United States… for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death 24 caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while 25 acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, 26 if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where 27 the act or omission occurred.” 28 Page 3 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 4 of 65 39 1 III. 2 The following facts are admitted by the parties and require no proof: 3 1. 4 September 1, 2016 and she was acting within the course and scope of her employment 5 with the United States at the time of the motor vehicle accident. 6 2. On September 1, 2016, Plaintiff WILSON was operating a 2005 Toyota Corolla, 7 traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue, approaching Saylor Avenue, in Las Vegas, 8 Nevada. 9 3. On September 1, 2016,. Nakia McCloud was operating a General Motors Terrain SLE, MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 10 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 Nakia McCloud was an employee of the Department of the Treasury, IRS, on 11 traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue. 4. On September 1, 2016, Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO, was operating a 2006 Acura 12 13 3.2 TL, traveling eastbound on Washington Avenue. 5. The vehicle operated by Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO was owned by Defendant 14 15 DEMHA. 6. The front of Nakia McCloud’s vehicle collided with the rear of Plaintiff WILSON’s 16 17 vehicle. 7. The front of Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO’s vehicle collided with the rear of Plaintiff WILSON’s vehicle. 18 19 8. The collision between DEMHA-SANTIAGO and Plaintiff did not occur until after McCloud’s vehicle collided with the Plaintiff’s vehicle. 20 21 22 IV. The following facts, though not admitted, will not be contested at trial by evidence to 23 the contrary: 24 None. 25 V. 26 The following are Plaintiff’s issues of fact to be tried and determined at trial: 27 1. Whether Nakia McCloud was negligent in her failure to operate her vehicle in a safe 28 Page 4 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 5 of 65 39 1 2 and reasonable manner at the time of the incident. 2. 3 4 breach of duty. 3. 5 6 4. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 Whether Defendant JUAN DEMHA is liable for the subject collision by virtue of NRS 41.440. 5. 9 10 Whether Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO failed to operate her vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner at the time of the incident. 7 8 Whether Defendant USA is liable for Plaintiff’s injuries in light of Nakia McCloud’s Whether Defendant JUAN DEMHA negligently entrusted his vehicle to Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO. 6. Whether Plaintiff could have reasonably been expected to avoid the second collision pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF 113). 11 12 7. Whether the subject collisions proximately caused injuries to Plaintiff. 13 8. Whether the subject collisions proximately caused damages to Plaintiff. 14 9. Whether the medical treatment claimed was/is reasonable, necessary, and related to 15 the alleged collisions. 16 10. Whether the Plaintiff will have future symptoms related to the alleged collisions. 17 11. Whether the Plaintiff will incur future treatments related to the alleged collisions. 18 12. Whether the Plaintiff suffered a loss of earning capacity related to the alleged 19 20 collisions. 13. 21 22 23 24 Whether the Plaintiff has mitigated her damages that she relates to the alleged collisions. 14. The monetary value of Plaintiff's damages, including pain and suffering, if any. The following are Defendant USA’s issues of fact to be tried and determined at trial. 1. Whether Plaintiff should have stopped at the intersection given that the 25 pedestrians never entered the intersection and, even if they did, the pedestrians 26 were not in immediate harm or danger given that they were on the other side of the 27 street and nowhere near Plaintiff’s vehicle. 28 Page 5 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 6 of 65 39 1 2. 2 injuries due to the second accident. 3 3. Whether the United States is liable to Plaintiff and if so, to what extent. 4 4. Whether the United States’ employee’s actions caused Plaintiff’s injuries (if any). 5 5. Whether and the extent to which Plaintiff was injured as a result of the first accident involving the United States’ employee. 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 10 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 Whether Plaintiff’s exit and later re-entry of her own vehicle caused her to sustain 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 6. Whether Plaintiff or any other party’s negligence contributed to the accidents and/or Plaintiff’s injuries. The following are Defendants DEMHA-SANTIAGO, and DEMHA’s issues of fact to be tried and determined at trial. 1. Whether Nakia McCloud was negligent in her failure to operate her vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner at the time of the incident. 2. Whether Defendant USA is liable for Plaintiff’s injuries in light of Nakia McCloud’s breach of duty. 3. Whether Plaintiff failed to operate her vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner at the time of the subject incident, at times preceding both collisions. 4. Whether Plaintiff contributed to the initial collisions occurrence, i.e. Plaintiff’s degree of fault for the collision between herself and McCloud. 5. Whether, after the first collision, Plaintiff contributed to the second collision’s occurrence, i.e. Plaintiff’s degree of fault for the second collision between herself and Demha. 6. Whether the collision between Plaintiff and DEMHA-SANTIAGO would have occurred but for the collision between Plaintiff and McCloud. 7. Whether Defendant JUAN DEMHA is liable for the subject collision by virtue of NRS 41.440. 8. Whether Defendant JUAN DEMHA negligently entrusted his vehicle to Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO. 9. Whether Plaintiff could have reasonably been expected to avoid the second collision 28 Page 6 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 7 of 65 39 1 2 10. Whether Plaintiff assumed the risk of reentering her vehicle following the initial collision 3 11. Whether the subject collisions proximately caused injuries to Plaintiff. 4 12. Whether the subject collisions proximately caused damages to Plaintiff. 5 13. Whether Plaintiff had preexisting conditions related to the body parts complained of 6 7 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 8 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF 113). resulting from the subject accident, and any apportionment thereof. 14. Whether the medical treatment claimed was/is reasonable, necessary, and related to the alleged collisions. 9 15. Whether the Plaintiff will have future symptoms related to the alleged collisions. 10 16. Whether the Plaintiff will incur future treatments related to the alleged collisions. 11 17. Whether the Plaintiff suffered a loss of earning capacity related to the alleged collisions. 12 18. Whether the Plaintiff has mitigated her damages that she relates to the alleged collisions. 13 19. The monetary value of Plaintiff's damages, including pain and suffering, if any. 14 15 16 VI. (a) The following exhibits are stipulated into evidence in this case and may be so marked by the clerk: 17 See “Exhibit A-1” of this document.. 18 (b) The parties agree the following exhibits will be available for use at the time of trial but 19 are not currently admitted: 20 See “Exhibit A” of this document 21 (c) 22 23 As to the following additional exhibits the parties propose the following: (1) Plaintiff’s exhibits: See “Exhibit B” of this document. 24 Plaintiff reserves the right to use any documents disclosed by Defendants, including those 25 which experts have reviewed and formed opinions, such as reports; pleadings; correspondence; 26 notes and medical records and billing. 27 Plaintiff may use any and all writings, published works, journals, treatises, medical texts, 28 Page 7 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 8 of 65 39 1 affidavits, films, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, reports, computer tapes, computer discs, 2 and other data compilations, and other medical reference materials which Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s 3 expert(s) use in support of Plaintiff’s allegations. By disclosing documents, Plaintiff does not waive 4 the right to challenge and exclude documents, or portions thereof, on any basis. 5 Plaintiff may offer documents needed for rebuttal or impeachment purposes, including, but 6 not limited to, discovery obtained during the course of litigation as permitted; pleadings; and other 7 documentation in accordance with admissible evidence. There may be additional exhibits which 8 Plaintiff may wish to offer at the time of trial, not listed above. When and if that determination is 9 made, notice will be given immediately and supplied to the Court and to Defendants. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 (1) Defendant USA’s exhibits: See “Exhibit C” of this document. 11 12 Defendant reserves the right to use any document including but not limited to discovery 13 responses and/or deposition testimony by Plaintiff or co-defendants for impeachment and/or 14 substantively as party admissions, as may be relevant at trial. Defendant reserves the right to use 15 demonstrative evidence. Defendant also reserves the right to use any exhibit listed or introduced by 16 Plaintiff or co-defendants, or as previously produced by the parties. 17 (1) Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO, and DEMHA’s exhibits: See “Exhibit D” of this document. 18 19 Defendants reserve the right to use any discovery responses and/or deposition testimony by 20 any party for impeachment and/or substantively as party admissions, as may be relevant at trial. 21 Defendants reserve the right to use demonstrative evidence. Defendants also reserve the right to use 22 any exhibit listed or introduced by any party. 23 As to the medical records listed separately in the parties’ list of exhibits, the parties were 24 unable to meet in person to review the same in light of the volume of records, Plaintiff’s continued 25 treatment, and the time permitted to submit the Proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order. However, the parties 26 will endeavor to do so prior to trial and identify which portions of said records may be stipulated to 27 and which may not. 28 Page 8 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 9 of 65 39 1 (c) Electronic evidence: 2 1. 3 boards depicting the facts and circumstance of the accident, information relevant to 4 communications between the parties, and/or deposition testimony. 5 6 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 2. The parties do intend to present electronic evidence for purposes of jury deliberations. 