DiFrancesco v. Ostby et al, No. 2:2010cv00010 - Document 7 (D. Mont. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 in full. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any appeal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/21/2010. Copy mailed to DiFrancesco. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DiFrancesco v. Ostby et al Doc. 7 .', - , ,', IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT L;; '," C! ,-c;< FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION EVELYN DIFRANCESCO, No, CV-l0-10-GF-SEH Plaintiff, vs_ ORDER CAROLYN S. OSTBY, DISTRICT COURT, JOHNP. DAVIS, LISA LEVERT, SANDY STASH, ARCO, AERL, and TAMKO ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants. United States Magistrate Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendations l on March 30, 2010. Plaintiff filed objections on April 12, I Document No, 5. -1- Dockets.Justia.com 201 0 2• The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendation to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff s Complaint3 is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith as no reasonable person could conclude that an appeal had merit. Fed. R. App. 24(a)(3)(A). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment accordingly. DATED this s+ /lLiraYof April, 2010. United States District Judge 'Document No.6. 'Document No.2. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
