Tillemans v. Astrue, No. 2:2012cv00127 - Document 29 (D. Nev. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER Affirming 23 Report and Recommendation and Overruling 27 Plaintiffs Exceptions to Magistrates Findings and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 9 Plaintiffs Motion for Reversal is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 16 Defendants Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 01/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
Download PDF
Tillemans v. Astrue Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 9 KATHERENE C. TILLEMANS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 14 Defendant. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-CV-00127-PMP-GWF ORDER On November 20, 2012, the Honorable Robert J. Johnston, United States 16 17 Magistrate Judge, entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #23) recommending 18 denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal (Doc. #9) and granting of Defendant’s 19 Cross-Motion to Affirm the Decision of the March 8, 2010 Administrative Law 20 Judge James S. Carletti which was affirmed by the Appeals Council of the Social 21 Security Administration on December 2, 2011. On January 7, 2013, Plaintiff filed Exceptions to the Magistrate’s Findings 22 23 and Recommendations (Doc. #27). The Court has conducted a de novo review of 24 the proceedings above, and finds that the Report and Recommendations of the 25 United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #23) should be affirmed. 26 /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Exceptions to 2 Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. #27) are OVERRULED and the 3 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston 4 (Doc. #23) is hereby AFFIRMED. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal (Doc. #9) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (Doc. #16) is GRANTED. DATED this 28th day of January, 2013. 10 11 12 13 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2