7 (d) Depositions: 8 1. Plaintiff will offer the following deposition testimony at trial: 9 Deponent Liceth Demha 10 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 The parties may offer Power Point images/drawings/diagrams/animations/story 11 Nakia McCloud 12 13 Sonalolita Wilson 14 15 16 Baduk Ghuman 17 18 19 Duff Kaster 20 Robert Hinton 21 Mark Glyman 22 Thomas Dunn 23 24 Rick Chavez 25 26 27 28 Kim Balogh Offered Testimony 10:24-11:20, 21:1-19, 22:18-23:4, 27:22-28:8, 28:24-31:16, 35:2049:24, 52:16-53:15, 57:14-62:4 12:21-13:14, 27:4-28:16, 32:8-34:11, 34:25-35:23, 39:8-47:20, 48:2254:22, 57:15-62:22, 65:3-72:6, 73:14-75:25, 76:24-78:15, 83:17-85:6, 92:13-93:19, 96:9-96:14 13:2-13:22, 15:3-15:10, 15:15-16:15, 17:4-17:12, 19:8-19:14, 19:2022:23, 23:9-26:10, 27:7-29:18, 34:14-35:9, 35:25-38:10, 38:24-40:25, 42:5-54:1, 54:9-60:2, 65:5-66:18,67:17-69:17, 71:6-75:23, 80:1582:16, 86:8-88:3, 88:17-89:15, 89:25-90:13, 93:8-96:10, 97:10-101:20, 102:14-103:1, 105:18-106:18, 107:11-109:10, 109:25-111:12, 111:19112:6, 112:19-119:4, 123:12-125:5, 125:20-135:15, 136:5-138:13 18:14 – 20:6, 21:9 – 22:22, 27:16 – 28:25, 30:8 – 33:11, 35:1-41:9, 44:9– 49:5, 49:6-50:8, 50:14-55:3, 55:5-56:1, 56:25-58:7, 59:2-60:23, 60:24-64:15, 64:16-67:9, 68:6-71:9, 75:11-76:25, 82:7-84:5, 84:1188:18, 89:3-91:16, 94:19-96:12, 100:6-103:25, 108:7-110:22, 111:16112:25, 113:21-115:25 15:3-15:22, 21:12-23:11, 24:9-25:1, 25:16-26:13, 26:24-27:12, 28:429:24, 32:21-33:23, 34:6-34:16, 35:1-35:18 10:4 – 11:15, 12:17 – 13:1, 14:7-15:4, 15:9-16:16, 16:20-17:12, 21:1023:19, 24:12-25:12, 26:1-30:14, 31:1-32:2, 33:9-40:23 11:25-12:21, 14:10-15:1, 19:1-22:4, 22:18-23:16, 24:4-31:16, 33:333:20, 34:13-37:13,37:20-41:16, 41:22-43:9, 44:1-44:23 7:12-9:12, 19:13-20:16, 23:5-24:2, 25:4-25:22, 26:18-31:19, 33:2035:10, 35:17-39:10, 39:21-44:20, 48:25-50:11, 52:20-55:5, 56:7-57:7, 57:20-60:2, 60:23-61:6, 61:21-62:20, 63:19-66:3, 66:14-67:19 10:16-11:6, 20:6-20:18, 22:21-24:22, 25:3-25:14, 29:16-31:21, 41:342:19,45:9-46:1, 47:23-50:5, 51:1-53:9, 59:13-60:21, 63:14-63:25, 64:24-70:10, 71:10-72:24, 73:9-74:14, 75:25-76:17, 77:17-78:12, 79:181:14, 82:8-83:2,84:13-86:9, 87:6-87:24, 94:19-96:9, 102:21-103:19, 106:7-107:10,108:17-109:18, 110:1-112:2, 114:9-118:17 12:24-14:4, 18:3-19:2, 19:11-20:24, 22:4-25:20, 26:22-29:15, 30:933:5, 33:14-33:23 Page 9 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 10 of 65 39 1 11 11:24-14:2, 14:14-15:15, 16:25-17:16, 20:1-20:16, 24:4-24:25, 26:226:24, 28:3-28:10, 30:3-30:17, 31:14-32:4, 32:17-36:1, 36:7-37:14, 37:22-42:1, 42:15-43:15, 44:2-45:7, 49:7-50:7, 51:8-51:16, 52:19-53:5, 53:18-54:14, 55:19-57:12, 57:21-58:20, 61:3-62:3, 64:14-64:22, 65:1166:21, 71:8-73:5, 77:6-77:13, 77:19-78:5 Robert Simmons 13:3-13:15, 14:24-15:4, 19:21-20:14, 23:3-25:10, 28:3-29:11, 30:631:9, 34:25-37:8, 38:24-39:22, 41:10-42:14 Jaswinder Grover 11:23-13:13, 17:6-17:22, 20:5-21:8, 21:21-22:13, 23:1-24:11, 25:227:18, 29:18-31:3, 32:3-33:1, 35:18-38:21, 39:2-41:20, 43:2-43:6, 44:16-48:25, 49:1-49:25, 50:8-52:5, 53:3-55:14, 59:5-61:4, 62:10-64:7, 66:2-68:17, 70:4-74:6, 74:23-76:9, 77:7-78:15, 80:3-81:25, 84:11-85:3, 89:4-93:12, 94:6-94:13, 94:14-96:18, 96:21-97:14, 98:3-102:14, 104:7105:16, 106:6-111:21 Sonalolita Wilson pt. 157:1-164:11, 170:8-180:1, 182:14-183:8, 184:2-185:5, 185:6-186:17, II 187:18-191:4, 191:15-192:8, 196:23-198:7,201:8-202:7, 205:1-207:17, 209:24-217:17, 218:22-220:11, 222:1-223:20, 225:3-227:8, 233:14236:15, 237:14-239:14, 241:7-245:4, 248:3-249:4 Plaintiff anticipates reading depositions into the records and reserve the right to use all 12 depositions which have been conducted in this action due to witness unavailability, if allowed under 13 FRCP 32(a)(4)(B), to refresh recollection and/or to impeach a witness, as well as any other 14 permitted use under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Evidence. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 15 David John Oliveri 2. Defendant USA does not intend, at this time to offer page and line designations for 16 any deposition transcripts. In the event Defendant USA learns that a witness is unavailable to testify 17 at trial, Defendant USA will notify all parties and the Court of page and line designations of the 18 unavailable witness’s deposition transcript to offer at trial. Defendant USA reserves the right to use 19 all depositions which have been conducted in this action to refresh recollection and/or to impeach 20 a witness, and otherwise use at trial in accordance with the applicable rules, i.e., Fed. R. Civ. P. 32; 21 Fed. R. Evid. 801(d). 22 23 24 3. Defendants DEMHA-SANTIAGO, and DEMHA will offer the following depositions: Deponent Liceth Demha 25 26 27 Nakia McCloud Offered Testimony 10:5-11:20, 15:7-8, 17:7-21, 20:9-13, 20:20-25, 23:15-16, 24:11-16, 27:22-28:8, 28:24-31:7, 35:20-36:12, 40:14-16, 47:14-19, 52:16-53:15, 54:20-25, 57:14-23, 58:14-20, 59:23-60:5, 61:16-20 12:21-13:14, 24:14-25:1, 27:4-28:16, 30:20-31:5, 32:8-34:11, 34:2535:23, 36:5-7, 39:8-47:20, 48:22-54:22, 55:4-56:13, 57:15-62:22, 65:372:6, 73:14-75:25, 76:24-78:15, 80:5-18, 81:10-25, 83:17-85:6, 87:9- 28 Page 10 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 11 of 65 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 24, 89:15-25, 93:4-17, 96:9-96:14 8:2-14, 11:8-22, 13:2-13:14, 15:3-16:15, 18:5-19:7, 19:20-21:11, 21:18-22:13, 24:1-12, 27:7-29:18, 35:25-38:10, 38:24-54:1, 59:14-24, 60:10-61:5, 65:5-66:20, 66:19-25, 67:10-12, 89:21-90:9, 90:20-91:8, 97:2-109:10, 112:24-113:4, 113:5-113:13,119:8-119:13, 128:15-17, 131:3-14, 136:14-137:2, 137:17-25, Babuk Ghuman 9:8-17, 9:18-11:7, 11:13-24, 15:14-25, 16:1-7, 17:19-18:2, 21:9-22:24, 24:13-23, 27:16 – 28:25, 30:8 – 33:11, 34:3-19, 35:1-41:9, 47:2-24, 48:7-18, 49:6-50:8, 50:14-55:3, 60:1-23, 62:2-25, 63:8-14, 67:6-9, 68:19-69:2, 80:5-12, 87:15-19, 91:14-23, 94:5-11, 100:9-18,112:11-25, 113:8-13 Duff Kaster 6:8-7:10, 7:11-22, 10:23-11:25, 15:23-16:10, 18:12-19:1, 21:12-15, 24:9-18, 28:4-7, 32:1-7 Robert Hinton 7:2-13, 9:6-16, 10:4 – 11:23, 12:17 – 13:1, 13:14-17:12, 18:21-19:22, 21:10-24, 23:1-9, 26:1-7, 28:17-29:21, 31:1-9, Mark Glyman 6:3-7:25, 8:13-15, 10:1-11:24, 13:7-10, 14:10-19, 16:11-17:9, 19:420:25, 21:8-22:4, 24:4-9, 30:1-31:16, 37:20-25 Thomas Dunn 6:12-7:23, 9:14-22, 10:8-23, 12:2-7, 18:3-19:5, 19:13-20:16, 23:5-24:2, 37:10-17, 42:8-43:24, 45:17-47:5, 50:3-11, 60:3-21, 60:23-61:6, Rick Chavez 5:7-16, 21:1-3, 26:4-6, 28:3-10, 40:15-41:5, 44:3-45:8, 56:3-6, 59:6-7, 61:10-62:6, 62:18-63:1, 64:5-20, 65:8-15, 67:4-68:25, 69:1-5, 71:10-21, 72:2-14, 73:17-23, 74:15-22, 77:5-12, 84:13-21, 85:1-17, 86:1-9, 88:16-17, 90:5-9, 96:4, 105:4-5, 111:3-19, 114:16115:22, 119:22-120:1, 120:20-121:2 Kim Balogh 7:19-18:2, 12:4-13:8, 18:22-19:2, 24:9-25:9, 25:21-26:21, 28:7-13, 28:22-29:2, 30:24-31:19, 32:14-33:23 David John Olivieri 7:25-9:25, 10:14-21, 11:12-24, 12:1-13:12, 14:9-15:6, 15:7-18, 15:23 16:3, 16:4-24, 17:17-21, 18:4-19:3, 20:1-21, 21:2-22:16, 23:18-24:25, 25:4-26:24, 27:3-28:10, 29:24-30:14, 31:3-32:14, 32:22-33:20, 34:436:1, 36:7-37:14, 39:1-21, 39:23-42:1, 42:15-43:2, 44:1-5, 44:7-45:7, 45:19-46:5, 47:3-23, 51:1-16, 55:19-56:8, 57:21-58:4, 58:10-20, 58:21 59:22, 60:1-9, 60:14-61:22, 64:4-22, 65:25-66:16, 66:17-67:2, 67:3 68:13, 68:14-22, 68:23-69:1, 69:18-70:13, 71:11-14, 77:22-79:23 Robert Simmons 7:15-19, 8:6-8, 11:7-13, 13:10-15, 14:9-13, 14:25-15:2, 16:6-17:1, 17:9-16, 18:12-19:11, 20:4-20:22, 21:3-6, 24:1-25:2, 26:10 27:8, 28:3-23, 29:20-30:18, 31:5-25, 32:4-17, 34:25-36:7, 36:8-25, 37:1-8, 38:24-39:17, 41:10-25 Jaswinder Grover 8:19-21, 12:15-13:13, 20:5-8, 21:18-20, 23:1-24:11, 26:22-27:18, 29:18-30:13, 33:2-3, 35:18-11, 36:22-37:1, 38:7-21, 39:241:20, 44:3-5, 45:10-19, 46:13-47:24, 48:12-25, 50:8-19, 56:2-7, 56:16-22, 58:7-25, 63:13-23, 64:17-66:1, 67:3-68:6, 69:1-24, 71:1172:23, 74:20-76:9, 80:8-19, 84:2-16, 88:2-19, 89:2-17, 90:16-91:22, 94:14-95:18, 96:2-18, 97:2-22, 98:3-99:8, 99:9-100:18, 102:16-103:20, 103:21-104:3, 104:10-105:9, 105:10-12, 106:4-107:9, 107:11-108:1, 108:2-9, Sonalolita Wilson pt. 148:16-25, 150:22-151:16, 152:1-7, 155:6-25, 157:1-164:11, 164:21Sonalolita Wilson Page 11 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 12 of 65 39 1 II 2 3 Frank Perez 4 170:13, 172:22-25, 174:1-8, 174:17-23, 175:13-25, 176:16-177:7, 177:11-21, 180:19-22, 182:14-183:8, 185:6-186:12, 189:7-190:19, 192:2-8, 192:25-193:6, 201:9-15, 205:1-22, 213:7-14, 213:18-22, 214:9-14, 217:5-25, 225:3-12, 238:19-239:11, 243:5-244:6, 248:11-24 Plaintiff is in the process of obtaining his deposition transcript and will supplement at a later date. 5 6 7 8 9 Defendants anticipate reading depositions into the records and reserve the right to use all depositions which have been conducted in this action due to witness unavailability, if allowed under FRCP 32(a)(4)(B), to refresh recollection and/or to impeach a witness, as well as any other permitted use under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Evidence. (f) Objections to Depositions: MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (1) Plaintiff objects to Defendant USA’s depositions as follows: Plaintiff reserves the right to object to any particular portions of the deposition transcript(s), including, without limitation, if and/or when Defendant USA provides them. (2) Plaintiff objects to Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO, and DEMHA’s depositions as follows: Deponent Liceth Demha Offered Testimony 10:5-11:20, 15:7-8, 17:7-21, 20:9-13, 20:20-25, 23:15-16, 24:11-16, 27:2228:8, 28:24-31:7, 35:20-36:12, 40:14-16, 47:14-19, 52:16-53:15, 54:20-25, 57:1423, 58:14-20, 59:23-60:5, 61:16-20 Nakia McCloud 12:21-13:14, 24:14-25:1, 27:4-28:16, 30:20-31:5, 32:8-34:11, 34:25-35:23, 36:5-7, 39:8-47:20, 48:22-54:22, 55:456:13, 57:15-62:22, 65:3-72:6, 73:1475:25, 76:24-78:15, 80:5-18, 81:10-25, 83:17-85:6, 87:9-24, 89:15-25, 93:4-17, 96:9-96:14 Sonalolita 8:2-14, 11:8-22, 13:2-13:14, 15:3-16:15, Wilson 18:5-19:7, 19:20-21:11, 21:18-22:13, 24:1-12, 27:7-29:18, 35:25-38:10, 38:2454:1, 59:14-24, 60:10-61:5, 65:5-66:20, 66:19-25, 67:10-12, 89:21-90:9, 90:2091:8, 97:2-109:10, 112:24-113:4, 113:5113:13,119:8-119:13, 128:15-17, 131:314, 136:14-137:2, 137:17-25, Babuk Ghuman 9:8-17, 9:18-11:7, 11:13-24, 15:14-25, 16:1-7, 17:19-18:2, 21:9-22:24, 24:13- 28 Page 12 of 39 Plaintiff’s Objections 17:7 – 21 – Relevance 20:20 – 25 – Relevance 54:20 – 25 – Relevance 24:14 – 18 – Relevance 30:20 – 31:5 – Speculation 34:25 – 35:23 – Relevance 27:7 – 28:23 – Relevance; more prejudicial than probative 60:10 – 61:5 – Relevance; attorney client privilege; more prejudicial than probative 11:13 – 24 – Relevance Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 13 of 65 39 23, 27:16 – 28:25, 30:8 – 33:11, 34:3-19, 35:1-41:9, 47:2-24, 48:7-18, 49:6-50:8, 50:14-55:3, 60:1-23, 62:2-25, 63:8-14, 67:6-9, 68:19-69:2, 80:5-12, 87:15-19, 91:14-23, 94:5-11, 100:9-18,112:11-25, 113:8-13 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 Duff Kaster 12 13 6:8-7:10, 7:11-22, 10:23-11:25, 15:2316:10, 18:12-19:1, 21:12-15, 24:9-18, 28:4-7, 32:1-7 15 Robert Hinton 17 Mark Glyman 19 7:2-13, 9:6-16, 10:4 – 11:23, 12:17 – 13:1, 13:14-17:12, 18:21-19:22, 21:1024, 23:1-9, 26:1-7, 28:17-29:21, 31:1-9, 6:3-7:25, 8:13-15, 10:1-11:24, 13:7-10, 13:7 – 10 – Relevance 14:10-19, 16:11-17:9, 19:4-20:25, 21:822:4, 24:4-9, 30:1-31:16, 37:20-25 14:10 – 19 – Relevance 20 Plaintiff objects to any hypothetical questions not based in evidence as to the causation of Plaintiff’s injuries. 21 22 23 24 25 32:1 – 7 – Misrepresents the witness’ testimony; vague Plaintiff objects to any hypothetical questions not based in evidence as to the causation of Plaintiff’s injuries. 14 18 62:2 – 63:14 – Speculation; Relevance; Assumes facts not in evidence Plaintiff objects to any hypothetical questions not based in evidence as to the causation of Plaintiff’s injuries. 9 16 48:7 – 18 – Relevance; more prejudicial than probative 112:11 – 25 – Misrepresents facts in evidence; speculation 7 11 47:2 – 24 – Misrepresents facts in evidence; speculation Thomas Dunn 6:12-7:23, 9:14-22, 10:8-23, 12:2-7, 18:3-19:5, 19:13-20:16, 23:5-24:2, 37:10-17, 42:8-43:24, 45:17-47:5, 50:311, 60:3-21, 60:23-61:6, 18:3 – 19:5 – Relevance 42:8 – 43:24 – Speculation; improper hypothetical 60:3 – 21 – Relevance 26 Plaintiff objects to any hypothetical questions not based 27 28 Page 13 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 14 of 65 39 1 in evidence as to the causation of Plaintiff’s injuries. 2 3 Rick Chavez 4 5 6 7 8 Kim Balogh 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 David John Oliveri 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 5:7-16, 21:1-3, 26:4-6, 28:3-10, 40:1541:5, 44:3-45:8, 56:3-6, 59:6-7, 61:10-62:6, 62:18-63:1, 64:5-20, 65:8-15, 67:4-68:25, 69:1-5, 71:10-21, 72:2-14, 73:17-23, 74:15-22, 77:5-12, 84:13-21, 85:1-17, 86:1-9, 88:16-17, 90:5-9, 96:4, 105:4-5, 111:3-19, 114:16-115:22, 119:22-120:1, 120:20-121:2 7:19-18:2, 12:4-13:8, 18:22-19:2, 24:925:9, 25:21-26:21, 28:7-13, 28:22-29:2, 30:24-31:19, 32:14-33:23 7:25-9:25, 10:14-21, 11:12-24, 12:113:12, 14:9-15:6, 15:7-18, 15:23 16:3, 16:4-24, 17:17-21, 18:4-19:3, 20:1-21, 21:2-22:16, 23:18-24:25, 25:4-26:24, 27:3-28:10, 29:24-30:14, 31:3-32:14, 32:22-33:20, 34:4-36:1, 36:7-37:14, 39:1-21, 39:23-42:1, 42:15-43:2, 44:1-5, 44:7-45:7, 45:19-46:5, 47:3-23, 51:1-16, 55:19-56:8, 57:21-58:4, 58:10-20, 58:21 59:22, 60:1-9, 60:14-61:22, 64:4-22, 65:25-66:16, 66:17-67:2, 67:3 68:13, 68:14-22, 68:23-69:1, 69:18-70:13, 71:11-14, 77:22-79:23 18 19 20 Robert Simmons 21 22 7:15-19, 8:6-8, 11:7-13, 13:10-15, 14:913, 14:25-15:2, 16:6-17:1, 17:9-16, 18:12-19:11, 20:4-20:22, 21:3-6, 24:125:2, 26:10 27:8, 28:3-23, 29:20-30:18, 31:5-25, 32:4-17, 34:25-36:7, 36:8-25, 37:1-8, 38:24-39:17, 41:10-25 23 26 27 28 67:3 – 68:13 – Relevance; violation of the collateral source rule 77:22 – 79:23 – Speculation Plaintiff objects to any hypothetical questions not based in evidence as to the causation of Plaintiff’s injuries. 24:1 – 25:2 – Speculation 29:20 – 32:17 – Speculation; misstates facts in evidence; improper hypothetical 36:8 – 25 – Speculation 41:10 – 25 – Relevance 24 25 10:14 – 21 – Relevance 18:4 – 19:3 – Relevance 27:3 – 28:10 – Speculation 42:15 – 43:2 – Speculation Jaswinder Grover 8:19-21, 12:15-13:13, 20:5-8, 21:18-20, 63:13-23 and 64:17 – 66:1 – 23:1-24:11, Relevance; speculation 26:22-27:18, 29:18-30:13, 33:2-3, 35:1811, 36:22-37:1, 38:7-21, 39:2-41:20, 44:3-5, 45:10-19, 46:13-47:24, 48:12-25, 50:8-19, 56:2-7, 56:16-22, 58:7-25, Page 14 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 15 of 65 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 Sonalolita Wilson pt. II 63:13-23, 64:17-66:1, 67:3-68:6, 69:124, 71:11-72:23, 74:20-76:9, 80:8-19, 84:2-16, 88:2-19, 89:2-17, 90:16-91:22, 94:14-95:18, 96:2-18, 97:2-22, 98:399:8, 99:9-100:18, 102:16-103:20, 103:21-104:3, 104:10-105:9, 105:10-12, 106:4-107:9, 107:11-108:1, 108:2-9, 148:16-25, 150:22-151:16, 152:1-7, 155:6-25, 157:1-164:11, 164:21-170:13, 172:22-25, 174:1-8, 174:17-23, 175:1325, 176:16-177:7, 177:11-21, 180:19-22, 182:14-183:8, 185:6-186:12, 189:7190:19, 192:2-8, 192:25-193:6, 201:915, 205:1-22, 213:7-14, 213:18-22, 214:9-14, 217:5-25, 225:3-12, 238:19239:11, 243:5-244:6, 248:11-24 157:1 – 164:11 – Relevance 164:21 – 170:13 – Relevance 185:6 – 186:12 – Relevance 189:7 – 190:19 – Relevance 192:25 – 193:6 – Relevance; hearsay 201:21 – 24 -- Relevance 205:1 – 22 – Relevance 11 12 (3) Defendant USA objects to plaintiff’s depositions as follows: 13 a. Plaintiff WILSON’s depositions: All testimony. 