Cerovski v. Astrue, No. 4:2011cv00039 - Document 24 (D. Mont. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 1) Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2) Defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. 3) This matter is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for an award of benefits. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 3/13/2012. (SLR, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cerovski v. Astrue Doc. 24 FI LE D 2012 rlRR 13 APJ 10 09 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURWR.;CK ~. ~;0FFf. CLERK BY FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA '\~t L _ P""Y C'L,r::R~ '.'/. ,;\ GREAT FALLS DIVISION STEPHEN 1. CEROVSKI, Plaintiff, No. CV·1l·39·GF·SEH vs. ORDER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations on February 21,2012. 1 Defendant filed objections on March 9, 2012.2 The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. 1 Document No. 21 2 Document No. 22 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgmene is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment4 is DENIED. 3. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for an award of benefits. 4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 184,y of March, 2012. ~t:II~) ~~HADDON . United States District Judge 3 Document No. 13 4 Document No. 17 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
