Raskiewicz v. United States, No. 9:2014cv00259 - Document 4 (D. Mont. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 in full. Raskiewicz's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/31/2014. Mailed to Raskiewicz. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Raskiewicz v. United States Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION JEREMY RASKIEWICZ, CV 14-259-M-DLC Plaintiff, ORDER vs. UNITED STATES, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah Lynch entered his Findings and Recommendation on October 23,2014, recommending denial ofRaskiewicz's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Judge Lynch recommends denial based on his findings that Raskiewicz's application is insufficient due to his failure to file a copy of his inmate trust account statement as required by 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(2) and that Raskiewicz's allegations are frivolous. Tripati v. First Nat 'I Bank & Trust, 821 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1987). "A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit." Id. At 1370. Raskiewicz is not entitled to a ten-day period to object. See Minetti v. Port o/Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). The Court adopts Judge Lynch's Dockets.Justia.com Findings and Recommendation in full. Raskiewicz alleges that he is exempt from incarceration because he has a United States Army permanent contract with the Central Intelligence Agency component. This claim does not raise any statutory or constitutional authority on which relief may be granted. Raskiewicz has a history of filing repetitive, frivolous lawsuits. It appears from the face of the proposed Complaint that this action is also frivolous. IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 3) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Raskiewicz's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. This case's CLOSED. Dated this -;\ stay of October, 20 . Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
