Paatalo v. First American Title Company of Montana, Inc. et al, No. 1:2013cv00128 - Document 74 (D. Mont. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. READ ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 5/28/2014. (ACL, ) Modified on 5/28/2014 COPY MAILED TO W. PAATALO (ACL, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Paatalo v. First American Title Company of Montana, Inc. et al Doc. 74 FILED Clellt. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT u.s. District Court Oistrict Of Montana Heiena FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION WILLIAM J. PAATALO, Plaintiff, CV 13-128-BLG-SEH vs. ORDER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF MONTANA. INC., et. al., Defendants. On May 14, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn S. Ostby entered her Findings and Recommendations l on the Motion to Dismiss Defendants MackoffKellogg Law Firm - Charles J. Peterson, and Jason 1. Henderson2 Plaintiff filed objections on May 23, 2014. 3 The Court reviews de novo findings I Doc. 72. 2 Doc. 56. 3 Doc. 73. Dockets.Justia.com and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: 1. Motion to Dismiss Defendants Mackoff Kellogg Law Firm - Charles J. Peterson, and Jason J. Henderson4 is GRANTED as to PlaintiffPaatalo's claims for Breach of Contract (Count I), Breach ofImplied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (Count II), and Violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Count VII) and are DISMISSED with prejudice; and 2. Motion to Dismiss Defendants Mackoff Kellogg Law Firm - Charles J. Peterson, and Jason J. Henderson 5 is DENIED as to PlaintiffPaatalo's claims for .Fraud (Count III); Constructive Fraud (Count IV); and Negligent Misrepresentation (Count V). DATED this ~y of May, 2014. d'~lfotd~ United States District Judge 4 Doc. 56. 5 Doc. 56. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
