Keller v. Astrue, No. 4:2009cv00075 - Document 20 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jody L. Keller; 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael J. Astrue; and, 18 Findings and Recommendations: 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/20/2010. (SLR, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Keller v. Astrue Doc. 20 , 'in1 f.,-"J I' :. j "Ii.'PP { , , ?n ,-U , . :.'-:;,1 .... . 1 ,'1. ,- ." L. "1 ' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT r I 'E ·,,'L . . ,\ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION JODY L. KELLER, Plaintiff, No. CV-09-75-GF-SEH vs. ORDER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations' on April 14, 2010. Plaintiff filed objections on April 19, 2010. 2 The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. 1 Document No. 18 2 Document No. 19 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment3 is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment4 is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is DATED this to enter judgment accordingly. ').D --day of April, 2010. United States District Judge 3 Document No. 11 4 Document No. 14 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
