Rogers v. Deputy King et al, No. 9:2013cv00163 - Document 13 (D. Mont. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 in full. Rogers'claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to all defendants. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/4/2013. Mailed to Rogers. (TAG, )

Download PDF
Rogers v. Deputy King et al Doc. 13 FILED OCTO ~ 2013 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION DONALD P. ROGERS, Cletf( us' n;':..:;· . O'8tHe' ...,~ct. Of Mot MISSoula 'f' CV I3-163-M-DWM-JCL Plaintiff, ORDER vs. DEPUTY KING, DEPUTY BURT, ASS. DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY JASON TROY MARKS, CHIEF COUNTY ATTORNEY FRED VAN V ALKENBURG, CITY OF MISSOULA JUDICIAL COURT SYSTEM, and the COUNTY OF MISSOlJLA, Defendants. Donald Rogers is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. He brings an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging his Federal Constitutional rights were violated during the course of a criminal proceeding prosecuted against him by the State of Montana. Magistrate Judge Lynch recommends this Court dismiss Rogers' claims for injunctive and declaratory relief as to all defendants. (Doc. 11). Rogers has not filed objections to Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation. The Court reviews the findings and recommendations that are 1 Dockets.Justia.com not specifically objected to for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309,1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no clear error with Judge Lynch's determination that Rogers' claims for injunctive and declaratory relief should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation (doc. 11) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Donald Rogers' claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to all defendants. Dated this ~ay of October 2013. o loy, District Judge United Stat s .strict Court 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.