14 b. David John Oliveri’s deposition: All testimony; including, without limitation, to any 15 testimony related to David John Oliveri’s life care plan and future medical treatments as struck by 16 the Court. See ECF No. 90. 17 c. To the extent Plaintiff intends to call Defendant USA’s expert witnesses and present their 18 deposition testimony in her case-in-chief, Defendant USA objects to: All Plaintiff’s proposed 19 testimony of Defendant USA’s expert witnesses; including, without limitation, to Rick Chavez and 20 Kimberly Balough’s testimony. 21 Defendant, USA reserves the right to object to any particular portions of the other deposition 22 transcripts, including, without limitation, those provided by Plaintiff and Defendants DEHMA- 23 SANTIAGO and DEMHA’s inclusions in this order. Furthermore, USA joins as to co-defendant 24 DEMHA-SANTIAGO’s objections to Plaintiff’s depositions as noted in subsection (4) below. USA 25 further objects to the extent that either Plaintiff or co-defendants seek to introduce or use any 26 deposition transcript at trial beyond that allowed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or the 27 Federal Rules of Evidence. 28 Page 15 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 16 of 65 39 1 (4) The United States objects to Defendants DEMHA-SANTIAGO and DEMHA’s deposition page, 2 line designations as follows: 3 4 Deponent Liceth Demha Offered Testimony 10:5-11:20 (relevance; prejudicial; calls for speculation; incomplete hypothetical; expert opinion) 20:20-25 (relevance; prejudicial; character evidence) Nakia McCloud 12:21-13:14 (relevance; prejudicial; calls for speculation; incomplete hypothetical; expert opinion) 27:4-28:16 (relevance) 30:20-31:5 (relevance) 34:25-35:23 (relevance; prejudicial; character evidence) 36:5-7 (relevance, confusion of issues) 39:8-47:20 (relevance; legal conclusion) 55:4-56:13 (relevance; prejudice; hearsay; best evidence rule) 57:15-62:22 (relevance; prejudice; hearsay; best evidence rule) 76:24-78:15 (relevance; hearsay; best evidence rule) 80:5-18 (relevance; prejudice; legal conclusion; best evidence rule) 81:10-25 (relevance; prejudice; legal conclusion; calls for speculation) 83:17-85:6 (relevance; prejudice; hypothetical to lay witness; legal conclusion; calls for speculation) 89:15-25 (relevance; prejudice; testimony by counsel) 24:1-12 (legal conclusion, expert opinion) 119:8-119:13 (hearsay) 9:18-11:7 (relevance) 15:14-25 (relevance) 62:2-25 (relevance; best evidence rule) 67:6-9 (relevance; best evidence rule) 87:15-19 (relevance) 113:8-13 (relevance) 6:8-7:10 (relevance) 10:23-11:25 (relevance) 13:14-17:12 (object to 16:9-16 on grounds of relevance, prejudice, self-serving hearsay, legal conclusion) 6:3-7:25 (relevance) 10:1-11:24 (relevance; best evidence rule); 13:7-10 (relevance; prejudicial) 24:4-9 (relevance; foundation) 60:3-21 (relevance; hearsay; counsel testifying) 5:7-16 (relevance; foundation; best evidence rule) 28:3-10 (relevance) 40:15-41:5 (relevance) 44:3-45:8 (relevance; best evidence rule) 56:3-6 (relevance) 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Sonalolita Wilson Babuk Ghuman 17 18 19 20 Duff Kaster 21 Robert Hinton 22 Mark Glyman 23 24 25 26 27 Thomas Dunn Rick Chavez 28 Page 16 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 17 of 65 39 1 2 3 Kim Balogh David John Olivieri 4 5 6 Robert Simmons 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 Jaswinder Grover Sonalolita Wilson pt. II (5) Defendant DEMHA-SANTIAGO, and DEMHA object to plaintiff’s depositions as follows: Deponent Liceth Demha 14 15 16 17 Nakia McCloud 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 59:6-7 (incomplete hypothetical; relevance) 64:5-20 (testimony by counsel) 30:24-31:19 (relevance; incomplete hypothetical; foundation) 32:14-33:23 (incomplete/improper hypothetical; foundation) 11:12-24 (relevance) 15:23 16:3 (relevance; foundation; 702) 34:4-36:1 (relevance; speculation) 69:18-70:13 (relevance; foundation; 702) 77:22-79:23 (relevance; foundation; 702) 7:15-19 (relevance) 11:7-13 (relevance) 17:9-16 (relevance) 24:1-25:2 (hearsay) 21:18-20 (relevance) 44:3-5 (relevance; foundation) 243:5-244:6 (hearsay; legal conclusion) Sonalolita Wilson Offered Testimony 10:24-11:20, (calls for speculation; incomplete hypothetical; expert opinion) 21:1-19, (relevance; prejudicial) 22:18-23:4, (relevance) 27:22-28:8, (relevance) 28:24-31:16, (relevance; assumption) 35:20-49:24, (relevance; expert opinion) 57:14-62:4 (relevance; expert opinion) 39:8-47:20, (expert opinion) 83:17-85:6, (incomplete hypothetical; calls for speculation; expert opinion) 92:13-93:19, (calls for legal conclusion; expert opinion) 13:2-13:22, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion) 19:8-19:14, (relevance) 23:9-26:10, (expert opinion) 38:24-40:25, (expert opinion) 42:5-54:1, (relevance, expert opinion) 54:9-60:2, (relevance, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 71:6-75:23, (expert opinion, best evidence rule) 80:15-82:16, (relevance, prejudicial) 86:8-88:3, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 88:17-89:15, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 89:25-90:13, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 93:8-96:10, (relevance, expert opinion, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 102:14-103:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 105:18-106:18, (relevance, prejudicial) 107:11-109:10, (relevance, prejudicial) 109:25-111:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 28 Page 17 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 18 of 65 39 1 2 3 Baduk Ghuman 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 Duff Kaster 16 17 18 19 20 Robert Hinton 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mark Glyman 112:19-119:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 125:20-135:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 136:5-138:13 (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 18:14 – 20:6, (relevance, prejudicial) 21:9 – 22:22, (relevance, prejudicial) 27:16 – 28:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 35:1-41:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 44:9– 49:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 50:14-55:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 55:5-56:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 56:25-58:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 59:2-60:23, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 60:24-64:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 64:16-67:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 68:6-71:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 75:11-76:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 82:7-84:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 84:11-88:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 89:3-91:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:19-96:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 100:6-103:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 108:7-110:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 111:16-112:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 113:21-115:25 (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 15:3-15:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 21:12-23:11, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:9-25:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 25:16-26:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 26:24-27:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 28:4-29:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 32:21-33:23, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 34:6-34:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 35:1-35:18(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 21:10-23:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:12-25:12, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 26:1-30:14, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 31:1-32:2, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 33:9-40:23(relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 11:25-12:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 14:10-15:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 19:1-22:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 22:18-23:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:4-31:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 33:3-33:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 34:13-37:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 37:20-41:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 41:22-43:9, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) Page 18 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 19 of 65 39 1 2 Thomas Dunn 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Rick Chavez MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Kim Balogh 44:1-44:23(relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 25:4-25:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 26:18-31:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 33:20-35:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 35:17-39:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 39:21-44:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 48:25-50:11, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 52:20-55:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 56:7-57:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 57:20-60:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 60:23-61:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 61:21-62:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 63:19-66:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 66:14-67:19(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 10:16-11:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 20:6-20:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 22:21-24:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 25:3-25:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 29:16-31:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 41:3-42:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 45:9-46:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 47:23-50:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 51:1-53:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 59:13-60:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 63:14-63:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 64:24-70:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 71:10-72:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 73:9-74:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 75:25-76:17, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:17-78:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 79:1-81:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 82:8-83:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 84:13-86:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 87:6-87:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:19-96:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 102:21-103:19, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 106:7-107:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 108:17-109:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 110:1-112:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 114:9-118:17(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 12:24-14:4, (relevance, prejudicial, speculative, best evidence rule) 18:3-19:2, (relevance, prejudicial, speculative, best evidence rule) 19:11-20:24, (relevance, prejudicial, speculative, best evidence rule) 22:4-25:20, (relevance, prejudicial, speculative, best evidence rule) 26:22-29:15, (relevance, prejudicial, speculative, best evidence rule) 30:9-33:5, (relevance, prejudicial, speculative, best evidence rule) 33:14-33:23 (relevance, prejudicial, speculative, best evidence rule) Page 19 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 20 of 65 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 David Olivieri John 11:24-14:2, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 14:14-15:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 16:25-17:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 20:1-20:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 