Rodriguez et al v. Pacific Life Insurance Company et al, No. 2:2012cv02071 - Document 52 (D. Nev. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER Granting 49 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice and Final Judgment as to Defendant Pacific Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/29/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Download PDF
Rodriguez et al v. Pacific Life Insurance Company et al Doc. 52 MORRIS LAW GROUP Robert McCoy, Bar No. 9121 Email: rrm@morrislawgroup.com Jean Paul Hendricks, Bar No. 10079 Email: jph@morrislawgroup.com 900 Bank of America Plaza 300 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 474-9400 Facsimile: (702) 474-9422 WELLS MARBLE & HURST, PLLC. Walter D. Willson, (pro hac vice) Kenna L. Mansfield, Jr. (pro hac vice) Joshua P. Henry, (pro hac vice) 300 Concourse Boulevard, Suite 200 Ridgeland, Mississippi 39157 Telephone: (601) 605-6900 Facsimile: (601) 605-6901 Attorneys for Defendant Pacific Life Insurance Company UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA DR. BENJAMIN RODRIGUEZ, BENJAMIN RODRIGUEZ, M.D., P.C., ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY; KENNETH R. ) HARSTEIN; ECONOMIC ) CONCEPTS, INC., and CRAIG ) BILLINGS, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) CASE NO: 2:12-cv-02071-APG-VCF ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant Pacific Life Insurance Company (“Pacific Life”) have jointly moved the Court for an Order dismissing Pacific Life from this matter with Dockets.Justia.com prejudice [49], and the Court, having been advised that Plaintiffs and Defendant Pacific Life have reached settlement with respect to all of the claims and causes of action asserted against Pacific Life herein, the Court finds as follows: There is no just reason for delay. Final judgment should be, and hereby is, entered as to Defendant Pacific Life pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, fully and finally dismissing and discharging it from this action with prejudice. Plaintiffs and Defendant Pacific Life to bear their own costs. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, under and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, Defendant Pacific Life Insurance Company is hereby fully and finally dismissed and discharged from this action with prejudice. Plaintiffs and Defendant Pacific Life to bear their own costs. 29th day of of ________, SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the ____ day May, 2013. 2013. . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE SUBMITTED AND AGREED TO BY: WELLS MARBLE & HURST, PLLC By: /s/ Joshua P. Henry Joshua P. Henry (pro hac vice) THORNDAL, ARMSTRONG, DELK, BALKENBUSH & EISINGER By: /s/ Brian K. Terry Brian K. Terry, Bar No.: 003171 Thorndal, Armstrong, Delk, Balkenbush & Eisinger 1100 E. Bridger Avenue P.O. Drawer 2070 Las Vegas, Nevada 89125-2070 MORRIS LAW GROUP Robert McCoy, Bar No. 9121 JP Hendricks, Bar No. 10079 900 Bank of America Plaza 300 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 WELLS MARBLE & HURST, PLLC Jonathan David Azano (pro se) Anthony L. Vitullo (pro se) Page 2 of 3 Walter D. Wilson (pro hac vice) Kenna Mansfield, Jr. (pro hac vice) 300 Concourse Boulevard, Suite 200 Ridgeland, MS 39157 300 Concourse Boulevard, Suite 200 Ridgeland, MS 39157 Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP 13155 Noel Road, Suite 1000 Dallas, Texas 75240 Attorney for Plaintiffs Dr. Benjamin Rodriguez and Benjamin Rodriguez M.D., P.C Attorneys for Defendant Pacific Life Insurance Company Page 3 of 3