Tillett v. Bureau of Land Management et al, No. 1:2016cv00148 - Document 24 (D. Mont. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER, On February 16, 2017, the Court entered an order adopting Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 22). The Court's order was premised on an absence of timely objections. (Doc. 22 at 1). It has come to the Court's attention that Plaintiff Jerri Tillett timely filed objections to Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 23). Plaintiff Tillett is entitled to de novo review of those portions of Judge Cavan's Findings and Reco mmendations to which she timely objected. Therefore, the order adopting Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations entered on February 16, 2017, is hereby withdrawn. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 2/21/2017. (EMH) Modified on 2/21/2017 copy Order mailed to pro se party J. Tillet(EMH).

Download PDF
Tillett v. Bureau of Land Management et al Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION FILED F2:8 2 l 2017 Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Billings JERRI JOETTE TILLETT, CV 16-148-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, ORDER vs. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, INTERIOR BOARD OF LANDS APPEALS, and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Defendants. On February 16, 2017, the Court entered an order adopting Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 22). The Court's order was premised on an absence of timely objections. (Doc. 22 at 1). It has come to the Court's attention that Plaintiff Jerri Tillett timely filed objections to Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 23). Plaintiff Tillett is entitled to de novo review of those portions of Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations to which she timely objected. Therefore, the order adopting Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations entered on February 16, 2017, is hereby withdrawn. 1 Dockets.Justia.com .s't- DATED this of/day of February, 2017. ~r7-w~ SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.