Johnson v. Captain Bodine et al, No. 1:2020cv00102 - Document 6 (D. Mont. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 in full. COA denied. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/28/2020. Mailed to Johnson (TAG)

Download PDF
Johnson v. Captain Bodine et al Doc. 6 Case 1:20-cv-00102-BMM Document 6 Filed 10/28/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION BRANDON DUANE JOHNSON, Petitioner, vs. CV-20-102-BLG-BMM-TJC ORDER CAPTAIN BODINE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents. Petitioner Brandon Duane Johnson (“Johnson”) filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on July 8, 2020. (Doc. 1). United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan issued Findings and Recommendations in this matter on October 5, 2020. (Doc. 5). Judge Cavan recommended that this Court dismiss Johnson’s petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. (Doc. 5 at 3). See Castillo v. McFadden, 399 F.3d 993, 998-99 (9th Cir. 2005) (requiring habeas petitioners to give state courts a “‘fair opportunity’ to apply controlling legal principles to the facts bearing upon [the petitioner’s] constitutional claim”). Judge Johnston also recommended that this Court deny issuance of a certificate of Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00102-BMM Document 6 Filed 10/28/20 Page 2 of 2 appealability under Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings, because Johnson “has not yet made a substantial showing that he was deprived of a constitutional right” under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). (Doc. 5 at 5). No party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed Judge Cavan’s Findings and Recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error in Judge Cavan’s Findings and Recommendations and adopts them in full. ORDER Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Johnson’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as unexhausted. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Dated this 28th day of October, 2020. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.