Davis v. Fletcher, No. 6:2018cv00016 - Document 24 (D. Mont. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 in full. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 7/23/2018. Mailed to Davis (TAG)

Download PDF
Davis v. Fletcher Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION RORY DAVIS, CV-18-16-H-BMM-JTJ Petitioner, vs. ORDER MICHAEL FLETCHER, Respondent. United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered his Amended Findings and Recommendations in this case on April 18, 2018, recommending dismissal of Petitioner Rory Davis’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 19.) Neither party filed objections. When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1986). This Court will review Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations, however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Judge Johnston found, and this Court agrees, that this matter should be dismissed because Davis has not filed an individual petition for habeas corpus 1 Dockets.Justia.com relief as directed. Davis is precluded from filing his request for habeas relief en masse with other petitioners. Thus, his petition will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court has reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations for clear error. The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations, and adopts them in full. IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 19), are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS ORDERED that Davis’s Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. DATED this 23rd day of July, 2018. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.