Young v. Correctional Corporation of America, No. 4:2009cv00022 - Document 22 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 21 in full. Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/14/2010. Copy mailed to Young. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Young v. Correctional Corporation of America Doc. 22 FILED APR 14 2010 PATRICK E. DUFFY, CLERK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION KENNETH PAUL YOUNG, Plaintiff, No. CV-09-22-GF-SEH vs. ORDER CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et aI., Defendant. On March 12,2010, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations! in this matter. Plaintiff did not file objections. No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 149-152 (1986). However, this Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations 1 Document No. 21. Dockets.Justia.com for clear error. Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in fulL ORDERED: 1. Defendants Corrections Corporation of America and Unit Manager Ronald Sturchio's Motion to Dismiss 2 is GRANTED. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust all administrative remedies. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Any appeal would be taken in bad faith as all DATED this remedies have not been exhausted. / 'I day of April, 20 IO. 2 United States District Judge Docket No. 12. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
