Alexander v. Great Falls Transitional Services et al, No. 4:2011cv00032 - Document 8 (D. Mont. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 in full. The Complaint 2 is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 8/29/2011. Mailed to Alexander. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Alexander v. Great Falls Transitional Services et al Doc. 8 FIL.ED 2011 AUG 29 PrJ 1 06 8Y c,:PlJTY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION LEVI ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, No. CV ll-32-GF-SEH vs. ORDER MISSOULA PRERELEASE, Defendant. On August 3,2011, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendation l in this matter. Plaintiff did not file objections. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140,149-152 (1986). However, this Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. I Docket No.7. Dockets.Justia.com Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. The Complaint 2 is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a 2. The docket shall reflect the filing of this action constitutes one strike claim. under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith due to the frivolous nature of the issues raised. The Clerk is DATED this judgment accordingly. /19 day ofAugust, 20 II. 2 Docket No.2. E. HADDON United States District Judge \
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
