George v. Morton, et al, No. 2:2006cv01112 - Document 142 (D. Nev. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Defendants IDM Properties, LLP; IDM Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM Investments 1, LP and IDM Investments 2, LP, c/o Christopher Milam, International Development Manage ment, 3980 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste. 150, Las Vegas, NV 89169. It is RECOMMENDED that the 85 Answer of Defendants IDM Properties, LP; IDM Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM Investments 1, LP; and IDM Investments 2, LP be stricken and their default entered based on Defendants failure to comply with this Courts Order to obtain counsel. Objections to R&R due by 2/2/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge George W Foley, Jr on 01/22/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SRK)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
George v. Morton, et al Doc. 142 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 PATRICK GEORGE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PETER A. MORTON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:06-cv-01112-PMP-GWF FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER 12 13 This matter is before the Court on the Order to Show Cause (#141), filed January 7, 2009, 14 wherein this Court ordered Defendants IDM Properties, LP; IDM Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM 15 Investments 1, LP; and IDM Investments 2, LP to show cause, in writing, no later than January 16, 16 2009, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with this Court’s prior order 17 (#134) to retain new counsel. To date, Defendants IDM Properties, LP; IDM Properties (Nevada), 18 LLC; IDM Investments 1, LP; and IDM Investments 2, LP have failed to comply. Accordingly, 19 RECOMMENDATION 20 IT IS RECOMMENDED by the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge that the Answer 21 of Defendants IDM Properties, LP; IDM Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM Investments 1, LP; and IDM 22 Investments 2, LP should be stricken and their default entered based on Defendants’ failure to comply 23 with this Court’s Order to obtain counsel. 24 25 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order and 26 Findings & Recommendation to Defendants IDM Properties, LP; IDM Properties (Nevada), LLC; IDM 27 Investments 1, LP; and IDM Investments 2, LP, c/o Christopher Milam, International Development 28 Management, 3980 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 150, Las Vegas, NV 89169. Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 NOTICE Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2, any objection to this Finding and Recommendation must be in 3 writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within ten (10) days. The Supreme Court has held that the 4 courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections 5 within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) 6 failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the 7 objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order and/or appeal factual issues 8 from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi 9 Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 10 DATED this 22nd day of January, 2009. 11 12 13 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
