Dethman v. Crossroads Correctional Facility, No. 4:2012cv00027 - Document 6 (D. Mont. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 in full. The 1 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, this dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g), and the Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/13/2012. Mailed to Dethman. (TAG, )

Download PDF
Dethman v. Crossroads Correctional Facility Doc. 6 FILED JUL 03 2012 PATRICK f. DUFFY, CLERK IIV rD'"EiitpuiTTYV.C;::;-Lo;!R~K--;, ""'Urr=eB IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION TRAVIS M. DETHMAN, Plaintiff, No. CV 12-27-GF-SEH vs. ORDER CROSSROADS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendant. On June 15,2012, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendations l in this matter. Plaintiff did not file objections. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 149-152 (1986). However, this 1 Docket No. 22. -J­ Dockets.Justia.com Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in fulL ORDERED: I. The Complaint2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The docket shall reflect the filing ofthis action constitutes one strike under 28 U.S.c. § 1915(g). 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith due to the frivolous nature of the issues raised. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment acc~rdingly. DATED this /3 d.. ofJuly, 2012. day 4~ United States District Judge 2 Docket No. 1. -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.