24:4-24:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 26:2-26:24, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 28:3-28:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 30:3-30:17, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 31:14-32:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 32:17-36:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 36:7-37:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 37:22-42:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 42:15-43:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 44:2-45:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 49:7-50:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 51:8-51:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 52:19-53:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 53:18-54:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 55:19-57:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 57:21-58:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 61:3-62:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 64:14-64:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 65:11-66:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 71:8-73:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:6-77:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:19-78:5(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) Robert Simmons 13:3-13:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 14:24-15:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 19:21-20:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 23:3-25:10, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 28:3-29:11, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 30:6-31:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 34:25-37:8, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 38:24-39:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 41:10-42:14(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) Jaswinder 11:23-13:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) Grover 17:6-17:22, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 20:5-21:8, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 21:21-22:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 23:1-24:11, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 25:2-27:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 29:18-31:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 32:3-33:1, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 35:18-38:21, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 39:2-41:20, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 43:2-43:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 44:16-48:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) Page 20 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 21 of 65 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 Sonalolita Wilson pt. II 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 49:1-49:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 50:8-52:5, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 53:3-55:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 59:5-61:4, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 62:10-64:7, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 66:2-68:17, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 70:4-74:6, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 74:23-76:9, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 77:7-78:15, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 80:3-81:25, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 84:11-85:3, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 89:4-93:12, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:6-94:13, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 94:14-96:18, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 96:21-97:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 8:3-102:14, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 104:7-105:16, (relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 106:6-111:21(relevance, prejudicial, best evidence rule) 170:8-180:1, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 184:2-185:5, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 185:6-186:17, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 187:18-191:4, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 191:15-192:8, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 196:23-198:7, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 205:1-207:17, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 209:24-217:17, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 218:22-220:11, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 222:1-223:20, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 225:3-227:8, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 233:14-236:15, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 237:14-239:14, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 241:7-245:4, (relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 248:3-249:4(relevance, prejudicial, expert opinion, best evidence rule) 20 21 22 VII. The following witnesses may be called by the parties at trial: 23 (a) Plaintiff intends to call the following witnesses at trial: 24 1. Plaintiff, SONALOLITA WILSON c/o /o Bradley S. Mainor, Esq. Joseph J. Wirth, Esq. Ash Marie Blackburn, Esq. Joseph W. Guindy, Esq. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 25 26 27 28 Page 21 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 22 of 65 39 1 Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 464-5000 2 3 2. Nakia McCloud c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100, (702) 388-6336 3. Bobby Warren c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100 (702) 388-6336 4. The FRCP 30(b)(6) Witness for the United States of America c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100 (702) 388-6336 5. Defendant, Liceth Demha-Santiago c/o the Law Offices of Denise McCurry 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. #349 Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 408-3805 6. Defendant, Juan Demha, c/o the Law Offices of Denise McCurry 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. #349, Las Vegas, NV 89128, (702) 408-3805 7. Calvin Hayes Address and phone number unknown 8. Geraldine Gray 1232 Crafton Ave. #B Menton, CA 92359 (909) 562-625 9. Latasha Wilson 3027 N. Orange Ave. Rialto, CA 92377 (909) 543-5163 10. Tamika Williams 6666 W. Washington Ave. Bldg 4, Apt. 123 Las Vegas, NV 89107, (702) 472-4134 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 22 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 23 of 65 39 1 11. Makita Cooper 2093. Guthrie, Apt. C Highland, CA 92404 (909) 684-1444 12. Robert Lee Hinton 98 S. Martin Luther King, Apt. 234 Las Vegas, NV 89106 (810) 618-1344 13. Michael Tucker 98 S. Martin Luther King, Apt. 234 Las Vegas, NV 89106 (503) 209-9954 14. Candice Hinton 98 S. Martin Luther King, Apt. 234 Las Vegas, NV 89106 phone number unknown 15. Officer Ireland, Badge # 6044 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 400 S. Martin Luther King Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 828-3111 16. Officer Swan, Badge # 7303 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 400 S. Martin Luther King Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 828-3111 17. Jaswinder Grover, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Nevada Spine Clinic 7401 Smoke Ranch Rd. #150 Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 320-8111 18. Babuk Ghuman, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Nevada Spine Clinic 7140 Smoke Ranch Rd. #150 Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 320-8111 19. Mark Glyman, M.D., DDS, FACS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 23 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 24 of 65 39 1 FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Mark Glyman, M.D., DDS, FACS 1775 Village Center Cir, #150 Las Vegas, NV, 89113 (702) 507-5555 2 3 4 20. Thomas Dunn, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Desert Orthopedic Center 2800 E. Dessert Inn Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89121 (702) 731-1616 21. Don Nobis, MSPT FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Don Nobis Physical Therapy 1950 E. Desert inn Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89169 (702) 735-1501 22. Louie Jan Singson, RN Care Pro Home Health 5280 S. Eastern Ave, G2 Las Vegas, NV 89119 (702) 430-9517 23. Philip M. Paleracio, DDS Dental Center of NV, 5280 S. Eastern Ave, G2 Las Vegas, NV 89119 (702) 430-9517 24. David Oliveri, M.D. 851 S. Rampart Dr., # 115, Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 778-9300 25. Ira Spector, M.S., C.R.C. 3440 E. Russell Rd., #208 Las Vegas, NV 89120, (702) 214-4294 26. Samuel Terry Exhibit A P.O. Box 530111 Henderson, NV 89053 27. Robert Simmons 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 24 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 25 of 65 39 1 1911 E. Gary Way Phoenix, AZ 85042 2 3 28. Michael Freeman Med Dr. Ph.D., Forensic Research & Analysis 4256 NW 10th Ave. # 306 Portland, OR 97209 29. Frank Perez, Ph.D., 4435 N. First St., #205 Livermore, CA 30. Kimberly E. Balough, MSBE BiCoastal Forensics LLC 21143 Hawthrone Boulevard, Suite 415 Torrance, CA 90503 (480) 540-6213 31. James G. Lowe, MD, FACS Lowe-Greenwood-Zerbo Spinal Associates 1999 New Road, Suite B Linwood, NJ, 08221 (609) 601-6363 32. Mark Remas, MA, CRC, ABVE The Remas Group 7710 Balboa Avenue, Suite 218-H San Diego, CA, 92111 (858) 560-6733 33. Warren M. Torchinsky, DDS 223 East Main Street Maple Shade, NJ, 08052 (856) 667-7900 34. Thomas F. Cargill, PhD, LTD, 65 Bennington Court, Reno NV, 89511 (702) 849-1588 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 a) Plaintiff may call the following witnesses at trial if the need arises (the number of witnesses on this list that may be called heavily depends on Defendant’s position as to the admissibility of Plaintiff’s medical records): 25 26 27 1. Erica Johnson, the FRCP 30(b)(6) Witness(es) and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Records for Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 400 S. Martin Luther King Blvd. 28 Page 25 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 26 of 65 39 1 Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 828-3111 2 3 2. Kimberly E. Balough, MSBE BiCoastal Forensics LLC 21143 Hawthrone Boulevard, Suite 415 Torrance, CA 90503 (480) 540-6213 3. James G. Lowe, MD, FACS Lowe-Greenwood-Zerbo Spinal Associates 1999 New Road, Suite B Linwood, NJ, 08221 (609) 601-6363 4. Mark Remas, MA, CRC, ABVE The Remas Group 7710 Balboa Avenue, Suite 218-H San Diego, CA, 92111 (858) 560-6733 5. Warren M. Torchinsky, DDS 223 East Main Street Maple Shade, NJ, 08052 (856) 667-7900 6. Thomas F. Cargill, PhD, LTD, 65 Bennington Court, Reno NV, 89511 (702) 849-1588 7. Rick Chavez, MD Pain and Addiction Integrated Network, Inc., 4733 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 625 Torrance, CA, 90506 (323) 833-8269 8. Julie Shaked, Special Field Claims Representative Farmers Insurance Company P.O. Box 268994 Oklahoma City, OK, 73126-8994 (800) 435-7764 9. Jason Regester, Fleet Services Representative General Services Administration Phoenix Fleet Management Center GSA Fleet, Zone 4, 702-605-9892 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 26 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 27 of 65 39 1 2 10. David Holland c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100 (702) 388-6336 11. Jared Robbins c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100 (702) 388-6336 12. Glen Banks, EMT FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Las Vegas Fire Rescue 500 N. Casino Center Blvd., Lane Las Vegas, NV 89101 13. Carlos Maltiz, Advanced EMT FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Las Vegas Fire Rescue 500 N. Casino Center Blvd., Lane Las Vegas, NV 89101 14. Jefferson D. Bracey, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able Rec EMP or Clark, (collectively Dr. Bracey), 901 Rancho Dr., #207, Las Vegas, NV 89106, (702) 385-0890 15. Sandra Lee, MD FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable able for Desert Radiologist 2020 Palomino Ln., Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 759-8600 16. Van Nguyen, MD, FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Desert Radiologist 2020 Palomino Ln. Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 759-8600 17. Brent Yamishita, P.T., D.P.T FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Better Back Physical Therapy 1740 Smoke Ranch Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 27 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 28 of 65 39 1 18. Magdalen Marron, PTA FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Better Back Physical Therapy 1740 Smoke Ranch Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 19. Nicole Hoffman, PT. MSPT,ART Practitioner FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Better Back Physical Therapy 1740 Smoke Ranch Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 20. Monique A. Mogensen, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Records for American Radiology 6460 Medical Center Dr., #150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 868-278 21. Michael B. Zlatkin, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Records for American Radiology 6460 Medical Center Dr., #150 Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 868-2781 22. Matt Treinen, D.O. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable for Pueblo Medical Imaging 8551 W. Lake Mead Blvd., #150 Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 228-003 23. Raj Agrawal, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Desert Radiology 2020 Palomino Lane Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 759-8600 24. Janet Bauman, Ph.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable LF Mortillaro, Ph.D., LTD 501 S. Rancho Dr. #F37, Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 388-9403 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 28 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 29 of 65 39 1 25. Duff Kaster, D.D.S. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Abbey Dental 4408 S. Eastern Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89119 (702) 731-5700 26. John Lyons, PT FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Lyons Home Care 600 S. Tonapah Dr. #230 Las Vegas, NV 89106-8912 (702) 476-0222 27. Damon Elliot, PTA FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Lyons Home Care 600 S. Tonapah Dr. #230 Las Vegas, NV 89106-8912 (702) 476-0222 28. Apichai Haisupa, PT, FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Lyons Home Care 600 S. Tonapah Dr. #230 Las Vegas, NV 89106-8912 (702) 476-0222 29. Danny Thai, RPh FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable LienRx 2600 W. Sahara Ave. Las Vegas NV 89102 (702) 257-2620 30. James Peterson, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Records for Desert Radiology 2020 Palomino Lane, Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 759-8600 31. Sukhjinder Singh, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Desert Radiology 2020 Palomino Lane, Las Vegas, NV 89106 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 29 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 30 of 65 39 1 2 (702) 759-8600 32. 3 4 5 6 33. 7 8 34. Daniel Thai RPh FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable LienRx 26000 W. Sahara Ave. # 120 Las Vegas, NV 89102 35. Lori Ortale, RPh FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Las Vegas Pharmacy 2600 W. Sahara Ave. # 120 Las Vegas, NV 89102 36. Michael Lundberg, D.O. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Mountain View Hospital 3100 N. Tenaya Way Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 962-5000 37. Amit Valera, D.O. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Mountains Edge Hospital 8656 W. Patrick Ln. Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 777-7100 38. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Valley Hospital 620 Shadow Lane Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 388-4000 39. Huy N. Nguyen, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 David Plunkett, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Records for Desert Radiology 2020 Palomino Lane, Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 759-8600 The FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable PayLater Pharmacy 552 E. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89104 28 Page 30 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 31 of 65 39 1 Valley Hospital 620 Shadow Lane Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 853-3000 2 3 4 40. Badreldin A. Ibrahim, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Smoke Ranch Specialists 41. Magalen Page, PTA FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Kindred Transitional Care and Rehabilitation 5850 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89118 (702) 470-1102 42. Amir Aftab, M.D FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Kindred Transitional Care and Rehabilitation 5850 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89118 (702) 470-1102 43. Ali Badday, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable American Radiology 7140 Smoke Ranch Rd. Ste. B Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 868-2781 44. Dr. Badday FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Precision Diagnostic Imaging/Upright MRI 6460 Medical Center Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 45. Michael Abiog, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable American Radiology/Precision Diagnostic Imaging 7140 Smoke Ranch Rd. Ste. B Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 868-2781 46. Ken Hughes, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Desert Anesthesiologists, Inc. 6655 W. Sahara Ave. #B200 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 31 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 32 of 65 39 1 Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702) 933-3999 2 3 47. Christopher Milford, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Christopher M. Milford, M.D. 2585 Montessouri St., #100 Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 272-0694 48. Danny Thai FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Specialty Pharmacy 241 N. Buffalo Dr. # 150 Las Vegas, NV 89145 49. Daniel T. Shiode Ph.D., ABPP FRCP 30(b)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Shiode Psychotherapy, Inc. 501 S. Rancho Dr. , Ste I-64 Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 384-4110 50. Russell Shah, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Radar Medical Group 2628 W. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89102 (702) 644-0600 51. Michael I. Rothman, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Records for Opensided MRI 600 Rancho Dr. # 101, Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 932-2740 52. Keith Lewis, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Opensided MRI 600 Rancho Dr. # 101 Las Vegas, NV 89106 (702) 932-2740 53. Decorah Perkins, NP. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Grand Desert Psychiatric Services 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 32 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 33 of 65 39 1 2021 S. Jones Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702) 202-0099 2 3 54. Anita Rich, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Precision Diagnostic Imaging 7140 Smoke Ranch Rd Ste. B Las Vegas,NV 89128 (702) 868-2781 55. Simon Farrow, M.D. FRCP 30(b0(6) witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Monitoring Associates 9811 W. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89117 (833) 664-6342 56. Craig Carroll, D.O. NRCP 30(b0(6) witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Monitoring Associates 9811 W. Charleston Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89117 (833) 664-6342 57. Zahld Hamid, M.D FRCP 30(b0(6) witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Dr. Hamid 9811 W. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89117, (833) 664-6342 58. Mike Phillips FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Next Step Medical 8285 W. Arby Ave. Ste. 155 Las Vegas, NV 89113 59. Demetrice Davis, M.D. FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Red Rock Radiology Associates 7130 Smoke Ranch Rd STE 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 60. Ronald F Sauer, Jr., DO FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Red Rock Radiology Associates 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 33 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 34 of 65 39 1 7130 Smoke Ranch Rd STE 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 2 3 61. Edward Sisson, CPO FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or the Person Most Knowledgeable Prove Partners, LLC, Prosthetic Center of Excellence 2047 West Charleston Blvd Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89102 62. Dawn Neilson, CFom FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Prove Partners, LLC, Prosthetic Center of Excellence 2047 West Charleston Blvd Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89102 63. FRCP 30(b)(6) witness, and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Dental/Southern Nevada General Dentistry Prada, PPLC, 2250 S. Rancho Dr., #205, Las Vegas, NV 89102 (702) 291-2031 64. Mark Lawrence, RTP FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and/or Person Most Knowledgeable Don Nobis Physical Therapy 1950 E. Desert inn Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89169 (702) 735-1501 65. Plaintiff reserves the right to call any witnesses identified in Defendants’ witness 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 list and named during the course of discovery; 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 66. Plaintiff reserves the right to call rebuttal and/or impeachment witnesses at trial; 67. Plaintiff reserves the right to call any of Defendants’ experts as witnesses. Defendant, USA, objects to the vast number of witnesses and potential witnesses provided by Plaintiff above. In addition, Defendant, USA objects to the designation of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) witness as that rule applies to deposition testimony and not testimony related to trial. Furthermore, Plaintiff fails to list specific topics to be covered by any 30(b)(6) witness. Defendant USA reserves all rights of objections to testimonies at trial including but not limited to any expert opinions that were not timely disclosed in discovery, lack foundation, and/or are not relevant and reliable. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), 37(c)(1), Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. Page 34 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 35 of 65 39 1 579 (1993) and its progeny. Defendant, USA, also objects to testimony by any witness that was not 2 disclosed during the discovery period or whose testimony was already excluded by the Court, 3 including Dr. Oliveri. 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (a) Defendant USA’s Witnesses 1. Nakia McCloud c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100, (702) 388-6336 2. Plaintiff, SONALOLITA WILSON c/o /o Bradley S. Mainor, Esq. Joseph J. Wirth, Esq. Ash Marie Blackburn, Esq. Joseph W. Guindy, Esq. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 464-5000 3. Defendant, Liceth Demha-Santiago c/o the Law Offices of Denise McCurry 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. #349 Las Vegas, NV 89128 (702) 408-3805 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4. Defendant, Juan Demha, c/o the Law Offices of Denise McCurry 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. #349, Las Vegas, NV 89128, (702) 408-3805 5. Kimberly E. Balough, MSBE BiCoastal Forensics LLC 21143 Hawthrone Boulevard, Suite 415 Torrance, CA 90503 (480) 540-6213 24 25 26 27 6. Rick Chavez, MD Pain and Addiction Integrated Network, Inc., 4733 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 625 Torrance, CA, 90506 (323) 833-8269 28 Page 35 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 36 of 65 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7. James G. Lowe, MD, FACS Lowe-Greenwood-Zerbo Spinal Associates 1999 New Road, Suite B Linwood, NJ, 08221 (609) 601-6363 8. Mark Remas, MA, CRC, ABVE The Remas Group 7710 Balboa Avenue, Suite 218-H San Diego, CA, 92111 (858) 560-6733 9. Warren M. Torchinsky, DDS 223 East Main Street Maple Shade, NJ, 08052 (856) 667-7900 10. Thomas F. Cargill, PhD, LTD, 65 Bennington Court, Reno NV, 89511 (702) 849-1588 Defendant, USA, reserves the right to call any witnesses identified in Plaintiff’s witness list and named during the course of discovery; 11. Defendant reserves the right to call rebuttal and/or impeachment witnesses at trial; 12. Defendant reserves the right to call any of Plaintiff’s experts as witnesses. (b) Defendants’ DEMHA-SANTIAGO, and DEMHA’s Witnesses 17 18 1. Plaintiff, SONALOLITA WILSON c/o /o Bradley S. Mainor, Esq. Joseph J. Wirth, Esq. Ash Marie Blackburn, Esq. Joseph W. Guindy, Esq. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148 (702) 464-5000 2. Nakia McCloud c/o United States Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100, (702) 388-6336 3. Defendant Liceth Demha-Santiago c/o Hall Jaffe and Clayton, LLP 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 36 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 37 of 65 39 1 7425 Peak Drive Las Vegas, NV 89128 2 3 4. Defendant Juan Demha c/o Hall Jaffe and Clayton, LLP 7425 Peak Drive Las Vegas, NV 89128 5. Officer Swan, Badge No. 7303 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 400 South Martin Luther King Boulevard Las Vegas, NV 89103 6. Hugh S. Selznick, MD Consultants Medical Group 2500 West Sahar Ave., Suite 207 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 Las Vegas, NV 89102 11 7. 