Adkins v. Mahoney et al, No. 4:2010cv00008 - Document 6 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 in full. The Petition 1 is DENIED on the merits. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/21/2010. Copy mailed to Adkins. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Adkins v. Mahoney et al Doc. 6 I1 ! r:- ;" ,. , -.J' ,,__ ,- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONT ANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION DA VID NEIL ADKINS, Petitioner, No. CV-IO-8-GF-SEH vs, ORDER MIKE MAHONEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent United States Magistrate Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations l on March 15,2010. Plaintiff filed objections on March 23, I Document No, 3. ·1· Dockets.Justia.com 2010 2 • The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendation to which objections are made. 28 U.S.c. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. Petitioner's Petition3 is DENIED on the merits. 2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment in favor of Respondents DATED this Petitioner. f)JJfayof April, 2010. United States District Judge lDocumentNo.4. 3Document No.1. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
