JS Products, Inc. v. Kabo Tool Company, No. 2:2011cv01856 - Document 375 (D. Nev. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff JS Products, Inc. and against Defendants Kabo Tool Company and Chih-Ching Hsieh on JSP's claim for declaratory judgment of patent invalidity, and in favor of JSP on Defendants' counterclaim for patent i nfringement. Defendants shall take nothing by way of their counterclaim. All remaining claims and defenses are hereby dismissed withoutprejudice as moot. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/9/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Download PDF
JS Products, Inc. v. Kabo Tool Company 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Doc. 375 R. Scott Weide (Nevada Bar No. 5541) sweide@weidemiller.com Ryan Gile (Nevada Bar No. 8807) rgile@weidemiller.com WEIDE &MILLER, LTD. 7251 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 530 Las Vegas, NV 89128-8373 Tel. (702) 382-4804 Fax (702) 382-4805 John B. Sganga, Jr. (admitted pro hac vice) John.sganga@knobbe.com Joshua Stowell (admitted pro hac vice) Joshua.stowell@knobbe.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 2040 Main Street, Suite 1400 Irvine, CA 92614 Tel. (949) 760-0404 Fax (949) 760-9502 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant JS PRODUCTS, INC 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 18 JS PRODUCTS, INC. 19 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 KABO TOOL COMPANY; CHIHCHING HSIEH; JOHN DOE ENTITIES I-X; AND JOHN DOES XI-XX Defendant/Counterclaimant. ) Case No. 2:11-CV-01856-RCJ-GWF ) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having granted the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent 2 Invalidity filed by Plaintiff JS Products, Inc.’s (“JSP”), final judgment in favor 3 of JSP is therefore appropriate. 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 5 (1) The only causes of actions to be adjudicated in this action are 6 Plaintiff 7 Noninfringement and Invalidity/Unenforceability of the ’057 8 Patent [Dkt. # 34] and Defendants Kabo Tool Company’s first 9 counterclaim for Patent Infringement [Dkt. # 37]. 10 (2) JSP’s first claim for Declaratory Judgment of For all of the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order [Dkt. #373] 11 dated July 28, 2014, Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 7,066,057 (“’057 12 patent”), the only patent claim alleged to be infringed by 13 Defendants in the above-captioned action, is declared invalid 14 because each limitation in the patent claim was anticipated by the 15 prior art. 16 (3) Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff JSP and 17 against Defendants Kabo Tool Company and Chih-Ching Hsieh on 18 JSP’s claim for declaratory judgment of patent invalidity, and in 19 favor of JSP on Defendants’ counterclaim for patent infringement. 20 Defendants shall take nothing by way of their counterclaim. 21 22 (4) All remaining claims and defenses are hereby dismissed without prejudice as moot. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED 25 26 27 Dated: September 9, 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 -1- Case no. 11-cv-01856 RCJ-GWF