Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas Inc, No. 2:2008cv00886 - Document 308 (D. Nev. 2015)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 11/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas Inc Doc. 308 Case 2:08-cv-00886-LDG-GWF Document 306-1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) 800 IDEAS, INC. AND ) SUSAN PARKER, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________ ) JERALD ALAN HAMMANN, Case No.: 2:08-cv-00886 (PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT 10 11 12 This is an action for alleged violations of various FCC regulations, certain anti-trust claims and common law claims brought by plaintiff Jerald Hammann (“Plaintiff’) against defendants 13 800 Ideas, Inc. and Susan Parker arising out of Plaintiff’s failed efforts to obtain two vanity toll 14 free telephone numbers (the “Disputed Numbers”). By way of Order entered on September 17, 15 2015 (Dkt. No. 301), this Court granted Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment 16 and allowed Plaintiff to submit authorities in support of his equitable claim for recovery of the 17 Disputed Numbers from a third party. On October 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Memorandum of 18 19 Law in support of his claim for equitable relief (Dkt. No. 305). On November 17, 2015, 20 Defendants filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law requesting that this Court grant 21 Plaintiff’s request for transfer of the Disputed Numbers and that this Court enter final judgment 22 in this matter dismissing with prejudice all claims against Defendants (Dkt. No. 306). For the 23 reasons set forth in the September 17, 2015 Order, 24 IT IS on this 20th day of ______ 2015 ___ Nov. 25 ORDERED as follows: 26 27 28 29 30 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:08-cv-00886-LDG-GWF Document 306-1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 2 of 2 1 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s claims of 2 3 4 5 alleged violations of FCC regulations in Counts One through Four and Counts Seven and Eight of the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 217, pp. 8-11, 13-14); 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s claims of 6 alleged violations of the Sherman Act in Counts Five and Six of the Second Amended Complaint 7 (Dkt. No. 217, pp. 11-13); 8 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s Nevada State 9 common law claims in Counts Nine through Eleven of the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 10 11 12 13 14 15 No. 217, pp. 14-15); 4. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff dismissing with prejudice the Second Amended Complaint in its entirety; 5. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff for his claim for equitable relief and Plaintiff is hereby granted the right of subscribership to the Disputed Numbers. 16 Accordingly, this matter is CLOSED. 17 18 _______________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
