HUOT v. MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES et al, No. 2:2017cv00069 - Document 15 (D. Mont. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 13 Findings and Recommendations in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Huot's motion for a mistrial, construed as a Rule 60(b) motion, is DENIED as lacking any basis in fact or law. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 2/21/2018. (Copy mailed to Huot.) (NOS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
HUOT v. MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES et al IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION Doc. 15 FEB 2 1 2018 Cieri<, U"S el,s,,,",, Oistnct O~ :\4(;1'\';" " Gfe~) -~, SAFRON HUOT, CV-17-69-BU-BMM-JCL Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND F AMIL Y SERVICES; et a!., RECOMMENDAnONS Defendants. Plaintiff Safron Huot, appearing pro se, commenced this case to appeal a decision of the Montana Supreme Court. The Court dismissed this case for lack of jurisdiction as a federal court does not possess jurisdiction over a litigant's pleading requesting that the court review a state court decision. After dismissal, Huot filed a motion titled "Motion for a Mistrial/Change of Venue/Removal and Replacement of Magistrate Judge" on November 29,2017. (Doc. 12.) Huot requests: (I) a "mistrial" be declared on the grounds of "Obstruction of Justice"; (2) the cases be transferred to the "District of Great Falls"; and (3) United State Magistrate Judge Jeremiah Lynch be removed from Dockets.Justia.com presiding over the cases. Judge Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on January 29, 2018. (Doc. 13.) Neither party filed objections. When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v, Am, 474 U.S. 140,149-52 (1986). This Court will review Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations, however, for clear error. AlcDonneli Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus, Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Judge Lynch determined that a "motion for a mistrial" fails to apply in this situation as an Order of dismissal exists in this case. (Doc. 13 at 2.) Judge Lynch construes Huot's motion as a motion for reliefftomjudgment or order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). ld Judge Lynch further determined that Huot identifies no actionable ground for relief. ld. The Court does not possess the authority to hear the merits ofHuot's claim. IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 13), are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Huot's motion for a mistrial, construed as a Rule 60(b) motion, is DENIED as lacking any basis in fact or law. DATED this 21st day of February, 2018. I / ~r··", f f," '1,.. -~ /'-'? I-/l/' c / '.1 i" ! ! " Brian .\Iorri~ United Slates District Court Judgt' 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