12 13 witness list and named during the course of discovery; 8. 14 15 Defendants reserve the right to call any and all witnesses identified in Plaintiff’s Defendants reserve the right to call any and all witnesses identified in Defendant USA’s witness list and named during the course of discovery; 9. Defendants reserve the right to call rebuttal and/or impeachment witnesses at 18 10. Defendants reserve the right to call any of Plaintiff’s experts as witnesses. 19 11. Defendants reserve the right to call any of Defendant USA’s experts as 16 17 20 trial; witnesses. VIII. 21 22 The attorneys or parties have met and jointly offer these trial dates: 23 November28, 2022 through December 2, 2022 24 January 17, 2023 through 2023 25 January 23, 2023 through January 27, 2023 26 February 13, 2023 through February 17, 2023 27 February 21, 2023 through February 24, 2023 28 It is expressly understood by the undersigned that the court will set the trial of this matter Page 37 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 38 of 65 39 1 on one of the agreed-upon dates if possible; if not, the trial will be set at the convenience of the 2 court’s calendar. 3 4 Plaintiff estimates that the trial will take a total of 17-21 days. Defendant USA will not 5 stipulate to the authenticity of Plaintiff’s medical records. As such, Plaintiff will be required to call 6 a witness from each of her facilities to authenticate records from all forty-four (44) medical 7 providers. Defendants Demha-Santiago and Demha had no objection to stipulating to the 8 authenticity of Plaintiff’s medical records. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 9 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 IX. Defendant USA believes the number of witnesses Plaintiff intends to call is excessive and 10 less time is needed. Defendant USA believes it can present its case-in-chief in 2-3 days. 11 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 12 DATED this 11th day of May, 2022. DATED this 11th day of May, 2022. 13 MAINOR WIRTH, LLP HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP _/s/Ash Marie Blackburn____________ BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7434 ASH MARIE BLACKBURN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14712 6018 S. Fort Apache Road, Ste. 150 Las Vegas, NV 89148-5652 Counsel for Plaintiff _/s/ Jan Tomasik________________________ STEVEN T. JAFFE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7035 JAN K. TOMASIK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15104 7425 Peak Drive Las Vegas, NV 89128 Attorneys for Defendant/CrossClaimant/Cross-Defendant Juan Demha And Cross-Claimant/Cross-Defendant Liceth Dehma-Santiago 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED this 11th day of May, 2022. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY _/s/ Skyler Pearson______________ SKYLER PEARSON, ESQ. PATRICK ROSE, ESQ. 501 Las Vegas Blvd, South., Ste. 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorney for Defendant United States of America Page 38 of 39 Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document 124 122 Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22 Page 39 of 65 39 1 X. 2 ACTION BY THE COURT 3 This case is set for jury trial on January 23, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Calendar call will be held 4 on January 18, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. This pretrial order has been approved by the parties to this 5 action as evidenced by their signatures or the signatures of their attorneys hereon, and the order 6 is hereby entered and will govern the trial of this case. This order may not be amended except by 7 court order and based upon the parties’ agreement or to prevent manifest injustice. 8 9 DATED: May 20, 2022. , 2022. MAINOR WIRTH, LLP 6018 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (702) 464-5000 | Fax: (702) 463-4440 10 11 12 _____________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 39 of 39 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-1Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 401ofof65 1 1 EXHIBIT A 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 SONALOLITA WILSON Plaintiff 5 vs. 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 7 8 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Stipulated Exhibits Defendants. 9 10 CASE NO.: Exhibit Description 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1. Manpower Employment File 2. Plaintiff’s Employment Records From Staffmark 3. TrueBlue Records/ Peopleready Regarding Plaintiff’s Earnings Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-2Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 411ofof65 4 1 EXHIBIT A-1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 SONALOLITA WILSON Plaintiff 5 vs. 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN 7 DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 8 Defendants. 9 10 1. 12 2. 13 3. 14 4. 5. 6. 18 Stipulated Exhibits Available For Use At The Time of Trial But Are Not Currently Admitted Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint Defendant United States’ Answer to Plainitff’s First Amended Complaint Defendants’ Liceth Demha-Santiago and Juan Demha’s Answer to Plainitff’s First Amended Complaint 16 17 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Exhibit Description 11 15 CASE NO.: 7. 8. Life Expectance Table Transcripts of Deposition of Babuk Guman, M.D., With Exhibits Transcript of Deposition of Rick Chavez, M.D., With Exhibits Transcript of deposition of Liceth Demha Transcript of deposition of Mark L. Glyman, M.D., D.D.S., F.A.C.S., with 19 exhibits 20 9. 21 10. 22 11. 12. 23 13. 24 Transcript of deposition of Robert L. Hinton Transcript of deposition of Duff Kaster, D.D.S., with exhibits Transcript of deposition of Nakia McCloud, with exhibits Transcript of deposition of Sonalolita G. Wilson, with exhibits. Vol 1 Transcript of deposition of Sonalolita G. Wilson, with exhibits Vol 2 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-2Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 422ofof65 4 1 14. 2 15. 3 16. 4 17. 18. 5 19. 6 7 20. 21. 8 22. 9 23. 10 11 25. 26. 14 15 27. 28. 29. 16 17 20 33. 22 23 24 Transcript of deposition of Thomas Dunn, M.D Transcript of deposition of Jaswinder Grover, M.D Transcript of deposition of Frank A. Perez, Ph.D David Oliveri, M.D. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule David Oliveri, M.D. Expert Report dated December 2, 2019 David Oliveri, M.D. Supplemental Expert Report dated August 4, 2020 Ira Spector M.S. C.R.C, M.D. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Ira Spector M.S. C.R.C, Expert Report dated December 12, 2019 Ira Spector M.S. C.R.C, Rebuttal Expert Report dated July 23, 2020 Samuel R. Terry Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Samuel R. Terry Expert Report dated June 3, 2020 Michael D. Freeman, MedDr, PhD, MPH, DLM, FAAFS Curriculum Vitae Michael D. Freeman, MedDr, PhD, MPH, DLM, FAAFS Expert Report dated Michael D. Freeman, MedDr, PhD, MPH, DLM, FAAFS Rebuttal Expert Report dated August 5, 2020 31. 32. 21 Transcript of deposition of Robert Simmons July 8, 2020 30. 18 19 Transcript of deposition of David J. Oliveri M.D Schedule 24. 12 13 Transcript of deposition of Kimberly E. Balogh 34. 35. 36. Frank Perez, Ph.D Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Frank Perez, PhD, FAAFS Expert Report dated July 8, 2020 Frank Perez, PhD, FAAFS Expert Report dated July 8, 2020 Robert Simmons Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Robert Simmons Rebuttal Expert Report dated August 7, 2020 Terrence M. Clauretie, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule 2 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-2Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 433ofof65 4 1 37. 2 38. 3 39. 4 40. 41. 5 42. 6 7 43. 44. 8 45. 9 46. 10 47. 11 48. 49. 12 50. 13 51. 14 52. 15 53. 16 54. 17 18 19 Thomas Dunn, MD Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Thomas Dunn, MD Rebuttal Expert Report dated August 3, 2020 Travis Snyder, D.O. Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Travis Snyder, D.O. Rebuttal Expert Report dated August 7, 2020 Travis Snyder, D.O. Presentation Kimberly Balogh’s Expert Report (dated July 7, 2020) Kimberly Balogh’s Rebuttal Expert Report (dated August 7, 2020) Kimberly Balogh’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Deposition of Kimberly Balogh (November 4, 2020) Dr. James Lowe’s Expert Report (dated April 27, 2020) Dr. James Lowe’s Rebuttal Expert Report (dated July 27, 2020) Dr. James Lowe’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Dr. Rick Chavez’s Expert Report (dated July 7, 2020) Dr. Rick Chavez’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Deposition of Chavez (August 27, 2020) Dr. Warren Torchinsky’s Expert Report (dated November 12, 2019) Dr. Warren Torchinsky’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule 55. 56. 57. 20 58. 21 Terrence M. Clauretie, Ph.D. Expert Report dated February 4, 2020 59. 22 Mark Remas’s Expert Report (dated April 28, 2020) Mark Remas’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Dr. Thomas Cargill’s Rebuttal Expert Report (dated August 3, 2020) Dr. Thomas Cargill’s Curriculum Vitae, Testimony List, and Fess Schedule Curriculum Vitae, Fee schedule, Prior Testimony List and Reports authored by Mark Glyman, M.D., DDS, FACS 23 60. 24 61. Google Overhead Photo Depicting the Subject Intersection (1) Google Overhead Photo Depicting the Subject Intersection (2) 3 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-2Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 444ofof65 4 1 62. 2 63. 3 64. 4 65. 66. 5 67. 6 7 68. 69. Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (1) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (2) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (3) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (4) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (5) Color Photo Depicting the Scene of the Subject Incident (6) Black and White Photo Depicting Plaintiff’s Property Damage (1) Black and White Photo Depicting Plaintiff’s Property Damage (2) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 4 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page451 of of 65 10 1 EXHIBIT B 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 CASE NO.: SONALOLITA WILSON Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Exhibits 5 vs. 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 7 8 Defendants. 9 10 11 Exhibit Description Traffic Accident Report #LVM160901003306 2. Traffic Accident Report #LVM160901002946 Prejudicial, Relevance, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule 3. Custodian of Records for 911 recordings and breakdown 911 Recordings Relevance, Prejudicial 5. Transcribed Statement of Def. Demha-Santiago 6. IRS Incident Report Privileged, Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule 7. Color Photo Depicting Plaintiff’s Property Damage 14 15 16 4. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Defendants DemhaSantiago and Demha’s Objections Prejudicial, Relevance, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule 1. 12 13 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK Relevance, Prejudicial Defendant USA’s Objections Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence Hearsay; prejudicial; authenticity Hearsay; prejudicial; authenticity Prejudicial; foundation; best evidence Privileged; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence (No Bates Number Provided) Relevance; foundation; authenticity Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page462 of of 65 10 1 8. Farmers Insurance Exchange Property Damage Estimate of Plaintiff’s Vehicle Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 9. Black Box Data for Defendant’s Vehicle GMC Terrain 2014 Relevance, Prejudicial 10. Vehicle information regarding vehicle driven by Nikia McCloud’s Relevance, Prejudicial 11. Plaintiff’s Employee Wage Sheet with Manpower Plaintiff’s Employment Records From Staffmark Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12. 13. 10 11 14. TrueBlue Records/ Peopleready Regarding Plaintiff’s Earnings Life Expectance Table 12 13 15. Color Photo of Plaintiff’s Injury Taken by Plaintiff on September 13, 2016 (1) Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 16. Color Photo of Plaintiff’s Injury Taken by Plaintiff on September 13, 2016 (2) Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 17. Relevance, Prejudicial, Video of Plaintiff Foundation, Best Evidence Depicting Full Body Seizure Taken by Robert Rule, Authenticity Hinton Relevance, Prejudicial, Video of Plaintiff Foundation, Best Evidence Depicting Right Leg Spasm Taken by Robert Rule, Authenticity Hinton Relevance, Prejudicial, Video of Plaintiff Foundation, Best Evidence Depicting Leg Spasms Rule, Authenticity 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 18. 