Newberry v. State of Montana et al, No. 6:2019cv00050 - Document 8 (D. Mont. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants State of Montana and Bill Weddington DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/11/2020. Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to Plaintiff. (TAG)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Newberry v. State of Montana et al Doc. 8 Case 6:19-cv-00050-DLC-JTJ Document 8 Filed 05/11/20 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION JASON NEWBERRY, CV 19–50–H–DLC–JTJ Plaintiff, vs. ORDER CINDY HINER, CONNIE WINNER, DR. REESE, DR. HURST, WARDEN LYNN GUYER, BILL WEDDINGTON, and REGIOND MICHAELS, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered an Order and Findings and Recommendations on April 7, 2020, recommending that the Court dismiss Defendants State of Montana and Bill Weddington from this action. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff Jason Newberry failed to timely object to the Findings and Recommendations, and so waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–53 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Wash. Mut., Inc. v. United States, 856 F.3d 711, 721 (9th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). -1- Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:19-cv-00050-DLC-JTJ Document 8 Filed 05/11/20 Page 2 of 3 Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 7), the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston’s recommendation that the State of Montana be dismissed from this action. Although Newberry named the State when he opened this case (Doc. 1), he did not do so in his Amended Complaint (Doc. 6). An amended complaint supersedes previous versions, and the State therefore must be dismissed. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). The Court will also adopt Judge Johnston’s recommendation to dismiss Defendant Weddington. Judge Johnston did not clearly err in determining that Newberry failed to allege that Weddington violated a federally protected right when he alleged only that Weddington failed to follow appropriate procedures for considering complaints under the Prison Rape Elimination Act. See Porter v. Jennings, No. 1:10-cv-1811-AW-DLB PC, 2012 WL 1434986, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED; and (2) Defendants State of Montana and Bill Weddington are DISMISSED from this action. -2- Case 6:19-cv-00050-DLC-JTJ Document 8 Filed 05/11/20 Page 3 of 3 DATED this 11th day of May, 2020. -3-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
