Baggett v. Travelers et al, No. 9:2010cv00090 - Document 11 (D. Mont. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Findings and Recommendations. Defendant's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/12/2011. (APP, ) Copy mailed to Baggett this date.
Download PDF
Baggett v. Travelers et al Doc. 11 FILED JAN 12 2011 PAmlCK E. DUFFY, CLERK By­... DEPUTY CleRK", ='S=SOUI.A:O­­M IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ALLEN BAGGETT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. TRAVELERS, B&B AUTO TIRE AND TOWING, CHARTER OAK, AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, MONTANA STATE INSURANCE AUDITOR, AAA MOUNTAIN WEST, AAA OREGON/ IDAHO, Defendants. CV 10-90-M-DWM-JCL ORDER -----------------------) United States Magistrate Judge Lynch entered Findings and Recommendation in this matter on November 29,2010. Judge Lynch recommended the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of ­1- Dockets.Justia.com Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff did not timely object to the Findings and Recommendation and has therefore waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court will review the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore BlIs. Mach .. Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). Plaintiff Allen Baggett filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis under authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(l), and he lodged a proposed Complaint on August 19, 2010. After receiving two denials on his request to file in forma pauperis, on September 30, 2010 Baggett filed a motion to amend his in forma pauperis motion. October 5, 2010 the Court granted Baggett's motion to amend his in forma pauperis motion. The Order also instructed him to provide specific financial information needed to support his amended motion. By November 8, 2010 Bagget had not filed his amended motion. The Court directed Plaintiff to file his amended motion by November 22, 2010, and warned that his case would be closed if he did not comply with the order. Plaintiff did not comply with the order. -2- After a review of Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation, I find no clear error. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation (dkt #10) are adopted in full. Baggett's Complaint (dkt #2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). . Dated this '-- of January, 2011. day / -3- /