22 23 24 19. 2 Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity (No Bates Numbers Provided) Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity (No Bates Numbers Provided) Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page473 of of 65 10 2 evidence; authenticity; hearsay When Walking Taken by Robert Hinton 1 20. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Full Body Seizure Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 21. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Right Leg Spasm Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 22. Video of Plaintiff Depicting Right Leg Spasm Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 23. Plaintiff Medical Specials Chart Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 24. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for City of Las Vegas Fire and Rescue for Date of Service September 1, 2016 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 25. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for City of University Medical Center for Date of Service September 1, 2016 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 26. Medical Records and Billing for McCourt PLLC a/k/a EMP of Clark UMC for Date of Service September 1, 2016 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 27. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Desert Radiology Solutions Dates of Service Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 3 Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity; hearsay Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page484 of of 65 10 September 1, 206 Through December 6, 2017 1 2 3 28. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Nevada Spine Clinic Dates of Service September 8, 2016 Through April 15, 2022 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 29. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Better Back Physical Therapy Dates of Service September 9, 2016 for Through December 2, 2016 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 30. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Mark Glyman, M.D. Dates of Service September 13, 2016 Through April 7., 2017 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 31. Relevance, Prejudicial, Medical Records and Foundation, Best Evidence Billing with Custodian of Records for American Rule, Authenticity Radiology Date of Service January 11, 2017 Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 32. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Desert Orthopaedics Center Dates of Service September 30, 2016 Through March 15, 2018 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 33. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Pueblo Medical Imaging Dates Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 4 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page495 of of 65 10 of Service September 30, 2016 1 2 34. Medical Records and Billing for Absolute Dental Date of Service October 13, 2016 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 35. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Desert Anesthesiologist, Inc. Date of Service January 11, 2017 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 36. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Specialty Surgery Center Date of Service January 11, 2017 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 37. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Abby Dental Center, Inc. Dates of Service February 27, 2017 Through March 15, 2017 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 38. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Smoke Ranch Surgery Center Dates of Service December 6, 2017 Through December 13, 2021 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 39. Relevance, Prejudicial, Medical Records and Foundation, Best Evidence Billing with Custodian Rule, Authenticity of Records for Don Nobis Progressive Physical Therapy Dates of Service December 26, 2017 Through February 8, 2022 Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page506 of of 65 10 1 40. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Silver State Neurology Dates of Service January 2, 2018 Through February 26, 2018 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 41. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Louis F. Mortillaro Dates of Service November 14, 2018 Through December 5, 2018 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 42. Relevance, Prejudicial, Medical Records and Foundation, Best Evidence Billing for Lien RX Dates of Service January Rule, Authenticity 4, 2017 Through January 23, 2019 Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 43. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Specialty Pharmacy Dates of Service January 4, 2019 Through February 25, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 44. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Smoke Ranch Specialists Dates of Service January 10, 2019 Through May 2, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 45. Medical Records and Billing for CarePro Home Health, Dates of Service January 11, 2019 Through February 11, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 46. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Lyons Home Care Dates of Service January 12, Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 6 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page517 of of 65 10 2019 Through February 1, 2019 1 2 47. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for PayLater Pharmacy Date of Service January 23, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 48. Relevance, Prejudicial, Medical Records and Foundation, Best Evidence Billing with Custodian Rule, Authenticity of Records for Comprehensive Medical Dates of Service January 29, 2019 Through April 26, 2022 Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 49. Relevance, Prejudicial, Medical Records and Foundation, Best Evidence Billing with Custodian of Records for American Rule, Authenticity Medical Response Date of Service May 2, 2019 Through May 20, 2019 Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 50. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Las Vegas Pharmacy Dates of Service March 8, 2019 Through July 1, 2020 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 51. Relevance, Prejudicial, Medical Records and Foundation, Best Evidence Billing with Custodian of Records for Mountain Rule, Authenticity View Hospital Dates of Service May 2, 2019 Through May 3, 2019 Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 52. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Fremont Emergency Services Date of Service May 2, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 53. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 7 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page528 of of 65 10 2 3 54. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Valley Hospital Medical Center Dates of Service May 10, 2019 Through May 12, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 55. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Shadow Emergency Physicians Date of Service May 8, 2019 through May 14, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 56. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Monitoring Associates Date of Service May 15, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 57. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Summerlin Hospital Medical Center Dates of Service May 15, 2019 Through May 20, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 58. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Kindred Hospital Las VegasSahara Campus Dates of Service May 21, 2019 Through July 4, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 59. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Next Step Medical Date of Service July 3, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 evidence; authenticity Mountains Edge Hospital Dates of Service May 3, 2019 Through May 6, 2019 1 8 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page539 of of 65 10 1 60. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Dental Centerof Nevada Date of Service September 16, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 61. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Zynex Medical, Inc. Date of Service November 21, 2019 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 62. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Shiode Psychotherapy, Inc. Dates of Service December 12, 2019 Through March 9, 2020 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 63. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Radar Medical Group Dates of Service January 16, 2020 Through August 7, 2020 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 64. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Open Sided MRI Dates of Service February 2, 2020 Through February 7, 2020 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 65. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Grand Desert Psychiatric Services Dates of Service March 16, 2020 Through May 14, 2020 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 66. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Las Vegas Health Services Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 9 Case Case2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document122-3 124 Filed Filed05/20/22 05/11/22 Page Page54 10ofof65 10 2 3 67. Medical Records and Billing for Silver State Adult Day care Dates of Service October 1, 2020 Through November 4, 2021 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 68. Medical Records and Billing with Custodian of Records for Prove Partners Dates of Service May 12, 2021 Through February 8, 2022 Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 69. Defendant United State’s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation 70. Defendant United State’s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production Defendant objects to the improper use of USA’s written discovery responses as trial exhibits. The responses mistake evidence. Relevance, Prejudicial, Hearsay, Best Evidence Rule, Foundation Defendant objects to the improper use of USA’s written discovery responses as trial exhibits. The responses mistake evidence. Relevance, Prejudicial, Hearsay, Best Evidence Rule, Foundation 71. Defendant Liceth Demha Santiago’s Responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories 72. Defendant Liceth Demha Santiago’s Responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 evidence; authenticity Dates of Service July 8, 2020 Through August 4, 2020 1 Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation 22 23 24 10 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-4Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 551ofof65 2 1 EXHIBIT C 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 SONALOLITA WILSON CASE NO.: Plaintiff Defendant United States of America’s Exhibits vs. 6 7 8 2:18-CV-01241-JCM-NJK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I THROUGH X; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH X, 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Defendant United States of America hereby provide its list of trial exhibits: Exhibit Description Defendants DemhaPlaintiff’s Ex No. Santiago and Demha’s Objections Objections 2018 W-4 Completed Form Relevance, 504 for Sonalolita Wilson Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 506 18 19 20 507 21 22 23 508 24 25 26 27 509 Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories (dated May 31, 2019) Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories (dated November 8, 2019) Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories (dated January 28, 2021) Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Response to Defendant USA’s First Set of Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; 28 1 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-4Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 562ofof65 2 1 Ex No. 2 3 4 510 5 6 7 511 8 9 10 512 11 12 13 513 14 15 16 514 17 18 19 20 515 Exhibit Description Defendants DemhaSantiago and Demha’s Objections Plaintiff’s Objections Interrogatories (dated February 5, 2021) best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant United States’ Second Set of Interrogatories (dated November 22, 2019) Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant United States’ Third Set of Interrogatories (dated March 20, 2020) Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Demha’s First Set of Interrogatories Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Defendant Demha’s First Set of Interrogatories Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Response to Defendant Demha’s First Set of Interrogatories (February 5, 2021) Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Demha Defendants’ Answers to Plaintiffs’ Interrogatories (dated February 28, 2020) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 571ofof65 9 1 EXHIBIT D 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 SONALOLITA WILSON, CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NKJ 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 7 vs. Defendant Liceth Demha-Santiago and Juan Demha’s Exhibits UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LICETH DEMHA-SANTIAGO; JUAN DEMHA; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive 8 Defendants. 