Wilson v. Second Judicial Court et al, No. 6:2016cv00079 - Document 20 (D. Mont. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full ; denying 4 Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Petition Denied as moot. Copy mailed to Wilson. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 11/22/2016. (HEG, )

Download PDF
Wilson v. Second Judicial Court et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION CV 16-79-H-DLC-JTJ RAY DEAN WILSON, Petitioner, ORDER vs. SECOND JUDICIAL COURT, VIRGINIA HILL, et al., Respondents. United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Order, Findings and Recommendations in this matter on October 24, 2016, recommending denial of Petitioner Ray Dean Wilson's motion for summary judgment and his application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The parties failed to timely object to the Findings and Recommendations, and so waived their right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been -1- Dockets.Justia.com committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendations, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's conclusion that Wilson's motion for summary judgment and his habeas petition should be denied as moot. The basis for these motions was Wilson's involuntary commitment to the Montana State Hospital. Wilson, however, has been released from the Montana State Hospital. Thus, his claim that the facility is restraining his freedom is now moot. Accordingly, there being no clear error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 16) are ADOPTED IN FULL. (2) Wilson's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 4) is DENIED. (3) Wilson's petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED as moot. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter, by separate document, a judgment of dismissal. (4) A certificate of appealability is DENIED. -2- Dated this l.2~ay ofNovember, 2016 Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.