Travel Gig, LLC et al v. Sharing Services Global Corporation et al, No. 9:2022cv00146 - Document 50 (D. Mont. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs must deposit a bond of $100,000 with the Clerk of Court within 5 business days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 48 Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 12/8/2022. (NOS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Travel Gig, LLC et al v. Sharing Services Global Corporation et al Doc. 50 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 1 of 22 Dockets.Justia.com Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 2 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 3 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 4 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 5 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 6 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 7 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 8 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 9 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 10 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 11 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 12 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 13 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 14 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 15 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 16 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 17 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 18 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 19 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 20 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 21 of 22 Case 9:22-cv-00146-DWM Document 50 Filed 12/08/22 Page 22 of 22 3()3 @ )6",.5@*13@9)@2"?/)06@1*@9)@&10(@/"?@&)@(,5';55)(@>,9@9)@ .)3-@1*@ 1< @ @ @ @ @9"6@ )*)0(%65@ 18,10@*13@ )"=)@61@ ,.)@"@ 16,10@*13@ )'105,()3"6,10@,5@ @ 1' @ @ @9,5@ 6H ("?@1* )')/&)3 @ @ 1 10$(@ @ 1.. .1? @ 10$(@ @ 1..1? @ ,5:,'6@ ;(+)@ 0,6)(@ 6#7)5@ ,5:,'8@ 1;4@ 0,6)( (@ 6#7)5@ ,,5:,,' @
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
