Anaya et al v. Kleine et al, No. 4:2007cv03254 - Document 62 (D. Neb. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER regarding motions. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Filing 55 , the parties' joint stipulation to dismiss the plaintiffs' action, with prejudice, as against three of the defendants, Christine Peterson, Krystal Baumer, and Julie Miller, is granted. There being no just reason for delay, a final judgment shall be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) by separate document. 2. Filing 47 , the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants Christine Peterson, Krystal Baumer , and Julie Miller is denied without prejudice, as moot. 3. Filing 60 , the remaining defendants motion to strike the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment (filing 56 ), index of evidence (filing 57 ), and brief (filing 58 ), and to stay proceedings, is denied. 4. The defendants shall have until November 4, 2008, to respond to the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKL)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Anaya et al v. Kleine et al Doc. 62 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARY and JOSUE ANAYA, individually and as next friends of JOEL EZEKIEL ANAYA, Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTINE PETERSON, in her individual and official capacity as Director of the Department of Health and Human Services, JULIE MILLER, in her individual and official capacity as Coordinator of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services Newborn Screening Program, KRYSTAL BAUMERT, in her individual and official capacity as Follow-Up Coordinator, Newborn Screening Program, DON KLEINE, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, and NICOLE GOALEY, in her individual and official capacity as an Assistant Douglas County Attorney, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:07CV3254 ORDER Defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Filing 55, the parties’ joint stipulation to dismiss the plaintiffs’ action, with prejudice, as against three of the defendants, Christine Peterson, Krystal Baumer, and Julie Miller, is granted. There being no just Dockets.Justia.com reason for delay, a final judgment shall be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) by separate document. 2. Filing 47, the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants Christine Peterson, Krystal Baumer, and Julie Miller is denied without prejudice, as moot. 3. Filing 60, the remaining defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment (filing 56), index of evidence (filing 57), and brief (filing 58), and to stay proceedings, is denied. 4. The defendants shall have until November 4, 2008, to respond to the plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment. DATED this 15th day of October, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
