Redfern v. Montana Department of Corrections, No. 4:2011cv00049 - Document 21 (D. Mont. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Defendants Janet Cox's and Sylvia Dubuisson's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Summary judgment as to Defendant Denise McNeeley is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 5 is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/18/2012. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Redfern v. Montana Department of Corrections Doc. 21 FI LE D 2012 APR 18 Pr'1 2 Y8 BY DEPUTY CLEfl,K IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION MARTIN MORRIS REDFERN, Plaintiff, No. CV 11-49-GF-SEH vs. ORDER JANET COX, DENISE McNEELEY, SYLVIA DUBUISSON, and DOES 1 10, Defendants. On March 30, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Reconunendation l in this matter. Plaintiff did not file objections. No review is required ofproposed findings and reconunendations to which no I Docket No. 20. ·1· Dockets.Justia.com objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140,149-152 (1986). However, this Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in fulL ORDERED: 1. Defendants Janet Cox's and Sylvia Dubuisson's Motion for Summary Judgmene is GRANTED. 2. Summary judgment as to Defendant Denise McNeeley is GRANTED as conceded by Plaintiff.3 2. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. 3. The Clerk of~rt is directed to enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 11 day of April, 2012. United States District Judge 2 Docket No.9. 3 Docket No. 17 at 1. -2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
