Lozeau v. McTighe et al, No. 4:2019cv00069 - Document 41 (D. Mont. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 40 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Complaint DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or comply with the Court's orders. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 7/21/2021. Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to Plaintiff. (TAG)

Download PDF
Lozeau v. McTighe et al Doc. 41 Case 4:19-cv-00069-BMM Document 41 Filed 07/21/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION HARRY PAUL LOZEAU, CV 19-88-GF-BMM-JTJ Plaintiff, vs. ORDER MR. MCTIGHE, MS. POWELL, MR. MADRID, MS. ALSTEAD, MR. MONTGOMERY, HARLON TROMBLEY, MR. BERKEBILE, MR. DELELLA, MS. NELSON, MS. VINES, MR. JOHNSON, MR. MORHARD, and MR. WIRSCHING, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on July 6, 2021. (Doc. 40). Judge Johnston recommended that Lozeau’s complaint should be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or comply with the Court’s orders, that the Clerk of Court should be directed to close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that the Clerk of Court should be directed to have the docket reflect that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. -1 - Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:19-cv-00069-BMM Document 41 Filed 07/21/21 Page 2 of 2 Neither party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The parties have waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 40) are ADOPTED IN FULL. DATED this 21st day of July, 2021. -2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.