Boyd v. Fort Peck Tribes, No. 4:2009cv00084 - Document 4 (D. Mont. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 in full. Boyd's Petition 1 is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 10/27/2009. Copy mailed to Boyd. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Boyd v. Fort Peck Tribes Doc. 4 9109 OCT 27 PI1 1 53 i.:TZl:i: ; ;;FiY. . CLERK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DMSION ROBERTA BOYD, Petitioner, VS. I NO. CV 09-84-GF-SEH ORDER FORT PECK TRIBES, Respondent. On September 14,2009, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendation' in this matter. Petitioner did not file objections. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140,149-152 (1986). ' Docket No. 3. Dockets.Justia.com However, this Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. Upon review, I find no clear m o r in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus2is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Any appeal would be taken in bad faith as this Court lacksjubject matter jurisdiction. DATED this 7*% of October, 2009. day United States District Judge "ocket No. 1.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
