Vondal v. Frink et al, No. 4:2011cv00042 - Document 14 (D. Mont. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 in full. Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/14/2011. Mailed to Vondal. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Vondal v. Frink et al Doc. 14 Gil FILED ,.; ., 1011 SFP lLJ Prl 12 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT P,\TRIC~~ E, OJFFY, CLEfU~ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BY _________ DEPUTY CLERK GREAT FALLS DIVISION LAVERNE J. VONDAL, No. CV-1l42-GF-SEH Petitioner, vs. ORDER WARDEN MARTIN FRINK; ATIORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent. On August 29, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendation l in this matter. Plaintiff filed objections to Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation on September 12,2011.2 The Court has fully considered Plaintiff s motion and has reviewed de novo Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in full. I Document No. 12. 2 Document No. 13. -1 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 3 is DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred and as procedurally defaulted without excuse. 2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED as the matter is time-barred. 3. The Clerk is-tcted to enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 3 /1 day of September, 2011. Document No.1. -2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
