Federal Trade Commission v. Ivy Capital, Inc. et al, No. 2:2011cv00283 - Document 446 (D. Nev. 2016)

Court Description: AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Final Monetary Judgment against Relief Defendant Leanne Hoskins is hereby amended and a monetary Judgment for $1,550,848.48 is entered in favor of the Federal Trade Commission and against relief defendant Leanne Hoskins. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF

Federal Trade Commission v. Ivy Capital, Inc. et al Doc. 446 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 IVY CAPITAL, INC., et al., 8 Defendants, and 9 10 11 CHERRYTREE HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Relief Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11-cv-00283-JCM -GWF NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDED FINAL MONETARY JUDGMENT ONLY AS TO RELIEF DEFENDANT LEANNE HOSKINS 12 13 Please take notice that Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission is filing the attached Proposed 14 Amended Final Monetary Judgment as to Relief Defendant Leanne Hoskins (Attachment A), 15 pursuant to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s October 5, 2015 16 memorandum order (docket number 441). Also attached is the December 30, 2015 Declaration 17 of Dr. Kenneth H. Kelly (Attachment B) regarding the Proposed Amended Final Monetary 18 Judgment and applicable prejudgment interest. 19 20 Dated: December 31, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 /s/ Shameka L. Walker SHAMEKA L. WALKER Attorney for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mailstop CC-8232 Washington, D.C. 20580 Phone: 202-326-2570 Fax: 202-326-3392 E-mail: swalker@ftc.gov Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on December 31, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document 3 with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all 4 counsel of record. 5 /s/ Shameka L. Walker Shameka L. Walker 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 ATTACHMENT A 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. IVY CAPITAL, INC., et al., Defendants, and CHERRYTREE HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Relief Defendants. Case No. 2:11-cv-00283-JCM -GWF [PROPOSED] AMENDED FINAL MONETARY JUDGMENT AS TO RELIEF DEFENDANT LEANNE HOSKINS On July 5, 2013, the court entered a Final Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Relief (docket number 409) in the amount of $1,128,795.78, plus prejudgment interest against relief defendant Leanne Hoskins and $1,529,292.25, plus prejudgment interest against relief defendant Oxford Financial, LLC. On October 5, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion (docket number 441) affirming in part, vacating in part, and remanding the judgment of this court as to relief defendant Leanne Hoskins. The Ninth Circuit instructed this court to alter the judgment against Ms. Hoskins to hold her jointly and severally liable with Oxford Financial, LLC for $1,529,292.52, plus prejudgment interest. Accordingly, the amended judgment against relief defendant Leanne Hoskins includes $1,529,292.52 in equitable monetary relief and $21,555.96 in prejudgment interest, which together total $1,550,848.48. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the final monetary judgment against relief defendant Leanne Hoskins is hereby amended and a monetary judgment for 2 1 $1,550,848.48 is entered in favor of the Federal Trade Commission and against relief defendant 2 Leanne Hoskins. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 ________________________________ 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 January 6, 2016 DATED: ________________________ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 1 of 16 ATTACHMENT B Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 2 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 3 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 4 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 5 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 6 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 7 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 8 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 9 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 10 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 11 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 12 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 13 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 14 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 15 of 16 Case 2:11-cv-00283-JCM-GWF Document 445-2 Filed 12/31/15 Page 16 of 16

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.