Holm v. Beaver, No. 6:2018cv00081 - Document 23 (D. Mont. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Findings and Recommendations 21 adopted in full. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/3/2020. (TAG)

Download PDF
Holm v. Beaver Doc. 23 Case 6:18-cv-00081-DLC Document 23 Filed 08/03/20 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION BRIAN HOLM, CV 18–81–H–DLC Plaintiff, vs. ORDER CRYSTAL BEAVER, P.R. FOR THE ESTATE OF BRIAN BEAVER, HER HEIRS, EXECUTORS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, Defendants. Before the Court is the Findings & Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston. (Doc. 21.) Judge Johnston recommends dismissing this matter without prejudice. No party or nonparty representative objects. Absent objection, the Court reviews Judge Johnston’s findings and recommendation for clear error. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error is “significantly deferential” and exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). -1- Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:18-cv-00081-DLC Document 23 Filed 08/03/20 Page 2 of 3 The Court finds no clear error here. Judge Johnston bases his recommendation on Mr. Holm’s failure to serve Defendant Beaver after she refused to waive service. As Judge Johnston notes, an in forma pauperis plaintiff must request that the United States Marshals Service serve his complaint to impute the responsibility of service to the U.S. Marshals. Boudette v. Barnette, 923 F.2d 754, 757 (9th Cir. 1991). Nothing in the record suggests that Mr. Holm made such a request. Therefore, because Mr. Holm failed to serve Defendant Beaver pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the Court agrees that dismissal without prejudice is proper. Additionally, the Court notes that Mr. Holm has passed away. (Doc. 21 at 3.) The record is devoid of information as to the existence of nonparty representatives who may have an interest in substituting for Mr. Holm in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a). The Court agrees with Judge Johnston’s assessment that Mr. Holm’s death, coupled with his failure to serve any defendant before he died, leaves dismissal without prejudice as the Court’s only option. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 21) IN FULL. Consequently, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. -2- Case 6:18-cv-00081-DLC Document 23 Filed 08/03/20 Page 3 of 3 DATED this 3rd day of August, 2020. -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.