George v. Morton, et al, No. 2:2006cv01112 - Document 143 (D. Nev. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER REGARDING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; The 142 Findings and Recommendation are Affirmed. The 85 Answer of Defendants IDM Properties, LP; IDM Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM Investments 1, LP; and IDM Investments 2, LP are hereby Stricken a nd Default is entered in favor of Plaintiff Patrick George, and against said Defendants for the failure of said Defendants to comply with the Order of the Court to obtain counsel. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 02/05/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SRK)

Download PDF
George v. Morton, et al Doc. 143 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 *** 10 PATRICK GEORGE, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 vs. 14 PETER A. MORTON, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:06-CV-01112- PMP-GWF ORDER Before the Court for consideration is the Honorable George W. Foley 18 United States Magistrate Judge’s, Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #142) 19 entered January 22, 2009, recommending that Defendants IDM Properties, LP; IDM 20 Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM Investments 1, LP; and IDM Investments 2, LP’s 21 Answer should be stricken and their default entered based on Defendants’ failure to 22 comply with this Court’s Order to obtain counsel. 23 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in 24 accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and 25 determines that Magistrate Judge Foley’s Report of Findings and Recommendation 26 should be Affirmed. Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Answer of Defendants IDM 2 Properties, LP; IDM Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM Investments 1, LP; and IDM 3 Investments 2, LP are hereby stricken and default is entered in favor of Plaintiff 4 Patrick George, and against said Defendants for the failure of said Defendants to 5 comply with the Order of the Court to obtain counsel. 6 7 DATED: February 5, 2009. 8 9 10 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.