Filler v. United Parcel Service, No. 4:2019cv00061 - Document 33 (D. Mont. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER; Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations 22 are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss 6 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 3/2/2020. (TLO)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Filler v. United Parcel Service Doc. 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION ANTHONY FILLER, CV 19-61–BMM–JTJ Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on November 19, 2019 (Doc. 22.) Judge Johnston recommended that Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) be denied as moot. Neither party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The parties have waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none, -1 - Dockets.Justia.com IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 22) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT. DATED this 2nd day of March, 2020. -2 -
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
