McGee v. Astrue, No. 4:2011cv00063 - Document 23 (D. Mont. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 2) Defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/9/2012. (SLR, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McGee v. Astrue Doc. 23 ., , 20J2 JUL 8 PI~ 12" I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT p~ r, 1\ I ,. ,'; , r; - , ."j FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BY -"--" ');1) i.d ' - 1"-\/ "'" 0 ( .- !. 0 ~_ ~ F < '._,~_ rJ . . . r" r-' ;\ i .) , , -., ,_. ~~ GREAT FALLS DIVISION KORTNEY McGEE, Plaintiff, No. CV-1l-63-GF-SEH vs. ORDER MICHAEL J, ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, , Defendant. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations l on June 14,2012. Plaintiff filed objections on July 2, 2012. The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(I). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. I Document No, 21 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgmene is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment3 is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. DATED this /J-dt: of July, 2012. day ., United States District Judge 2 Document No. 14 3 Document No. 17
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