9 10 11 12 Exhibit Description 1. Damage Estimate of 2005 Toyota Corolla 2. Farmers Insurance Exchange Estimate of Record for 2005 Toyota Corolla CCC One Market Valuation Report 13 14 15 3. 4. Medical Records and Billing from Mark L. Glyman M.D. 5. Medical Records, Billing and Films from American Radiology Medical Records and Billing from Nevada Spine Clinic 16 17 18 6. 19 20 7. 21 8. 22 23 9. Medical Records and Billing from Smoke Ranch Surgery Center Medical Records and Billing from Don Nobis Progressive Physical Therapy Billing from Abbey Dental Center, Inc. Defendant USA’s Plaintiff’s Objections Objections Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best 24 1 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 582ofof65 9 1 10. Medical Records and Billing from Absolute Dental 11. Billing from Las Vegas Pharmacy 12. Medical records, films and billing from Kindred Rehabilitation Hospital Billing from Smoke Ranch Specialists 2 3 4 5 6 13. 7 14. Medical records and billing from Daniel Shiode, Ph.D. 9 15. 10 16. Grand Desert Psychiatric Services Medical records and billing from Monitoring Associates/Neuromonitoring Associates Medical records and billing from Zynex 8 11 12 17. 13 14 15 18. 19. 16 17 18 20. 21. 19 20 21 24 Medical Records and Billing from Las Vegas Health Services, Inc. Medical Records and Billing from Silver State Neurology 22. Next Step Medical 23. Medical Billing from Prove Partners 24. Medical billing and records Absolute Dental/Southern Nevada General Dentistry 22 23 Medical records and films from Precision Diagnostic Imaging Records and billing from Silver State Adult Day Care evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 2 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 593ofof65 9 1 25. 2 3 26. 4 5 6 27. 28. 7 8 9 29. 30. 10 11 31. 12 13 14 32. 33. 15 16 17 34. 35. 18 19 20 36. 37. 21 22 23 24 38. 39. Prada, PPLC Medical billing and records for Care Pro Home Health Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Medical billing and records hearsay; foundation; best for Dental Center of NV evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Las Vegas Fire and Rescue Receipts hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity University Medical Center of Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best Southern Nevada Receipt evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; EMP of Clark UMC McCourt PLLC Medical hearsay; foundation; best Group Receipt evidence; authenticity University Medical Center of Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best Southern Nevada, evidence; authenticity Department of Radiology Records Relevance; prejudicial; Better Back Physical Therapy under Nevada Spine hearsay; foundation; best Clinic evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Mark L. Glyman, M.D., D.D.S. hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Desert Orthopaedic Center hearsay; foundation; best Health Insurance Claim evidence; authenticity Form Relevance; prejudicial; Pueblo Medical Imaging hearsay; foundation; best Records evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Specialty Surgery Center hearsay; foundation; best Records evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Better Back Physical Therapy Responsive Medical hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Records Relevance; prejudicial; Desert Orthopaedic Center Responsive Medical Records hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Dr. Mark Glyman Responsive Medical Records hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Las Vegas Fire and Rescue Responsive Records hearsay; foundation; best 3 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 604ofof65 9 1 40. 2 3 41. 4 5 6 42. 43. 7 8 9 44. 45. 10 11 12 46. 47. 13 14 15 48. 49. 16 17 18 50. 51. 19 20 52. 21 22 23 24 53. 54. evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Pueblo Medical Imaging Responsive Medical Records hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Specialty Surgery Center Responsive Medical Records hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; University Medical Center Responsive Medical Records hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Desert Orthopaedic Center hearsay; foundation; best Responsive Radiology evidence; authenticity Images Relevance; prejudicial; Specialty Surgery Center hearsay; foundation; best Responsive Billing Records evidence; authenticity Lien RX Billing Responsive Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best Records evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Orthopedic Specialty hearsay; foundation; best Hospital of Nevada Responsive Medical Records evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Orthopedic Specialty hearsay; foundation; best Hospital of Nevada evidence; authenticity Responsive Billing Records Relevance; prejudicial; Mountain View Hospital Responsive Medical Records hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Lyons Home Care hearsay; foundation; best Responsive Medical and evidence; authenticity Billing Records Relevance; prejudicial; Better Back Physical Therapy Responsive Medical hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Records Relevance; prejudicial; Specialty Surgery Center hearsay; foundation; best Responsive Medical and Billing Records evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Kindred Transitional Care and Rehabilitation-Spring hearsay; foundation; best Valley Responsive Medical evidence; authenticity Records Relevance; prejudicial; Valley Hospital Medical hearsay; foundation; best Center Responsive Medical evidence; authenticity Records Relevance; prejudicial; University Medical Center Responsive Medical Records hearsay; foundation; best 4 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 615ofof65 9 1 55. 2 3 56. 4 5 57. 6 7 8 58. Valley Hospital Responsive Radiology Discs (2) 59. Summerlin Hospital Responsive Medical and Billing Records Red Rock Diagnostics Responsive Medical and Billing Records 986 Pharmacy Responsive Billing Records 9 10 11 60. 61. 12 13 14 62. 63. 15 16 17 64. 65. 18 19 20 66. 67. 21 22 23 24 and Billing Records University Medical Center Responsive Radiology Declaration and Records (disc) Dr. Louis F. Mortillaro Responsive Medical and Billing Records Abbey Dental Responsive Records and X-Rays 68. 69. Mountain View Hospital Responsive Radiology Records and Disc (1) Paylater Pharmacy Responsive Billing Records Desert Orthopaedic Center Responsive Medical and Billing Records Desert Radiology Responsive Medical Records and Radiology Discs Pueblo Medical Imaging Responsive Medical Records Pueblo Medical Imaging Response Radiology Records Mountain View Responsive Billing Records Summerlin Hospital Responsive Radiology evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best 5 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 626ofof65 9 1 70. 2 3 71. 4 5 6 72. 73. 7 8 9 74. 75. 10 11 12 76. 77. 13 14 15 78. Records Pueblo Medical Imaging Responsive Billing Records Better Back Physical Therapy Responsive Billing Records OpenSided MRI Responsive Medical Records Dr. David Oliveri Responsive Medical and Billing Records Radar Medical Group Responsive Medical and Billing Records OpenSided MRI Responsive Medical and Radiology Records (disc) Red Rock Diagnostics Responsive Billing Records for OpenSided MRI Desert Anesthesiologist Responsive Billing and Medical Records Allegiant Spine Institute 79. Certified Vocational Services 80. Las Vegas Fire and Rescue 81. Specialty Pharmacy 82. Sonia Wilson’s Summary Slide of Imaging Findings Consistent with the History of Trauma Dated 9/1/16 Life Expectancy Table 16 evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance, Prejudicial, Foundation, Best Evidence Rule, Authenticity 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 83. Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; hearsay; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity 6 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 637ofof65 9 1 84. Defendant, Liceth DemhaSantiago’s Responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents Defendants Liceth DemhaSantiago & Juan Demha’s Answers to Plaintiffs’ Interrogatories Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Defendant United States’ First Set of Interrogatories Plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Response to Defendant USA’s First Set of Interrogatories Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read 89. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Demha’s First Set of Interrogatories Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read 90. Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Defendant Demha’s First Set of Interrogatories Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read 91. Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Response to Defendant Demha’s First Set of Interrogatories Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read 92. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant USA’s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read 93. Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Defendant USA’s First Set Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular 2 3 85. 4 5 86. 6 7 8 87. 9 10 88. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Defendant USA herein reserve all objections pending notice of particular responses to be read 7 Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 648ofof65 9 1 2 94. 3 4 95. 5 of Requests for Production of Documents Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Response to Defendant USA’s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents Plaintiff’s Response to United States’ Second Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff 6 7 96. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant United States’ Third Set of Interrogatories 97. United States’ Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for Production of Documents United States’ Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories Photographs of Plaintiff’s vehicle 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 98. 99. 100. Google Overheads 101. T-Mobile Phone Records 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 102. Black Box Data for Defendant’s Vehicle - GMC Terrain 2014 103. IRS Claim Denial with Receipt February 9, 2018 104. IRS Claim Denial without Receipt September 5, 2019 105. IRS Claim Denial with Receipt September 5, 2019 responses to be read evidence; foundation Defendant USA herein Relevance; reserve all objections prejudicial; pending notice of particular Hearsay; best responses to be read evidence; foundation Defendant USA herein Relevance; reserve all objections prejudicial; pending notice of particular Hearsay; best responses to be read evidence; foundation Defendant USA herein Relevance; reserve all objections prejudicial; pending notice of particular Hearsay; best responses to be read evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Hearsay; best evidence; foundation (No Bates Number Provided) Relevance; foundation; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Relevance; foundation; best evidence; prejudicial; authenticity foundation; best evidence; authenticity Prejudicial; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; Relevance; foundation prejudicial; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Relevance; foundation prejudicial; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; Relevance; foundation prejudicial; 8 Case Case 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK 2:18-cv-01241-JCM-NJK Document Document 124 122-5Filed Filed 05/20/22 05/11/22Page Page 659ofof65 9 1 106. Government Pictures and Wilson Claim Information Relevance; prejudicial; foundation 107. IRS Denying Claim for Damages October 6, 2016 Relevance; prejudicial; foundation 5 108. Nakia McCloud Driver License 6 109. IRS Vehicle Information Relevance; foundation; best evidence; authenticity Relevance; prejudicial; foundation 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 9 foundation Relevance; prejudicial; foundation Relevance; prejudicial; foundation
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
