Anderson v. Kirkegard et al, No. 4:2012cv00005 - Document 8 (D. Mont. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 in full. The Petition 1 is DENIED on the MERITS, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 6/15/2012. Mailed to Anderson. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Anderson v. Kirkegard et al Doc. 8 I-!J I ... " ~ , , -v t), _ _ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION ROWDY D. ANDERSON, Petitioner, No. CV 12-5-GF-SEH vs. ORDER WARDEN LEROY KIRKEGARD; ATTORNEYGENERAL OF THE STATE OF MOTNANA, I Respondents. I On May 14,2012, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendation l in this matter. Petitioner did not file objections. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 149-152 (1986). However, this I Docket No.7. -1 Dockets.Justia.com Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in full. ORDERED: l. The Petition2 is DENIED on the MERITS. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Any appeal would be taken in bad faith as petitionerxs are without merit. DATED this /3 dayofJune,2012. United States District Judge 2 Docket No. 1. -2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
