Fourstar v. Kane et al, No. 4:2016cv00019 - Document 8 (D. Mont. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/6/2016. (SLL, ) Modified on 6/6/2016: mailed to Fourstar (TAG, ).

Download PDF
Fourstar v. Kane et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION CV 16-00019-GF-BMM VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR. Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RICHARD KANE, et al. Defendants. Plaintiff Victor Fourstar, Jr. filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 1), a proposed Complaint (Doc. 2), and several other motions including a motion for recusal of judges (Doc. 5). Fourstar is a federal inmate housed in the United States Penitentiary in Marianna, Florida. United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on May 17, 2016. (Doc. 6 at 5.) Judge Johnston has recommended that the Court deny Fourstar’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Id. Judge Johnston reserved 1 Dockets.Justia.com ruling on Fourstar’s “Motion for Recusal of Judges” as it did not pertain to Judge Johnston. (Doc. 6 at 1.) Fourstar filed no objections to Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations. When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1986). This Court will review Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations, however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court possesses discretion to grant a defendant permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28. U.S.C. §1915(a). A prisoner who “has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted” may not bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action, “unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious or physical injury.” Fourstar has exceeded the three “strikes” allowed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. He has filed at least three civil actions that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. Fourstar has not satisfied the imminent danger exception to section 1915(a). Andrews v. Cervantes, 493. F.3d 1047, 1055- 2 56 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations, and adopts them in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Fourstar’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is DENIED. DATED this 6th day of June, 2016. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.