Snow v. Dzurenda et al, No. 2:2017cv02819 - Document 16 (D. Nev. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Snow need not pay an initial installment fee, prepay fees or costs, or provide security for fees or costs, but he is still required to pay the full $350 filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 even though this case is being dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Nevada Department of Corrections must pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month' s deposits to the account of John Oliver Snow, #19598 (in months that the account exceeds $10.00) until the full $350 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk is directed to SEND a copy of this order to the attention of Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Prisons, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV 89702.The 22 Third Amended Complaint is the operative Complaint and is DISMISSED in it's entirety. Clerk of Court directed to enter Judgment and close this case. Any IFP appeal would not be taken "in good faith". Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF with 2 copies to NDOC - DRS) Modified on 4/15/2020 (DRS).

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Order Screening Third-Amended Complaint and Dismissing Case in forma pauperis I. Snow v. Dzurenda et al See Screening standard Doc. 16 sua sponte pro se See See Neitzke v. Williams see also McKeever v. Block See Morley v. Walker See Warshaw v. Xoma Corp. Hughes v. Rowe Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly Ashcroft v. Iqbal Id see also Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t II. Id. Id Id. Id. Id Id Id Id Screening Snow’s Third Amended Complaint Id Id See Conclusion in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1 ] is GRANTED John Oliver Snow, #19598 Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Prisons, this case is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice in forma pauperis

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.