Roberty v. State of Montana et al, No. 2:2011cv00056 - Document 7 (D. Mont. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 in full. The Petition 1 is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 1/5/2012. Mailed to Roberty. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Roberty v. State of Montana et al Doc. 7 FILED ::: GR , , i:" :- ,- '--' 2012 JRN 5 Arl 11 37 PATRICK E. Cur;;, CLER!( IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT couiltYf DEPUTY CLERK FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION ANTHONY D. ROBERTY, Petitioner, No. CV-11-56-BU-SEH vs. ORDER STATE OF MONTANA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONT ANA, Respondents. United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendations I On December 21, 2011. Petitioner filed Objections 2 on January 4, 2012. The Court reviews de novo tindings and recommendation to which objections are made. 28 USc. § 636(b)(1). I Document No.5. 'Document No.6. Petitioner also attached Citation of Authorities to Objections. -1 Dockets.Justia.com Upon de novo review of the record, and full consideration of the objections, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: I. The Petition3 is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. 2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner. DATEDthis 1"6 S' day of January, 2012. 4 . . . f /rio .MlW\. ~E.HADDON United States District Judge 'Document No.1.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
