-RJJ Munoz v Skolnik et al, No. 2:2010cv01564 - Document 12 (D. Nev. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond. M. Adams answer due 6/6/2011; C. Burson answer due 6/6/2011; L. Green answer due 6/6/2011; T. Hill answer due 6/6/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 4/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
-RJJ Munoz v Skolnik et al Doc. 12 !"#$ %%&' % ( ) &' % & &*& +++ , *(& * 1 - *. 1 !02#2 3 45#$6 7!"8/7$# 93 45#$6 7!"8/55/ : ; . /0## & &%%. , . % * 9 4( & % . . = % *>6. ) 49 ) @; * ( "4)6. !24'6. 1 & -* %& ) ? 8 % ( B A &*?&** D* %%&' ; . ' . < . . 9 ? '( 8 :: * . - & * ' (&* & * 9 & &* ) -( * ( & & *. 9 ( * & ' * & ( "82. ( A& ( ( $32#8' 8#2+"78 . * )?& & &%% %& * ' ?? % -( % '% 6& < ( % ( . ( * 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 .: . '& &B ) 4 % C!6 B &* ( 9 ) 22. $#22. ?& - ( '( 2. $#22. (&* &B % ? * & A& (& 4 C06 $2 *' ( * A( ( ( * * ) ( &' ' ) Dockets.Justia.com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pril 19, 2011 3 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM> & %% ? * %& 8%& 47+6 . & -. ( ( ) ' &% ( ? ( 2! ( ( ? % % ( % ) %& ' ' ' A& ( ( ( * 1 - *. : , //#2 ) . ; ** .: *& - ( & ( ( % ? & *& 9* * ? % ' ) ' &' *. % A& -3 ML*L ? L - & - C07"#+ + N 5##5 <. # % B % ( ' . ( % & . $#22. * ) ( % # 1 !05#$ " % ( MMMMMMMM %%&' % ( %%&' ' ' *& ? && - %

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.